Attentional Modulation of the Inner Ear: A Combined Otoacoustic Emission and EEG Study

Attending to a single stimulus in a complex multisensory environment requires the ability to select relevant information while ignoring distracting input. The underlying mechanism and involved neuronal levels of this attentional gain control are still a matter of debate. Here, we investigated the influence of intermodal attention on different levels of auditory processing in humans. It is known that the activity of the cochlear amplifier can be modulated by efferent neurons of the medial olivocochlear complex. We used distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) measurements to monitor cochlear activity during an intermodal cueing paradigm. Simultaneously, central auditory processing was assessed by electroencephalography (EEG) with a steady-state paradigm targeting early cortical responses and analysis of alpha oscillations reflecting higher cognitive control of attentional modulation. We found effects of selective attention at all measured levels of the auditory processing: DPOAE levels differed significantly between periods of visual and auditory attention, showing a reduction during visual attention, but no change during auditory attention. Primary auditory cortex activity, as measured by the auditory steady-state response (ASSR), differed between conditions, with higher ASSRs during auditory than visual attention. Furthermore, the analysis of cortical oscillatory activity revealed increased alpha power over occipitoparietal and frontal regions during auditory compared with visual attention, putatively reflecting suppression of visual processing. In conclusion, this study showed both enhanced processing of attended acoustic stimuli in early sensory cortex and reduced processing of distracting input, both at higher cortical levels and at the most peripheral level of the hearing system, the cochlea.

[1]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The Role of Alpha-Band Brain Oscillations as a Sensory Suppression Mechanism during Selective Attention , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[2]  Josef Parnas,et al.  The amplitude and phase precision of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response depend on the level of arousal , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Almut Engelien,et al.  A combined functional in vivo measure for primary and secondary auditory cortices , 2000, Hearing Research.

[4]  Roshan Cools,et al.  Region-specific modulations in oscillatory alpha activity serve to facilitate processing in the visual and auditory modalities , 2014, NeuroImage.

[5]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Parieto‐occipital ∼1 0Hz activity reflects anticipatory state of visual attention mechanisms , 1998 .

[6]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Involuntary Listening AIDS Hearing , 1997 .

[7]  P. Michie,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions and auditory selective attention , 1996, Hearing Research.

[8]  A. Thornton,et al.  Effect of subject task on contralateral suppression of click evoked otoacoustic emissions , 2007, Hearing Research.

[9]  S. David,et al.  Auditory attention : focusing the searchlight on sound , 2007 .

[10]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  P. Gander,et al.  Evidence for modality-specific but not frequency-specific modulation of human primary auditory cortex by attention , 2010, Hearing Research.

[12]  Cognitive Task Demands Modulate the Sensitivity of the Human Cochlea , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[13]  G. Mangun,et al.  Signal enhancement and suppression during visual–spatial selective attention , 2010, Brain Research.

[14]  L. Collet,et al.  Visual attention and evoked otoacoustic emissions: a slight but real effect. , 1992, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[15]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Attention-dependent suppression of distracter visual input can be cross-modally cued as indexed by anticipatory parieto-occipital alpha-band oscillations. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  Carlos M. Hamamé,et al.  Selective Attention to Visual Stimuli Reduces Cochlear Sensitivity in Chinchillas , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Scherg,et al.  Deconvolution of 40 Hz steady-state fields reveals two overlapping source activities of the human auditory cortex , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Effects of intermodal attention on the auditory steady-state response and the event-related potential. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[19]  I. Russell,et al.  Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms in the Efferent Control of Cochlear Nonlinearities , 2008 .

[20]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  J. Lukas,et al.  Human auditory attention: the olivocochlear bundle may function as a peripheral filter. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[22]  Paolo Toffanin,et al.  by steady-state responses in auditory-visual divided attention , 2009 .

[23]  T. Picton,et al.  The effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response. , 2004, Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN.

[24]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2022 .

[25]  L Collet,et al.  Influence of focused auditory attention on cochlear activity in humans. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[26]  T W Picton,et al.  Human auditory steady-state evoked potentials during selective attention. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  M. Kössl,et al.  Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  J Pernier,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms of auditory selective attention in humans. , 2000, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[29]  Paul Avan,et al.  Analysis of possible interactions of an attentional task with cochlear micromechanics , 1992, Hearing Research.

[30]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Alpha synchronization during auditory spatial short-term memory , 2007, Neuroreport.

[31]  Ole Jensen,et al.  Alpha Oscillations Correlate with the Successful Inhibition of Unattended Stimuli , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  David T. Kemp,et al.  Otoacoustic Emissions: Concepts and Origins , 2008 .

[33]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Human Auditory Attention: A Central or Peripheral Process? , 1971, Science.

[34]  Tianying Ren,et al.  Localization of the Cochlear Amplifier in Living Sensitive Ears , 2011, PloS one.

[35]  L. Robles,et al.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[36]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Intermodal Auditory, Visual, and Tactile Attention Modulates Early Stages of Neural Processing , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  W. Klimesch Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  J. Ashmore Cochlear outer hair cell motility. , 2008, Physiological reviews.

[39]  M. Mørup,et al.  Two discrete components of the 20Hz steady-state response are distinguished through the modulation of activation level , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[40]  D. W. Smith,et al.  Effects of cross-modal selective attention on the sensory periphery: Cochlear sensitivity is altered by selective attention , 2012, Neuroscience.

[41]  Giri P. Krishnan,et al.  The effect of selective attention on the gamma-band auditory steady-state response , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[42]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  α-Band Electroencephalographic Activity over Occipital Cortex Indexes Visuospatial Attention Bias and Predicts Visual Target Detection , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  M. Kössl,et al.  Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state? , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  T. Janssen,et al.  Evidence for a bipolar change in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during contralateral acoustic stimulation in humans. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  T. J. Green,et al.  Capture of attention in selective frequency listening. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  L. Collet,et al.  Attention and otoacoustic emissions: A review , 1994, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[47]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Induced alpha band power changes in the human EEG and attention , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[48]  L. Collet,et al.  Transiently evoked otoacoustic emission amplitudes change with changes of directed attention , 1993, Physiology & Behavior.

[49]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[50]  Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al.  Parieto‐occipital ∼1 0Hz activity reflects anticipatory state of visual attention mechanisms , 1998 .

[51]  J. Connolly,et al.  Human brainstem auditory evoked potentials fail to provide evidence of efferent modulation of auditory input during attentional tasks. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[52]  Jean-Luc Puel,et al.  Selective attention modifies the active micromechanical properties of the cochlea , 1988, Brain Research.

[53]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[54]  Paul Boege,et al.  Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  H. Zenner,et al.  Test–Retest Repeatability of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions , 2008, Ear and hearing.