Digital indirect-detection x-ray imagers with microlens focusing: effects of Fresnel reflections from the microlens layer

We have been investigating whether a microlens layer placed between the phosphor and the photodetector can improve indirect detection x-ray imagers. Using a simulation study, we analyzed the light collection properties of the proposed imager taking into account Fresnel reflection and transmission properties of the lenses and the screen. A digital x-ray imager combining an 82-μm-thick Gd2O2S:Tb phosphor screen, a fused silica microlens layer, and a 127-μm pixel pitch photodetector (optical fill factor of 57%) were modeled. The light collection for the prototypes varied from 53% to 69% for lens thicknesses ranging from 10 to 50 μm. The full-width half-maximum (FWHM) of the light spread function ranged from 177-192 μm. 4-8% of the light was reflected back into the phosphor screen when correctly taking into account Fresnel reflections for these prototype imagers. In comparison, 56% of the light was collected and the FWHM of the light spread function was 174 μm for a conventional imager with the screen in direct contact with the photodetector. We observed that the light collection was overestimated by 6-9% but the spread functions were basically unaffected when the Fresnel assumption was not utilized in the simulations. This study shows that a properly designed microlens layer can more than offset Fresnel losses, thereby producing an improved digital x-ray imager.

[1]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Analysis of signal propagation in optically coupled detectors for digital mammography: II. Lens and fibre optics. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Large-area 97-μm pitch indirect-detection active-matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[3]  Michael Bass Devices, measurements, and properties , 1995 .

[4]  M. Yaffe,et al.  Analysis of signal propagation in optically coupled detectors for digital mammography: I. Phosphor screens. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Technique to improve the effective fill factor of digital mammographic imagers , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Digital mammographic imaging using microlens focusing: estimation of light collection and x-ray utilization , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[7]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Development of a high-resolution active-matrix flat-panel imager with enhanced fill factor , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[8]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. , 2000, Medical physics.

[9]  Robert A. Street,et al.  Charge collection and capacitance in continuous-film flat-panel detectors , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Evaluation of direct detection and indirect detection active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for digital mammography , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.