Digital indirect-detection x-ray imagers with microlens focusing: effects of Fresnel reflections from the microlens layer
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al. Analysis of signal propagation in optically coupled detectors for digital mammography: II. Lens and fibre optics. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.
[2] Larry E. Antonuk,et al. Large-area 97-μm pitch indirect-detection active-matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) , 1998, Medical Imaging.
[3] Michael Bass. Devices, measurements, and properties , 1995 .
[4] M. Yaffe,et al. Analysis of signal propagation in optically coupled detectors for digital mammography: I. Phosphor screens. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.
[5] Berkman Sahiner,et al. Technique to improve the effective fill factor of digital mammographic imagers , 1998, Medical Imaging.
[6] Berkman Sahiner,et al. Digital mammographic imaging using microlens focusing: estimation of light collection and x-ray utilization , 1999, Medical Imaging.
[7] Larry E. Antonuk,et al. Development of a high-resolution active-matrix flat-panel imager with enhanced fill factor , 1997, Medical Imaging.
[8] S Suryanarayanan,et al. Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. , 2000, Medical physics.
[9] Robert A. Street,et al. Charge collection and capacitance in continuous-film flat-panel detectors , 2000, Medical Imaging.
[10] Larry E. Antonuk,et al. Evaluation of direct detection and indirect detection active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for digital mammography , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.