Determination of Clinical Outcome in Mitral Regurgitation With Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Quantification

Background— Surgery for severe mitral regurgitation is indicated if symptoms or left ventricular dilation or dysfunction occur. However, prognosis is already reduced by this stage, and earlier surgery on asymptomatic patients has been advocated if valve repair is likely, but identifying suitable patients for early surgery is difficult. Quantifying the regurgitation may help, but evidence for its link with outcome is limited. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can accurately quantify mitral regurgitation, and we examined whether this was associated with the future need for surgery. Methods and Results— One hundred nine asymptomatic patients with echocardiographic moderate or severe mitral regurgitation had baseline CMR scans and were followed up for up to 8 years (mean, 2.5±1.9 years). CMR quantification accurately identified patients who progressed to symptoms or other indications for surgery: 91% of subjects with regurgitant volume ⩽55 mL survived to 5 years without surgery compared with only 21% with regurgitant volume >55 mL (P<0.0001). A similar separation was observed for regurgitant fraction ⩽40% and >40%. CMR-derived end-diastolic volume index showed a weaker association with outcome (proportions surviving without surgery at 5 years, 90% for left ventricular end-diastolic volume index <100 mL/m2 versus 48% for ≥100 mL/m2) and added little to the discriminatory power of regurgitant fraction/volume alone. Conclusions— CMR quantification of mitral regurgitation was associated with the development of symptoms or other indications for surgery and showed better discriminatory ability than the reference-standard CMR-derived ventricular volumes. CMR may be able to identify appropriate patients for early surgery, with the potential to change clinical practice, although the clinical benefits of early surgery require confirmation in a clinical trial.

[1]  C. Seiler,et al.  Comparison of three-dimensional proximal isovelocity surface area to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for quantifying mitral regurgitation. , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  Roberto Lang,et al.  Discordance between echocardiography and MRI in the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity: a prospective multicenter trial. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[5]  C. Otto,et al.  2014 ACC/AHA valve guidelines: earlier intervention for chronic mitral regurgitation , 2014, Heart.

[6]  C. Vrints,et al.  Assessment of left ventricular volumes and primary mitral regurgitation severity by 2D echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2013, Cardiovascular Ultrasound.

[7]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Right Ventricular Systolic Function in Organic Mitral Regurgitation: Impact of Biventricular Impairment , 2013, Circulation.

[8]  C. Otto,et al.  Prospective Comparison of Valve Regurgitation Quantitation by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[9]  J. Francis,et al.  Aortic Regurgitation Quantification Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Association With Clinical Outcome , 2012, Circulation.

[10]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Mitral Valve Prolapse With Mid-Late Systolic Mitral Regurgitation: Pitfalls of Evaluation and Clinical Outcome Compared With Holosystolic Regurgitation , 2012, Circulation.

[11]  L. Shaw,et al.  Impact of early surgery on survival of patients with severe mitral regurgitation , 2010, Heart.

[12]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Impact of left atrial volume on clinical outcome in organic mitral regurgitation. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  S. Wolff,et al.  Quantification of left ventricular remodeling in response to isolated aortic or mitral regurgitation , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[14]  R. Siegel,et al.  Reproducibility of proximal isovelocity surface area, vena contracta, and regurgitant jet area for assessment of mitral regurgitation severity. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[15]  S. Yun,et al.  Comparison of Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Mitral Regurgitation , 2009, Circulation.

[16]  E. Nagel,et al.  Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: board of trustees task force on standardized protocols , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[17]  David N Firmin,et al.  Flow measurement by magnetic resonance: a unique asset worth optimising. , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[18]  M. Schemper,et al.  Outcome of Watchful Waiting in Asymptomatic Severe Mitral Regurgitation , 2006, Circulation.

[19]  Richard B Devereux,et al.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardio , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[20]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Quantitative determinants of the outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  R. Levine,et al.  American Society of Echocardiography: recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography , 2003 .

[22]  R. Levine,et al.  Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. , 2003, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[23]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Atrial fibrillation complicating the course of degenerative mitral regurgitation: determinants and long-term outcome. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  N. Weissman,et al.  Testing the test: the reliability of echocardiography in the sequential assessment of valvular regurgitation. , 2002, American heart journal.

[25]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Timing of mitral valve surgery , 2002, Heart.

[26]  D J Pennell,et al.  Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? , 2000, European heart journal.

[27]  R. Schlant Timing of surgery for patients with nonischemic severe mitral regurgitation. , 1999, Circulation.

[28]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Impact of preoperative symptoms on survival after surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation: rationale for optimizing surgical indications. , 1999, Circulation.

[29]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Effective mitral regurgitant orifice area: clinical use and pitfalls of the proximal isovelocity surface area method. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  P. Kligfield,et al.  Natural history of the asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic patient with severe mitral regurgitation secondary to mitral valve prolapse and normal right and left ventricular performance. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[31]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Echocardiographic Prediction of Survival After Surgical Correction of Organic Mitral Regurgitation , 1994, Circulation.

[32]  T. Wisenbaugh,et al.  Prediction of outcome after valve replacement for rheumatic mitral regurgitation in the era of chordal preservation. , 1994, Circulation.

[33]  O Henriksen,et al.  Quantification of aortic regurgitation by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. , 1993, American heart journal.

[34]  James B. Seward,et al.  Quantitative Doppler Assessment of Valvular Regurgitation , 1993, Circulation.

[35]  C. Higgins,et al.  Severity of aortic regurgitation: interstudy reproducibility of measurements with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. , 1992, Radiology.

[36]  Sanjiv Kaul,et al.  Prediction of Outcome After Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients With Symptomatic Chronic Mitral Regurgitation: The Importance of Left Atrial Size , 1991, Circulation.

[37]  P. Kligfield,et al.  Mitral regurgitation: relationship of noninvasive descriptors of right and left ventricular performance to clinical and hemodynamic findings and to prognosis in medically and surgically treated patients. , 1986, Circulation.