Grammatical context constrains lexical competition in spoken word recognition

When perceiving spoken language, listeners must match the incoming acoustic phonetic input to lexical representations in memory. Models that quantify this process propose that the input activates multiple lexical representations in parallel and that these activated representations compete for recognition (Weber & Scharenborg, 2012). In two experiments, we assessed how grammatically constraining contexts alter the process of lexical competition. The results suggest that grammatical context constrains the lexical candidates that are activated to grammatically appropriate competitors. Stimulus words with little competition from items of the same grammatical class benefit more from the addition of grammatical context than do words with more within-class competition. The results provide evidence that top-down contextual information is integrated in the early stages of word recognition. We propose adding a grammatical class level of analysis to existing models of word recognition to account for these findings.

[1]  Julia F. Strand,et al.  Sizing up the competition: quantifying the influence of the mental lexicon on auditory and visual spoken word recognition. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  A. Damasio,et al.  Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  C. Connine Constraints on interactive processes in auditory word recognition: The role of sentence context , 1987 .

[4]  S. Creel,et al.  SIZING UP THE COMPETITION , 1998 .

[5]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[6]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[8]  A. Cutler,et al.  Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon , 1977 .

[9]  Susanne Brouwer,et al.  Speech reductions change the dynamics of competition during spoken word recognition , 2012 .

[10]  R. P. G. Gompel,et al.  Between- and within-language priming is the same: Evidence for shared bilingual syntactic representations , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Mitchell S. Sommers,et al.  The structural organization of the mental lexicon and its contribution to age-related declines in spoken-word recognition. , 1996 .

[12]  D. Isenberg,et al.  A top‐down effect on the identification of function words , 1980 .

[13]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[14]  E. Walker,et al.  Explorations in the biology of language , 1981 .

[15]  P. Dixon Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs , 2008 .

[16]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2008 .

[18]  L. Abrams,et al.  Why a superman cannot help a tsunami: activation of grammatical class influences resolution of young and older adults' tip-of-the-tongue states. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[19]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Malapropisms and the Structure of the Mental , 1977 .

[20]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[21]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Syntactic alignment and shared word order in code-switched sentence production: Evidence from bilingual monologue and dialogue , 2010 .

[22]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Hugo Quené,et al.  On measuring multiple lexical activation using the cross-modal semantic priming technique , 2004 .

[24]  W. Levelt Models of word production , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition. , 1989, Journal of memory and language.

[26]  R. M. Warren Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.

[27]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2013 .

[28]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Linguistic Gender and Spoken-Word Recognition in French , 2000 .

[29]  Michael Garman,et al.  Psycholinguistics: Accessing the mental lexicon , 1990 .

[30]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[31]  S. Cappa,et al.  Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[32]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  Effect of Representational Distance Between Meanings on Recognition of Ambiguous Spoken Words , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[33]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Grammatical Distinctions in the Left Frontal Cortex , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Mitchell Sommers,et al.  There goes the neighborhood: Lipreading and the structure of the mental lexicon , 2011, Speech Commun..

[35]  Julia F Strand,et al.  Phi-square Lexical Competition Database (Phi-Lex): An online tool for quantifying auditory and visual lexical competition , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[36]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech , 2012 .

[37]  Odette Scharenborg,et al.  Models of spoken-word recognition. , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[38]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Time Course of Frequency Effects in Spoken-Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  Immediate effects of form-class constraints on spoken word recognition , 2008, Cognition.

[41]  P. Hagoort On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[43]  A. Friederici Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  D. Pisoni Word Identification in Noise. , 1996, Language and cognitive processes.

[45]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[46]  K. Nation,et al.  The Hardest Butter to Button: Immediate Context Effects in Spoken Word Identification , 2014, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[47]  Lise Abrams,et al.  Syntactic class influences phonological priming of tip-of-the-tongue resolution , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Patterns of dissociation in comprehension and production of nouns and verbs , 1988 .

[50]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[51]  K. Forster,et al.  Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[52]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  Lynne E. Bernstein,et al.  Modeling the interaction of phonemic intelligibility and lexical structure in audiovisual word recognition , 1998, Speech Commun..

[54]  D. Norris,et al.  Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. , 2008, Psychological review.

[55]  Ted J. Strauss,et al.  jTRACE: A reimplementation and extension of the TRACE model of speech perception and spoken word recognition , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[56]  M. Sommers The structural organization of the mental lexicon and its contribution to age-related declines in spoken-word recognition. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[57]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  A Web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[58]  J. Elman,et al.  Effects of event knowledge in processing verbal arguments. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.

[59]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[60]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[61]  Flavia Adani,et al.  Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: towards a grammatically based account. , 2011, Journal of child language.

[62]  Odette Scharenborg,et al.  Models of spoken-word , 2012 .

[63]  G. Kempen,et al.  Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar , 2000, Cognition.

[64]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing , 2003, NeuroImage.