VIRT2UE: A European train-the-trainer programme for teaching research integrity

Universities and other research institutions are increasingly providing additional training in research integrity to improve the quality and reliability of research. Various training courses have been developed, with diverse learning goals and content. Despite the importance of training that focuses on moral character and professional virtues, there remains a lack of training that adopts a virtue ethics approach. To address this, we, a European Commission-funded consortium, have designed a train-the-trainer programme for research integrity. The programme is based on (1) virtue ethics, (2) the ethos of science, (3) learning by doing and (4) learner-centred teaching. The blended learning programme combines e-learning modules with participatory group sessions. Trainers are taught how to guide researchers through a series of structured exercises for fostering reflection on scientific virtues, and how to promote understanding and application of the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Trainers are provided with adaptable tools and resources that can be used and combined in different ways. The programme implementation began in Spring 2020 and 470 trainers have participated to date. When trainers were asked to grade – between 0 (very bad) and 10 (excellent) – the e-learning modules and the participatory exercises, 60% scored a grade 8 or higher (median = 8, IQR = 2) for the e-learning modules, whereas 80% scored a grade 8 or higher (median = 9, IQR = 1) for the participatory exercises. A majority felt that the training helped them as a trainer to learn about ways to organise and teach a research integrity course (82%) and would recommend the interactive exercises to others (92%). Trainers have educated over 3300 researchers in Europe using our virtue-based approach. The VIRT2UE train-the-trainer programme fosters research integrity by providing trainers with exercises and tools which enable them to stimulate the development of good researchers across Europe.

[1]  A. Marušić,et al.  Development of consensus on essential virtues for ethics and research integrity training using a modified Delphi approach , 2022, Accountability in research.

[2]  R. Andorno,et al.  Effective Strategies for Research Integrity Training—a Meta-analysis , 2021, Educational Psychology Review.

[3]  K. Dierickx,et al.  Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study , 2021, BMC medical ethics.

[4]  Miri Barak,et al.  Applying a Social Constructivist Approach to an Online Course on Ethics of Research , 2021, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[5]  Kris Dierickx,et al.  Educating PhD Students in Research Integrity in Europe , 2021, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[6]  G. Veltri,et al.  Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk , 2020, Nature.

[7]  Kris Dierickx,et al.  Collecting and characterizing existing and freely accessible research integrity educational resources , 2020, Accountability in research.

[8]  Katharina Fuerholzer,et al.  Good Scientific Practice: Developing a Curriculum for Medical Students in Germany , 2020, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[9]  Chet McLeskey,et al.  A New Method for a Virtue-Based Responsible Conduct of Research Curriculum: Pilot Test Results , 2019, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[10]  G. Widdershoven,et al.  A pragmatist approach to clinical ethics support: overcoming the perils of ethical pluralism , 2019, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.

[11]  A. Marušić,et al.  Perspectives of key stakeholders on essential virtues for good scientific practice in research areas. , 2018, Accountability in research.

[12]  Karina D. Torralba,et al.  Scientific productivity: An exploratory study of metrics and incentives , 2018, PloS one.

[13]  Logan L. Watts,et al.  Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education , 2017, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[14]  E. Michelle Todd,et al.  A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach , 2017, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[15]  M. Stolper,et al.  Bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation , 2016, BMC medical ethics.

[16]  Jiin-Yu Chen.  Research as Profession and Practice: Frameworks for Guiding the Responsible Conduct of Research , 2016, Accountability in research.

[17]  Robert T. Pennock,et al.  Developing a Scientific Virtue-Based Approach to Science Ethics Training , 2016, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[18]  Hyemin Han,et al.  Virtue Ethics, Positive Psychology, and a New Model of Science and Engineering Ethics Education , 2015, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[19]  M. Stolper,et al.  Learning by Doing. Training Health Care Professionals to Become Facilitator of Moral Case Deliberation , 2015, HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues.

[20]  L. Bouter.  Commentary: Perverse Incentives or Rotten Apples? , 2015, Accountability in research.

[21]  J. Solbakk.  What is it to do good medical ethics? On the concepts of ‘good’ and ‘goodness’ in medical ethics , 2014, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[22]  J. Baehr.  Educating for Intellectual Virtues: From Theory to Practice , 2013 .

[23]  D. Resnik.  Ethical Virtues in Scientific Research , 2012, Accountability in research.

[24]  G. Widdershoven,et al.  The Role of Emotions in Moral Case Deliberation: Theory, Practice, and Methodology , 2011, Bioethics.

[25]  Geoff Moore,et al.  In Search of Organizational Virtue in Business: Agents, Goods, Practices, Institutions and Environments , 2006 .

[26]  M. Wittrock.  Generative Learning Processes of the Brain , 1992 .

[27]  L. Bouter,et al.  Virtue-based ethics and integrity of research: train-the-trainer programme for upholding the principles and practices of the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (VIRT2UE) , 2021, Research Ideas and Outcomes.