EFFECT OF COMPETITION ON THE INTERACTION BETWEEN MAIZE AND WEED EXPOSED TO WATER DEFICIENCY

ABSTRACT The ability of plants to adapt to water deficient conditions in soil is directly related to the competitive ability of each species. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of water deficiency and interspecific competition on the growth components of maize (Zea mays), brachiaria (Urochloa decumbens), and hairy beggarticks (Bidens pilosa L). The experimental design was in randomized blocks, with eight replications. The treatments were arranged in a 5 × 2 factorial design, with the first factor corresponding to the different competitive arrangements among species (maize + U. decumbens, maize + B. pilosa, maize without competition, U. decumbens without competition, and B. pilosa without competition). The second factor constituted two water regimes (daily irrigation and water deficit). The soil water deficient condition strongly decreased maize plant growth; however, it had little or no effect on the growth of weeds U. decumbens and B. pilosa. Interspecific competition decreased the growth of maize plants and U. decumbens, and intensified the negative effects of water deficiency on these species. Interspecific competition and water deficiency also decreased the N, P, and K content in maize plants, which contributed to the effects on plant growth. U. decumbens was more competitive with maize compared to B. pilosa.

[1]  M. Costa,et al.  Interspecific competition changes nutrient : nutrient ratios of weeds and maize , 2019, Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science.

[2]  J. Dombroski,et al.  Competition between cowpea and weeds for water: Effect on plants growth , 2018 .

[3]  B. Choudhury,et al.  Response of water deficit regime and soil amelioration on evapotranspiration loss and water use efficiency of maize (Zea mays l.) in subtropical northeastern Himalayas , 2017, International Journal of Biometeorology.

[4]  N. McDowell,et al.  The role of nutrients in drought-induced tree mortality and recovery. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[5]  José O. Payero,et al.  Comparison of deficit irrigation management strategies on root, plant growth and biomass productivity of silage maize , 2017 .

[6]  J. O. Ferreira,et al.  FATORES QUE CONTRIBUÍRAM PARA O CRESCIMENTO DA PRODUTIVIDADE DO MILHO NO BRASIL , 2016 .

[7]  J. Dinneny,et al.  Growing Out of Stress: The Role of Cell- and Organ-Scale Growth Control in Plant Water-Stress Responses[OPEN] , 2016, Plant Cell.

[8]  Supratim Basu,et al.  Plant adaptation to drought stress , 2016, F1000Research.

[9]  R. Sales,et al.  ESTIMATIVA DAS NECESSIDADES HÍDRICAS DO MILHO CULTIVADO NAS CONDIÇÕES EDAFOCLIMÁTICAS DE SÃO MATEUS – ES , 2016 .

[10]  Donald R Ort,et al.  The Costs of Photorespiration to Food Production Now and in the Future. , 2016, Annual review of plant biology.

[11]  Admar Junior Coletti,et al.  DESEMPENHO E USO EFICIENTE DA TERRA DE MODALIDADES DE CONSORCIAÇÃO COM MILHO E FORRAGEIRAS , 2014 .

[12]  Liliane Maria Romualdo,et al.  Brachiaria species identification using imaging techniques based on fractal descriptors , 2014, ArXiv.

[13]  S. Fukai,et al.  Drought resistance and soil water extraction of a perennial C4 grass: contributions of root and rhizome traits. , 2014, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[14]  A. L. N. Neto,et al.  Morfofisiologia de milho safrinha em espaçamento reduzido e consorciado com Urochloa ruziziensis , 2013 .

[15]  Victor Rueda Ayala,et al.  Determination of the Critical Period for Weed Control in Corn , 2013, Weed Technology.

[16]  I. Madakadze,et al.  Response of weed flora to conservation agriculture systems and weeding intensity in semi-arid Zimbabwe , 2012 .

[17]  M. D. G. Vasconcelos,et al.  INTERFERÊNCIA DE PLANTAS DANINHAS SOBRE PLANTAS CULTIVADAS , 2012 .

[18]  Jeferson Luiz Dallabona Dombroski,et al.  Comparação de métodos de mensuração de área foliar para a cultura da melancia , 2012 .

[19]  L. Galon,et al.  Eficiéncia fotosintética y de uso del agua por malezas , 2010 .

[20]  H. Schenk,et al.  Root competition: beyond resource depletion , 2006 .

[21]  Yuncai Hu,et al.  Drought and salinity: A comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants , 2005 .

[22]  P. Cecon,et al.  Crescimento, teor de partenolídeo e de prolina em plantas de tanacetum parthenium (l.) Schultz-Bip crescidas em substrato com diferentes teores de umidade - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i1.2137 , 2005 .

[23]  Fulai Liu,et al.  Biomass partitioning, specific leaf area, and water use efficiency of vegetable amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) in response to drought stress , 2004 .

[24]  José Barbosa dos Santos,et al.  Ponto de murcha permanente de soja, feijão e plantas daninhas , 2004 .

[25]  M. Hutchings,et al.  TOWARD UNDERSTANDING THE CONSEQUENCES OF SOIL HETEROGENEITY FOR PLANT POPULATIONS AND COMMUNITIES , 2003 .

[26]  J. Conroy,et al.  The effect of drought on plant water use efficiency of nine NAD-ME and nine NADP-ME Australian C4 grasses. , 2002, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[27]  H. Rennenberg,et al.  Drought affects the competitive interactions between Fagus sylvatica seedlings and an early successional species, Rubus fruticosus: responses of growth, water status and δ13C composition , 2001 .

[28]  Clarence J. Swanton,et al.  Understanding maize–weed competition: resource competition, light quality and the whole plant , 2001 .

[29]  B. Chauhan,et al.  Understanding crop-weed-fertilizer-water interactions and their implications for weed management in agricultural systems , 2018 .

[30]  D. Cosgrove Plant cell wall extensibility: connecting plant cell growth with cell wall structure, mechanics, and the action of wall-modifying enzymes. , 2016, Journal of experimental botany.

[31]  A. M. Santos,et al.  Morphophysiology of late season maize at reduced spacing and intercropped with Urochloa ruziziensis. , 2013 .

[32]  Z. Baruch,et al.  Responses to drought of five Brachiaria species. II. Water relations and leaf gas exchange , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[33]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Effects of soil water-deficits during tassel emergence on development and yield component of maize (Zea mays)☆ , 1992 .