Reappraisal of outbound open innovation under the policy of China’s ‘Market for Technology’

ABSTRACT China’s ‘Market for Technology’ policy has attracted much interest over the past decade. In light of a relative emphasis on the spillover effects of joint ventures, this study examines the transferring effects of Multinationals’ (MNCs) outbound open innovation in such a context. A survey of 2071 research and development (R&D) contract transactions between Chinese entities and MNCs indicates both internal factors (e.g. organisational capabilities) and external factors (e.g. the role of Intellectual Property protection) affect the transferring effects, which reformulate the focus of the Policy from the relational dimension of ‘Government vs. MNCs’ to the transactional dimension of ‘Domestic entities vs. MNCs’. We thus conclude that MNCs’ active initiative in the involvement of technology transfer and the success of domestic transaction partners combine to contribute to the technology progress within China’s ‘Market for Technology’ policy.

[1]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape , 2006 .

[2]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[3]  Kuo-Nan Hsieh,et al.  Open versus closed new service development: the influences of project novelty , 2012 .

[4]  O. Williamson.  Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[5]  Chung-Jen Chen,et al.  How Do Internal Openness and External Openness Affect Innovation Capabilities and Firm Performance? , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[6]  Len Jessup,et al.  How Open Innovation Affects the Drivers of Competitive Advantage , 2012 .

[7]  David Kline,et al.  Sharing the Corporate Crown Jewels , 2003 .

[8]  Colin C.J. Cheng,et al.  When is open innovation beneficial? The role of strategic orientation , 2014 .

[9]  Ellen Enkel,et al.  Attributes required for profiting from open innovation in networks , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[10]  Eric Shiu,et al.  The inconvenient truth of the relationship between open innovation activities and innovation performance , 2015 .

[11]  Bernard Croisier.  The governance of external research: empirical test of some transaction‐cost related factors , 1998 .

[12]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[13]  Oliver E. Williamson,et al.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting . By Oliver E. Williamson. (New York: Free Press, 1985. Pp. 450. $27.95.) , 1986 .

[14]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities , 2005 .

[15]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  A Note on Outbound Open Innovation and Firm Performance , 2015 .

[16]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[17]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Hierarchical Segmentation of R&D Process and Intellectual Property Protection: Evidence From Multinational R&D Laboratories in China , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[18]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Toward an Assessment of Software Development Risk , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[20]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Technology Alliance Portfolios and Financial Performance: Value-Enhancing and Cost-Increasing Effects of Open Innovation* , 2010 .

[21]  D. Faems,et al.  Book review: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm / by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West. - Oxford University Press. - ISBN 978-0-19929072-7 , 2008 .

[22]  Michael A. Stanko,et al.  Controversy in Innovation Outsourcing Research: Review, Synthesis and Future Directions , 2010 .

[23]  Sungjoon Lee,et al.  Antecedents of Open Innovation at the Project Level: Empirical Analysis of Korean Firms , 2015 .

[24]  G. Pisano.  The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[25]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Outbound Open Innovation and its Effect on Firm Performance: Examining Environmental Influences , 2009 .

[26]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  On The Performance Of Technology-Sourcing Partnerships: The Interaction Between Partner Interdependence And Technology Attributes , 2000 .

[27]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[28]  Martin Fransman,et al.  Japan's Computer and Communications Industry: The Evolution of Industrial Giants and Global Competitiveness , 1995 .

[29]  A. Salter,et al.  The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration , 2014 .

[30]  O. Williamson,et al.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[31]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  Contracts in Offshore Software Development: An Empirical Analysis , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[32]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .

[33]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[34]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .