Catalyst deactivation and engineering control for steam reforming of higher hydrocarbons in a novel membrane reformer

Abstract The catalyst deactivation and reformer performance in a novel circulating fluidized bed membrane reformer (CFBMR) for steam reforming of higher hydrocarbons are investigated using mathematical models. A catalyst deactivation model is developed based on a random carbon deposition mechanism over nickel reforming catalyst. The results show that the reformer has a strong tendency for carbon formation and catalyst deactivation at low steam to carbon feed ratios ( mol/mol ) for high reaction temperatures (>700 K ) and high pressures (>506.5 kPa ) . The trend is similar for the cases without and with hydrogen selective membranes. Based on this preliminary investigation, an engineering control approach, i.e., in-site control with a concept of critical/minimum steam to carbon feed ratio, is proposed and used to determine the carbon deposition free regions for both cases without and with hydrogen membranes. The comparison between the reported data and model simulation shows that the critical steam to carbon feed ratio predicted by the model agrees well with the reported industrial/experimental operating data.

[1]  Said S.E.H. Elnashaie,et al.  Modelling, Simulation and Optimization of Industrial Fixed Bed Catalytic Reactors , 1994 .

[2]  C. H. Bartholomew.  Mechanisms of catalyst deactivation , 2001 .

[3]  A. Voorhies,et al.  Carbon Formation in Catalytic Cracking , 1945 .

[4]  T. Nejat Veziroglu,et al.  A step on the road to Hydrogen Civilization , 2002 .

[5]  Said S.E.H. Elnashaie,et al.  THE COUPLING OF CATALYTIC STEAM REFORMING AND OXIDATIVE REFORMING OF METHANE TO PRODUCE PURE HYDROGEN IN A NOVEL CIRCULATING FAST FLUIDIZATION BED MEMBRANE REFORMER , 2002 .

[6]  T. Borowiecki,et al.  Carbon deposition on Ni/Al2O3 catalysts doped with small amounts of molybdenum , 2000 .

[7]  Giuseppe Barbieri,et al.  Simulation of the methane steam re-forming process in a catalytic Pd-membrane reactor , 1997 .

[8]  J. Armor,et al.  The multiple roles for catalysis in the production of H2 , 1999 .

[9]  Christoph Kern,et al.  Deactivation and regeneration of a naphtha reforming catalyst , 2002 .

[10]  X. Verykios.  Catalytic dry reforming of natural gas for the production of chemicals and hydrogen , 2003 .

[11]  Octave Levenspiel,et al.  Entrainment of solids from fluidized beds I. Hold-up of solids in the freeboard II. Operation of fast fluidized beds , 1990 .

[12]  S. Elnashaie,et al.  Nonmonotonic Behavior in Hydrogen Production from the Steam Reforming of Higher Hydrocarbons in a Circulating Fluidized Bed Membrane Reformer , 2003 .

[13]  Hugo de Lasa,et al.  Fluidizable catalyst for methane reforming , 2001 .

[14]  Caixia Chen,et al.  Numerical simulation of entrained flow coal gasifiers. Part I: modeling of coal gasification in an entrained flow gasifier , 2000 .

[15]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics , 1989 .

[16]  J. Sehested.  Sintering of nickel steam-reforming catalysts , 2003 .

[17]  Tadeusz Borowiecki,et al.  Effects of small MoO3 additions on the properties of nickel catalysts for the steam reforming of hydrocarbons , 1997 .

[18]  Jens R. Rostrup-Nielsen,et al.  Industrial relevance of coking , 1997 .

[19]  Said S.E.H. Elnashaie,et al.  Modeling and optimization of a novel membrane reformer for higher hydrocarbons , 2003 .

[20]  U. Olsbye,et al.  An investigation of the coking properties of fixed and fluid bed reactors during methane-to-synthesis gas reactions , 2002 .

[21]  Thomas Sandahl Christensen,et al.  Adiabatic prereforming of hydrocarbons — an important step in syngas production , 1996 .

[22]  T. R. Phillips,et al.  The kinetics and mechanism of the reaction between steam and hydrocarbons over nickel catalysts in the temperature range 350–500 °C, part 1 , 1969 .

[23]  John R. Grace,et al.  The fluidized bed membrane reactor system: a pilot scale experimental study , 1994 .

[24]  W. Scholz.  Processes for industrial production of hydrogen and associated environmental effects , 1993 .

[25]  John Howard Perry,et al.  Chemical Engineers' Handbook , 1934 .

[26]  D. Trimm.  Control of coking , 1984 .

[27]  D. L Trimm,et al.  Catalysts for the control of coking during steam reforming , 1999 .

[28]  Gilbert F. Froment,et al.  Kinetic Study of the Carbon Filament Formation by Methane Cracking on a Nickel Catalyst , 1997 .

[29]  T. Borowiecki.  Nickel catalysts for steam reforming of hydrocarbons: Direct and indirect factors affecting the coking rate , 1987 .

[30]  Peter B. Tøttrup,et al.  Evaluation of intrinsic steam reforming kinetic parameters from rate measurements on full particle size , 1982 .

[31]  Bernard P. A. Grandjean,et al.  Methane steam reforming in asymmetric Pd- and Pd-Ag/porous SS membrane reactors , 1994 .

[32]  S. W. Ing.  Entrainment of solids from fluidized beds , 1953 .

[33]  P. B. Tottrup,et al.  Kinetics of decomposition of carbon monoxide on a supported nickel catalyst. [Effects of temperature, water, and hydrogen; competition for methanation] , 1976 .

[34]  J. Rostrup-Nielsen.  Coking on nickel catalysts for steam reforming of hydrocarbons , 1974 .

[35]  H. E. Howe.  Industrial and Engineering Chemistry , 1942 .

[36]  Octave Levenspiel,et al.  Circulating fluidized-bed reactors , 1997 .

[37]  A. Datye,et al.  Sintering of Nickel Steam-Reforming Catalysts on MgAl2O4 Spinel Supports , 2001 .

[38]  D. Do,et al.  A unified theory of coking deactivation in a catalyst pellet , 1987 .