Analysis of defects on the compressive behaviors of open-cell metal foams through models using the FEM

Abstract Effects of three different types of morphological defects – missing cell struts, filled cell faces and curved cell struts – on the compressive behaviors of open-cell metal foams are investigated using finite element method (FEM) in this study. The imperfect model is individually constructed by introducing the corresponding type of defect at the random locations of three-dimensional intact Kelvin structures. Emphasis is placed on the quantitative analysis of effects of defects on the effective Young's modulus, yield strength and performance of densification of open-cell metal foams. Furthermore, the influences of model domain size and average analysis on the numerical results are investigated for each type of imperfect model, respectively. Comparing the weakening effects caused by different types of defects, it shows that the missing cell struts lead to the maximum decrement for the mechanical properties of open-cell metal foams in all. However, the filled cell faces has a more significant effect on the onset of densification of open-cell metal foams, and produces more weakening on the yield strength than that of the effective Young's modulus different from other types of defects.

[1]  Jeffrey Wadsworth,et al.  Effect of cell morphology on the compressive properties of open-cell aluminum foams , 2000 .

[2]  Xin-Lin Gao,et al.  Effects of Cell Shape and Strut Cross-Sectional Area Variations on the Elastic Properties of Three-Dimensional Open-cell Foams , 2004 .

[3]  K. Thoma,et al.  Numerical investigations of the elastic and plastic behaviour of an open-cell aluminium foam , 2005 .

[4]  N. Ohno,et al.  Yield and buckling behavior of Kelvin open-cell foams subjected to uniaxial compression , 2010 .

[5]  Ya-Peng Shen,et al.  Three-dimensional modeling of the mechanical property of linearly elastic open cell foams , 2005 .

[6]  D. Reinelt,et al.  Structure of random monodisperse foam. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Stelios Kyriakides,et al.  Compressive response of open-cell foams. Part I: Morphology and elastic properties , 2005 .

[8]  Shu Zhen,et al.  Metallic foams: their production, properties and applications , 1983 .

[9]  M. H. Luxner,et al.  Numerical simulations of 3D open cell structures - influence of structural irregularities on elasto-plasticity and deformation localization , 2007 .

[10]  S. Kyriakides,et al.  On the compressive strength of open-cell metal foams with Kelvin and random cell structures , 2010 .

[11]  J. Banhart.  Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams , 2001 .

[12]  Stelios Kyriakides,et al.  On the microstructure of open-cell foams and its effect on elastic properties , 2008 .

[13]  Kazuto Tanaka,et al.  Influence of cell shape variations on elastic stiffness of closed cell cellular solids , 1998 .

[14]  W. Soboyejo,et al.  An investigation of the microstructure and strength of open-cell 6101 aluminum foams , 2002 .

[15]  Norman A. Fleck,et al.  Effect of imperfections on the yielding of two-dimensional foams , 1999 .

[16]  N. J. Mills,et al.  Analysis of the elastic properties of open-cell foams with tetrakaidecahedral cells , 1997 .

[17]  Edward J. Garboczi,et al.  Elastic properties of model random three-dimensional open-cell solids , 2002 .

[18]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Defect sensitivity of a 3D truss material , 2001 .

[19]  S. Kyriakides,et al.  On the crushing of aluminum open-cell foams: Part I. Experiments , 2009 .

[20]  Joachim L. Grenestedt,et al.  Influence of wavy imperfections in cell walls on elastic stiffness of cellular solids , 1998 .

[21]  Xin-Lin Gao,et al.  Effects of cell shape and cell wall thickness variations on the elastic properties of two-dimensional cellular solids , 2005 .

[22]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Effects of solid distribution on the stiffness and strength of metallic foams , 1998 .

[23]  Hilary Bart-Smith,et al.  On the mechanical performance of closed cell Al alloy foams , 1997 .

[24]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Multifunctionality of cellular metal systems , 1998 .

[25]  Anthony Roberts,et al.  Elastic moduli of model random three-dimensional closed-cell cellular solids , 2000 .

[26]  Stelios Kyriakides,et al.  Compressive response of open cell foams part II: Initiation and evolution of crushing , 2005 .

[27]  Jong-Shin Huang,et al.  Effects of curved cell edges on the stiffness and strength of two-dimensional cellular solids , 2005 .

[28]  L. Gibson,et al.  The effects of cell face curvature and corrugations on the stiffness and strength of metallic foams , 1998 .

[29]  H. Nayeb-Hashemi,et al.  Mechanical properties of functionally graded 2-D cellular structures: A finite element simulation , 2009 .

[30]  D. L. Thomas,et al.  Timoshenko beam finite elements , 1973 .

[31]  Hilary Bart-Smith,et al.  Compressive deformation and yielding mechanisms in cellular Al alloys determined using X-ray tomography and surface strain mapping , 1998 .

[32]  W. E. Warren,et al.  Linear Elastic Behavior of a Low-Density Kelvin Foam With Open Cells , 1997 .

[33]  S. Kyriakides,et al.  On the crushing of aluminum open-cell foams: Part II analysis , 2009 .

[34]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  A numerical model for reinforced concrete structures , 2005 .

[35]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Aluminum foams produced by liquid-state processes , 1998 .

[36]  Ajit K. Roy,et al.  Micromechanics model for three-dimensional open-cell foams using a tetrakaidecahedral unit cell and Castigliano's second theorem , 2003 .

[37]  H. Nayeb-Hashemi,et al.  Effect of defects on elastic–plastic behavior of cellular materials , 2008 .