Can Atmospheric Reanalysis Data Sets Be Used to Reproduce Flooding Over Large Scales?

Floods are costly to global economies and can be exceptionally lethal. The ability to produce consistent flood hazard maps over large areas could provide a significant contribution to reducing such losses, as the lack of knowledge concerning flood risk is a major factor in the transformation of river floods into flood disasters. In order to accurately reproduce flooding in river channels and floodplains, high spatial resolution hydrodynamic models are needed. Despite being computationally expensive, recent advances have made their continental to global implementation feasible, although inputs for long‐term simulations may require the use of reanalysis meteorological products especially in data‐poor regions. We employ a coupled hydrologic/hydrodynamic model cascade forced by the 20CRv2 reanalysis data set and evaluate its ability to reproduce flood inundation area and volume for Australia during the 1973–2012 period. Ensemble simulations using the reanalysis data were performed to account for uncertainty in the meteorology and compared with a validated benchmark simulation. Results show that the reanalysis ensemble capture the inundated areas and volumes relatively well, with correlations for the ensemble mean of 0.82 and 0.85 for area and volume, respectively, although the meteorological ensemble spread propagates in large uncertainty of the simulated flood characteristics.

[1]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Dynamics of the perfect storms: La Niña and Australia’s extreme rainfall and floods of 1974 and 2011 , 2017, Climate Dynamics.

[2]  F. Pappenberger,et al.  Complex picture for likelihood of ENSO-driven flood hazard , 2017, Nature Communications.

[3]  Albert J. Kettner,et al.  Design with nature: Causation and avoidance of catastrophic flooding, Myanmar , 2017 .

[4]  F. Pappenberger,et al.  Building a multimodel flood prediction system with the TIGGE archive , 2016 .

[5]  Yukiko Hirabayashi,et al.  Global-scale river flood vulnerability in the last 50 years , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[6]  C. Sampson,et al.  Rethinking flood hazard at the global scale , 2016 .

[7]  Dai Yamazaki,et al.  The credibility challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis , 2016, Environmental Research Letters.

[8]  François Brissette,et al.  Can Precipitation and Temperature from Meteorological Reanalyses Be Used for Hydrological Modeling , 2016 .

[9]  Xiquan Dong,et al.  Evaluation and intercomparison of clouds, precipitation, and radiation budgets in recent reanalyses using satellite-surface observations , 2016, Climate Dynamics.

[10]  L. Lymburner,et al.  Water observations from space: Mapping surface water from 25 years of Landsat imagery across Australia , 2016 .

[11]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  A high‐resolution global flood hazard model† , 2015, Water resources research.

[12]  P. Bates,et al.  Usefulness and limitations of global flood risk models , 2015 .

[13]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  The impact of uncertain precipitation data on insurance loss estimates using a flood catastrophe model , 2014 .

[14]  Brenden Jongman,et al.  Assessing flood risk at the global scale: model setup, results, and sensitivity , 2013 .

[15]  P. Bates,et al.  A first large‐scale flood inundation forecasting model , 2013 .

[16]  Guy Schumann,et al.  A simple global river bankfull width and depth database , 2013 .

[17]  R. Nicholls,et al.  Future flood losses in major coastal cities , 2013 .

[18]  Luis Samaniego,et al.  Toward computationally efficient large‐scale hydrologic predictions with a multiscale regionalization scheme , 2013 .

[19]  S. Doocy,et al.  The Human Impact of Tsunamis: a Historical Review of Events 1900-2009 and Systematic Literature Review , 2013, PLoS currents.

[20]  S. Doocy,et al.  The Human Impact of Floods: a Historical Review of Events 1980-2009 and Systematic Literature Review , 2013, PLoS currents.

[21]  R. Paiva,et al.  Validation of a full hydrodynamic model for large‐scale hydrologic modelling in the Amazon , 2013 .

[22]  F. Pappenberger,et al.  Deriving global flood hazard maps of fluvial floods through a physical model cascade , 2012 .

[23]  P. Bates,et al.  A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas , 2012 .

[24]  Q. G. Bingham,et al.  Application of high‐resolution, remotely sensed data for transient storage modeling parameter estimation , 2012 .

[25]  Y. Hong,et al.  Evaluation of Global Flood Detection Using Satellite-Based Rainfall and a Hydrologic Model , 2012 .

[26]  H. Winsemius,et al.  A framework for global river flood risk assessments , 2012 .

[27]  S. Schubert,et al.  MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications , 2011 .

[28]  Adriana Bruggeman,et al.  Impact of climate change on the water resources of the eastern Mediterranean and Middle East region: Modeled 21st century changes and implications , 2011 .

[29]  S. Kanae,et al.  A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model , 2011 .

[30]  Xixi Lu,et al.  Let us create flood hazard maps for developing countries , 2011 .

[31]  M. Dettinger,et al.  The utility of daily large-scale climate data in the assessment of climate change impacts on daily streamflow in California , 2010 .

[32]  P. Bates,et al.  A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. , 2010 .

[33]  Damien Sulla-Menashe,et al.  MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets , 2010 .

[34]  D. Jones,et al.  High-quality spatial climate data-sets for Australia , 2009 .

[35]  Arthur A. Mirin,et al.  Detection and Attribution of Streamflow Timing Changes to Climate Change in the Western United States , 2009 .

[36]  P. Jones,et al.  The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project , 2009 .

[37]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  An efficient calibration method for continental‐scale land surface modeling , 2008 .

[38]  Robert E. Criss,et al.  Do Nash values have value? Discussion and alternate proposals , 2008 .

[39]  E. Maurer,et al.  Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods , 2007 .

[40]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Do Nash values have value? , 2007 .

[41]  Y. Hong,et al.  The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-Global, Multiyear, Combined-Sensor Precipitation Estimates at Fine Scales , 2007 .

[42]  E. Wood,et al.  Development of a 50-Year High-Resolution Global Dataset of Meteorological Forcings for Land Surface Modeling , 2006 .

[43]  P. Döll,et al.  Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands , 2004 .

[44]  Chris Moran,et al.  ASRIS: the database , 2003 .

[45]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Predicting the Discharge of Global Rivers , 2001, Journal of Climate.

[46]  Bart Nijssen,et al.  Eegional scale hydrology: I. Formulation of the VIC-2L model coupled to a routing model , 1998 .

[47]  Jonathan A. Tawn,et al.  A semi-parametric model for multivariate extreme values , 1995 .

[48]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[49]  P. Rousseeuw.  Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[50]  C. Kobayashi,et al.  The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Specifications and Basic Characteristics , 2015 .

[51]  K. Strzepek,et al.  Assessing flood risk at the global scale: model setup, results, and sensitivity , 2013 .

[52]  Nick Marsh,et al.  Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management , 2010 .

[53]  M. Dettinger,et al.  Downscaling With Constructed Analogues: Daily Precipitation and Temperature Fields Over The United States , 2008 .