Comparison of spatial scan statistic and spatial filtering in estimating low birth weight clusters

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to examine the spatial and population (e.g., socio-economic) characteristics of low birthweight using two different cluster estimation techniques. We compared the results of Kulldorff's Spatial Scan Statistic with the results of Rushton's Spatial filtering technique across increasing sizes of spatial filters (circle). We were able to demonstrate that varying approaches exist to explore spatial variation in patterns of low birth weight.ResultsSpatial filtering results did not show any particular area that was not statistically significant based on SaTScan. The high rates, which remain as the filter size increases to 0.4, 0.5 to 0.6 miles, respectively, indicate that these differences are less likely due to chance. The maternal characteristics of births within clusters differed considerably between the two methods. Progressively larger Spatial filters removed local spatial variability, which eventually produced an approximate uniform pattern of low birth weight.ConclusionSaTScan and Spatial filtering cluster estimation methods produced noticeably different results from the same individual level birth data. SaTScan clusters are likely to differ from Spatial filtering clusters in terms of population characteristics and geographic area within clusters. Using the two methods in conjunction could provide more detail about the population and spatial features contained with each type of cluster.

[1]  C. M. Croner,et al.  Public Health GIS and the Internet , 2003, Annual review of public health.

[2]  B. Turnbull,et al.  Monitoring for clusters of disease: application to leukemia incidence in upstate New York. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  K. Kafadar,et al.  Smoothing geographical data, particularly rates of disease. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Ellen K Cromley,et al.  GIS and disease. , 2003, Annual review of public health.

[5]  R. Bhopal,et al.  Users' perspectives on epidemiological, GIS and point pattern approaches to analysing environment and health data. , 2004, Health & place.

[6]  M R Greenberg,et al.  Cancer clusters: the importance of monitoring multiple geographic scales. , 1993, Social science & medicine.

[7]  M. Kulldor,et al.  Prospective time-periodic geographical disease surveillance using a scan statistic , 2001 .

[8]  S. Melly,et al.  Using GIS and historical records to reconstruct residential exposure to large-scale pesticide application , 2002, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[9]  Jarvis T. Chen,et al.  Choosing area based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in low birth weight and childhood lead poisoning: The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US) , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[10]  Holly Samociuk,et al.  Breast cancer surveillance using gridded population units, Connecticut, 1992 to 1995. , 2003, Annals of epidemiology.

[11]  J. Maantay,et al.  Mapping environmental injustices: pitfalls and potential of geographic information systems in assessing environmental health and equity. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[12]  Thomas Kistemann,et al.  Spatial patterns of diarrhoeal illnesses with regard to water supply structures--a GIS analysis. , 2002, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[13]  T. Richards,et al.  Geographic information systems and public health: mapping the future. , 1999, Public health reports.

[14]  Jing Nie,et al.  Positional Accuracy of Geocoded Addresses in Epidemiologic Research , 2003, Epidemiology.

[15]  Michael Emch,et al.  Identifying environmental risk factors for endemic cholera: a raster GIS approach. , 2002, Health & place.

[16]  S. McLafferty,et al.  GIS and Public Health , 2002 .

[17]  J. Diem,et al.  A critical examination of ozone mapping from a spatial-scale perspective. , 2003, Environmental pollution.

[18]  Kai Elgethun,et al.  Time-location analysis for exposure assessment studies of children using a novel global positioning system instrument. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[19]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Geographical and environmental epidemiology : methods for small-area studies , 1997 .

[20]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Methods for the assessment of disease clusters , 1996 .

[21]  M Kulldorff,et al.  Evaluation of spatial filters to create smoothed maps of health data. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  G. Rushton,et al.  Exploratory spatial analysis of birth defect rates in an urban population. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[23]  Paul B English,et al.  Changes in the spatial pattern of low birth weight in a southern California county: the role of individual and neighborhood level factors. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[24]  Gerard Rushton,et al.  Public health, GIS, and spatial analytic tools. , 2003, Annual review of public health.

[25]  George Christakos,et al.  Efficient mapping of California mortality fields at different spatial scales , 2003, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[26]  S V Subramanian,et al.  Race/ethnicity, gender, and monitoring socioeconomic gradients in health: a comparison of area-based socioeconomic measures--the public health disparities geocoding project. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[27]  H. Burkom.  Biosurveillance applying scan statistics with multiple, disparate data sources , 2003, Journal of Urban Health.

[28]  L. Stallones,et al.  Surveillance around hazardous waste sites: geographic information systems and reproductive outcomes. , 1992, Environmental research.

[29]  Amy Trentham-Dietz,et al.  Geocoding Addresses from a Large Population-based Study: Lessons Learned , 2003, Epidemiology.