Topographic Mapping Data Semantics Through Data Conversion and Enhancement

This paper presents research on the semantics of topographic data for triples and ontologies to blend the capabilities of the Semantic Web and The National Map of the U.S. Geological Survey. Automated conversion of relational topographic data of several geographic sample areas to the triple data model standard resulted in relatively poor semantic associations. Further research employed vocabularies of feature type and spatial relation terms. A user interface was designed to model the capture of non-standard terms relevant to public users and to map those terms to existing data models of The National Map through the use of ontology. Server access for the study area triple stores was made publicly available, illustrating how the development of linked data may transform institutional policies to open government data resources to the public. This paper presents these data conversion and research techniques that were tested as open linked data concepts leveraged through a user-centered interface and open USGS server access to the public.

[1]  Marinos Kavouras,et al.  Theories of Geographic Concepts: Ontological Approaches to Semantic Integration , 2007 .

[2]  Dean Allemang,et al.  Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist - Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL, Second Edition , 2011 .

[3]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Semantic (Web) Technology In Action: Ontology Driven Information Systems for Search, Integration and Analysis , 2003, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..

[4]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[5]  David M. Mark,et al.  Landscape Categories in Yindjibarndi: Ontology, Environment, and Language , 2003, COSIT.

[6]  Thomas Gruber,et al.  Ontology of Folksonomy: A Mash-Up of Apples and Oranges , 2007, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[7]  R. Payne Geographic names information system , 1983 .

[8]  L. Sugarbaker,et al.  The National Map , 2011 .

[9]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies: principles, methods and applications , 1996, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[10]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  An agenda for the next generation gazetteer: geographic information contribution and retrieval , 2009, GIS.

[11]  Paul Theerman,et al.  The History of Cartography. Vol. 1: Cartography in Prehistoric, Ancient, and Medieval Europe and the Mediterranean ed. by J. B. Harley, David Woodward (review) , 1990, Technology and Culture.

[12]  E. L. Usery Category Theory and the Structure of Features in Geographic Information Systems , 1993 .

[13]  Miguel Torres Ruiz,et al.  Ontology-Driven Description of Spatial Data for Their Semantic Processing , 2005, GeoS.

[14]  Annette Herskovits Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English , 2009 .

[15]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked data , 2020, Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist.

[16]  Ray Denenberg,et al.  Report from the Joint W3C/IETF URI Planning Interest Group: Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs), URLs, and Uniform Resource Names (URNs): Clarifications and Recommendations , 2002, RFC.

[17]  Michael P. Bishop,et al.  Geographic Information Science and Mountain Geomorphology , 2004 .

[18]  Stephen C. Guptill An enhanced digital line graph design , 1990 .

[19]  D. Varanka A topographic feature taxonomy for a U.S. national topographic mapping ontology , 2009 .

[20]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  N. Guarino,et al.  Formal Ontology in Information Systems : Proceedings of the First International Conference(FOIS'98), June 6-8, Trento, Italy , 1998 .