Accurate identification of motor unit discharge patterns from high-density surface EMG and validation with a novel signal-based performance metric

OBJECTIVE A signal-based metric for assessment of accuracy of motor unit (MU) identification from high-density surface electromyograms (EMG) is introduced. This metric, so-called pulse-to-noise-ratio (PNR), is computationally efficient, does not require any additional experimental costs and can be applied to every MU that is identified by the previously developed convolution kernel compensation technique. APPROACH The analytical derivation of the newly introduced metric is provided, along with its extensive experimental validation on both synthetic and experimental surface EMG signals with signal-to-noise ratios ranging from 0 to 20 dB and muscle contraction forces from 5% to 70% of the maximum voluntary contraction. MAIN RESULTS In all the experimental and simulated signals, the newly introduced metric correlated significantly with both sensitivity and false alarm rate in identification of MU discharges. Practically all the MUs with PNR > 30 dB exhibited sensitivity >90% and false alarm rates <2%. Therefore, a threshold of 30 dB in PNR can be used as a simple method for selecting only reliably decomposed units. SIGNIFICANCE The newly introduced metric is considered a robust and reliable indicator of accuracy of MU identification. The study also shows that high-density surface EMG can be reliably decomposed at contraction forces as high as 70% of the maximum.

[1]  Joshua C. Kline,et al.  Decomposition of surface EMG signals. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  C. J. Luca,et al.  Reply to Farina and Enoka: The Reconstruct-and-Test Approach Is the Most Appropriate Validation for Surface EMG Signal Decomposition to Date , 2011 .

[3]  K C McGill,et al.  Rigorous a Posteriori Assessment of Accuracy in EMG Decomposition , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  Dario Farina,et al.  Decoding the neural drive to muscles from the surface electromyogram , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Dario Farina,et al.  A surface EMG generation model with multilayer cylindrical description of the volume conductor , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Carlo J De Luca,et al.  Decomposition of indwelling EMG signals. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Surface electromyogram analysis of the direction of isometric torque generation by the first dorsal interosseous muscle , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  F. Richmond,et al.  Compartmentalization of motor units in the cat neck muscle, biventer cervicis. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  E. Oja,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2001 .

[10]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  High-yield decomposition of surface EMG signals , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  D. Zazula,et al.  Correlation-based decomposition of surface electromyograms at low contraction forces , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[12]  H. Clamann,et al.  Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press COMPARISON OF THE RECRUITMENT AND DISCHARGE PROPERTIES OF MOTOR UNITS IN H U M A N BRACHIAL BICEPS AND A D D U C T O R POLLICIS D U R I N G ISOMETRIC CONTRACTIONS , 2018 .

[13]  Dario Farina,et al.  Surface EMG decomposition requires an appropriate validation. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  D. Winter,et al.  Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor-unit pools. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  B Mambrito,et al.  A technique for the detection, decomposition and analysis of the EMG signal. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Bert U Kleine,et al.  Inter-operator agreement in decomposition of motor unit firings from high-density surface EMG. , 2008, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[17]  Ákos Jobbágy 5th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering , 2012 .

[18]  D. Farina,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Accuracy in the Identification of Motor Unit Spike Trains From High-Density Surface EMG , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  R. Enoka,et al.  Influence of amplitude cancellation on the simulated surface electromyogram. , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[20]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  Advances in surface EMG: recent progress in detection and processing techniques. , 2010, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[21]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[22]  Damjan Zazula,et al.  Multichannel Blind Source Separation Using Convolution Kernel Compensation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[23]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Analysis of surface EMG baseline for detection of hidden muscle activity. , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[24]  E. Henneman Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge. , 1957, Science.

[25]  A Holobar,et al.  Non-invasive characterization of motor unit behaviour in pathological tremor , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[26]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  EMGLAB: An interactive EMG decomposition program , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  Electromyography. Physiology, engineering and non invasive applications , 2005 .