Number of mammography cases read per year is a strong predictor of sensitivity
暂无分享,去创建一个
Mark F. McEntee | Dianne Georgian-Smith | Michael G. Evanoff | Wasfi I. Suleiman | Sarah J. Lewis | M. McEntee | S. Lewis | D. Georgian-Smith | W. Suleiman | M. Evanoff
[1] L J Yeoman,et al. Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors. , 1996, Radiology.
[2] Warwick B. Lee,et al. Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings. , 2013, Radiology.
[3] Karla Kerlikowske,et al. Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK , 2005, Journal of medical screening.
[4] Karla Kerlikowske,et al. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. , 2003, JAMA.
[5] K. Kerlikowske,et al. Efficacy of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years: comparison of relative and absolute benefit. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[6] Warwick B. Lee,et al. Screening mammography: test set data can reasonably describe actual clinical reporting. , 2013, Radiology.
[7] Craig A. Beam,et al. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.
[8] L. Tabár,et al. The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up. , 2000, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[9] Helen C. Cowley,et al. Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[10] Richard J. K. Taylor,et al. Mammography Screening and Breast Cancer Mortality in New South Wales, Australia , 2004, Cancer Causes & Control.
[11] Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al. Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms using fractal analysis and angular spread of power , 2010, Medical Imaging.
[12] Patrick C. Brennan,et al. Breast Screen New South Wales Generally Demonstrates Good Radiologic Viewing Conditions , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.
[13] S. Lange,et al. Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how? , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[14] M. Salmeri,et al. Bilateral asymmetry identification for the early detection of breast cancer , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications.
[15] M F McEntee,et al. On the choice of acceptance radius in free-response observer performance studies. , 2013, The British journal of radiology.
[16] Warwick B. Lee,et al. Malignancy detection in digital mammograms: important reader characteristics and required case numbers. , 2010, Academic radiology.
[17] J. Elmore,et al. Does diagnostic accuracy in mammography depend on radiologists' experience? , 1998, Journal of women's health.
[18] H. Lynch,et al. Psychologic Aspects of Cancer Genetic Testing: A Research Update for Clinicians , 1997 .
[19] E A Sickles,et al. Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program. , 2000, Radiology.
[20] J. J. Gisvold,et al. Likelihood of malignant disease for various categories of mammographically detected, nonpalpable breast lesions. , 1993, Mayo Clinic proceedings.
[21] B. Monsees,et al. The Mammography Quality Standards Act. An overview of the regulations and guidance. , 2000, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[22] L. Tabár,et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties , 2002, Cancer.
[23] Ingvar Andersson,et al. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials , 2002, The Lancet.