Clinical role of early dynamic FDG-PET/CT for the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma

ObjectivesWe studied the usefulness of early dynamic (ED) and whole-body (WB) FDG-PET/CT for the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).MethodsOne hundred patients with 107 tumours underwent kidney ED and WB FDG-PET/CT. We visually and semiquantitatively evaluated the FDG accumulation in RCCs in the ED and WB phases, and compared the accumulation values with regard to histological type (clear cell carcinoma [CCC] vs. non-clear cell carcinoma [N-CCC]), the TNM stage (high stage [3–4] vs. low stage [1–2]), the Fuhrman grade (high grade [3–4] vs. low grade [1–2]) and presence versus absence of venous (V) and lymphatic (Ly) invasion.ResultsIn the ED phase, visual evaluation revealed no significant differences in FDG accumulation in terms of each item. However, the maximum standardized uptake value and tumour-to-normal tissue ratios were significantly higher in the CCCs compared to the N-CCCs (p < 0.001). In the WB phase, in contrast, significantly higher FDG accumulation (p < 0.001) was found in RCCs with a higher TNM stage, higher Furman grade, and the presence of V and Ly invasion in both the visual and the semiquantitative evaluations.ConclusionsED and WB FDG-PET/CT is a useful tool for the evaluation of RCCs.Key Points• ED and WB FDG-PET/ CT helps to assess patients with RCC• ED FDG-PET/CT enabled differentiation between CCC and N-CCC• FDG accumulation in the WB phase reflects tumour aggressiveness• Management of RCC is improved by ED and WB FDG-PET/CT

[1]  R. Figlin,et al.  Improved prognostication of renal cell carcinoma using an integrated staging system. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Sam Belakhlef,et al.  Early Dynamic PET/CT and 18F-FDG Blood Flow Imaging in Bladder Cancer Detection: A Novel Approach , 2011, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[3]  I. Ak,et al.  F-18 FDG pet in detecting renal cell carcinoma , 2005, Acta radiologica.

[4]  R. Tardanico,et al.  Role of F18-FDG-PET/CT in restaging patients affected by renal carcinoma. , 2013, Nuclear medicine review. Central & Eastern Europe.

[5]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2013 , 2013, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  L. Strauss,et al.  Tumor Aggressiveness and Patient Outcome in Cancer of the Pancreas Assessed by Dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  M. Srougi,et al.  Microvascular tumour invasion in renal cell carcinoma: the most important prognostic factor , 2007, BJU international.

[8]  H. Bensadoun,et al.  Efficiency of [18F]FDG PET in characterising renal cancer and detecting distant metastases: a comparison with CT , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  C. Peota Novel approach. , 2011, Minnesota medicine.

[10]  J. Sosna,et al.  FDG PET/CT early dynamic blood flow and late standardized uptake value determination in hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2011, Radiology.

[11]  Andreas Stallmach,et al.  Early Dynamic 18F-FDG PET to Detect Hyperperfusion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Liver Lesions , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  S. Yasuda,et al.  Significance of 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET) for detection of renal cell carcinoma and immunohistochemical glucose transporter 1 (GLUT‐1) expression in the cancer , 2002, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[13]  J. Cheville,et al.  Differences in organ system of distant metastasis by renal cell carcinoma subtype. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[14]  J. Bourland American Association of Physicists in Medicine , 2001 .

[15]  Daniel Margolis,et al.  Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: discrimination from other renal cell carcinoma subtypes and oncocytoma at multiphasic multidetector CT. , 2013, Radiology.

[16]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[17]  A. Otunctemur,et al.  Standardized uptake values highly correlate with tumor size and Fuhrman grade in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. , 2014, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[18]  M. Kanematsu,et al.  18-F fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography as a pathological grade predictor for renal clear cell carcinomas , 2015, European Radiology.

[19]  H. Shiina,et al.  Comparison of utility of tumor size and apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation of low- and high-grade clear-cell renal cell carcinoma , 2015, Acta radiologica.

[20]  S. Berlangieri,et al.  Clinical role of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for detection and management of renal cell carcinoma. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[21]  E. Ozbek,et al.  A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of indeterminate renal masses , 2011, Nuclear medicine communications.

[22]  A. Ravaud,et al.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the differentiation of low and high grade clear cell renal carcinoma , 2014, European Radiology.

[23]  S. Fuhrman,et al.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma , 1982, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[24]  M. Jinzaki,et al.  Double-Phase Helical CT of Small Renal Parenchymal Neoplasms: Correlation with Pathologic Findings and Tumor Angiogenesis , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[25]  J. Cheville,et al.  Comparisons of Outcome and Prognostic Features Among Histologic Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.