UNIVERSITY STUDENT READING PREFERENCES IN RELATION TO THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS

In this study 251 Australian university students, with a mean age of 26.46, indicated their preference for different types of reading material. A subset of 136 participants additionally reported how many hours per week they typically engage in recreational reading and non-recreational reading, indicated their motivation for recreational reading, completed a Big Five personality inventory, and kept a week-long reading log in which they recorded daily their recreational reading of different types of materials. A principal components analysis showed that reading preferences grouped into eight content areas. A set correlation analysis showed that overall the Big Five personality dimensions predicted reading preferences. Openness and conscientiousness in particular were good predictors of four specific types of content preferences. Preference for a certain type of material tended to predict time spent reading that material as reported in the week-long reading log. Further, the Big Five personality dimensions together predicted total amount of recreational reading, amount of reading of favorite material, and amount of non-recreational reading.

[1]  Seth Finn,et al.  Origins of Media Exposure , 1997 .

[2]  O. John.  The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. , 1990 .

[3]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the five-factor model. , 1996 .

[4]  M. Cecil Smith,et al.  Literacy for the Twenty-First Century: Research, Policy, Practices, and the National Adult Literacy Survey , 1998 .

[5]  P. Costa,et al.  Personality trait structure as a human universal. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[6]  Freda Kemp.  Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 2003 .

[7]  Jon Shapiro,et al.  FACTORS INVOLVED IN THE LEISURE READING OF UPPER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS , 1997 .

[8]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[9]  K. Stanovich.  Progress in Understanding Reading: Scientific Foundations and New Frontiers , 2000 .

[10]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[11]  T. E. Smith.  Time and academic achievement , 1990, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[12]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Motivational and Cognitive Predictors of Text Comprehension and Reading Amount , 1999 .

[13]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Reading in the Real World and Its Correlates. , 1993 .

[14]  Alice M. Scales, Ock Rhee.  ADULT READING HABITS AND PATTERNS , 2001 .

[15]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. , 2000 .

[16]  Jeff McQuillan, Julie Au.  THE EFFECT OF PRINT ACCESS ON READING FREQUENCY , 2001 .

[17]  W. R. Kitz.  Adult Literacy , 1988 .

[18]  C. M. Koolstra,et al.  Longitudinal Effects of Television on Children''s Leisure-time Reading , 1996 .

[19]  Gerbert Kraaykamp,et al.  Trends in leisure reading: Forty years of research on reading in the Netherlands , 1998 .

[20]  WHAT DO ADULTS READ , 1972 .

[21]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[22]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Classroom Conditions for Motivation and Engagement in Reading , 2001 .

[23]  Reading Achievement and Attitude Productivity among 17-Year Olds , 1983 .

[24]  R. McCrae,et al.  Heritability of facet-level traits in a cross-cultural twin sample: support for a hierarchical model of personality. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.