No Evidence for Cross-Contextual Consistency in Spatial Cognition or Behavioral Flexibility in a Passerine
暂无分享,去创建一个
John L. Quinn | Michael S. Reichert | Camille A. Troisi | Amy C. Cooke | Gabrielle L. Davidson | Iván de la Hera | M. Reichert | I. Hera | C. Troisi | J. Quinn | G. Davidson
[1] Josh A. Firth,et al. Multiple factors affect discrimination learning performance, but not between-individual variation, in wild mixed-species flocks of birds , 2020, Royal Society Open Science.
[2] S. Healy,et al. The hippocampus, spatial memory and food hoarding: a puzzle revisited. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[3] Judith M Burkart,et al. Validity of Cognitive Tests for Non-human Animals: Pitfalls and Prospects , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.
[4] S. Healy,et al. Differences in cue use and spatial memory in men and women , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[5] Laura A. Kelley,et al. Explanations for variation in cognitive ability: Behavioural ecology meets comparative cognition , 2009, Behavioural Processes.
[6] Ella F Cole,et al. Personality and problem-solving performance explain competitive ability in the wild , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[7] A. Thornton,et al. Individual variation in cognitive performance: developmental and evolutionary perspectives , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[8] Martin Schmelz,et al. Cognitive test batteries in animal cognition research: evaluating the past, present and future of comparative psychometrics , 2017, Animal Cognition.
[9] S. Healy,et al. Spatial accuracy in food-storing and nonstoring birds , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[10] E. Cole,et al. Individual variation in spontaneous problem-solving performance among wild great tits , 2011, Animal Behaviour.
[11] M. Whiteside,et al. A single factor explanation for associative learning performance on colour discrimination problems in common pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) , 2019, Intelligence.
[12] Philippa R. Laker,et al. Intra-individual variation in performance on novel variants of similar tasks influences single factor explanations of general cognitive processes , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.
[13] A. Thornton,et al. Cognitive performance is linked to group size and affects fitness in Australian magpies , 2018, Nature.
[14] John L. Quinn,et al. Who are the innovators? A field experiment with 2 passerine species , 2011 .
[15] RUFOUS HUMMINGBIRDS' (SELASPHORUS RUFUS) MEMORY FOR FLOWERS : PATTERNS OR ACTUAL SPATIAL LOCATIONS? , 1998 .
[16] Jelmer M. Samplonius,et al. The roles of temperature, nest predators and information parasites for geographical variation in egg covering behaviour of tits (Paridae) , 2020, Journal of Biogeography.
[17] S. Peters,et al. Song repertoire size in male song sparrows correlates with detour reaching, but not with other cognitive measures , 2011, Animal Behaviour.
[18] J. Vonk,et al. Spatial memory in captive American black bears (Ursus americanus). , 2012, Journal of comparative psychology.
[19] Martin A. Stoffel,et al. rptR: repeatability estimation and variance decomposition by generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2017 .
[20] Kate V. Morgan,et al. Individual differences in decision making by foraging hummingbirds , 2014, Behavioural Processes.
[21] L. Lefebvre,et al. Problem-solving performance is correlated with reproductive success in a wild bird population , 2013, Animal Behaviour.
[22] Can Kabadayi,et al. The detour paradigm in animal cognition , 2017, Animal Cognition.
[23] R.,et al. Spatial memory of Paridae : comparison of a storing and a non-storing species , the coal tit , Parus ater , and the great tit , P . major , 2006 .
[24] Ella F Cole,et al. Studying the evolutionary ecology of cognition in the wild: a review of practical and conceptual challenges , 2016, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[25] Susan D. Healy,et al. Measuring cognition will be difficult but worth it: a response to comments on Rowe and Healy , 2014 .
[26] Breeding phenology, provisioning behaviour, and unusual patterns of life history variation across an anthropogenic heterogeneous landscape , 2018, Oecologia.
[27] S. Lea,et al. The repeatability of cognitive performance: a meta-analysis , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[28] Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al. Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space , 2005, Cognition.
[29] J. Call,et al. Comparative psychometrics: establishing what differs is central to understanding what evolves , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[30] Louis Lefebvre,et al. What’s flexible in behavioral flexibility? , 2017 .
[31] Kate L. Laskowski,et al. The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis , 2009, Animal Behaviour.
[32] T. W. Pike,et al. Environmentally induced changes to brain morphology predict cognitive performance , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[33] J. Morand‐Ferron,et al. The evolution of cognition in natural populations , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[34] E. Bridge,et al. Smart is the new sexy: female mountain chickadees increase reproductive investment when mated to males with better spatial cognition. , 2019, Ecology letters.
[35] D S Olton,et al. Spatial memory. , 1977, Scientific American.
[36] Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al. Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information , 2007, Animal Cognition.
[37] M. Tomasello,et al. The Structure of Individual Differences in the Cognitive Abilities of Children and Chimpanzees , 2010, Psychological science.
[38] V. Pravosudov,et al. Heritability and the evolution of cognitive traits , 2015 .
[39] B. Sheldon,et al. Data depth, data completeness, and their influence on quantitative genetic estimation in two contrasting bird populations , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[40] E. Cole,et al. Environmental and genetic determinants of innovativeness in a natural population of birds , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[41] David J. Pritchard,et al. Treating hummingbirds as feathered bees: a case of ethological cross-pollination , 2017, Biology Letters.
[42] J. Madden,et al. Performance in cognitive and problem-solving tasks in male spotted bowerbirds does not correlate with mating success , 2013, Animal Behaviour.
[43] A. Thornton,et al. Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds , 2014, Nature.
[44] Alex Thornton,et al. Toward wild psychometrics: linking individual cognitive differences to fitness , 2014 .
[45] S. Healy,et al. Taking an insect-inspired approach to bird navigation , 2018, Learning & Behavior.
[46] Philippa R. Laker,et al. Response learning confounds assays of inhibitory control on detour tasks , 2019, bioRxiv.
[47] A. Thornton,et al. Measuring and understanding individual differences in cognition , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[48] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[49] D. Sherry,et al. Cognition and the brain of brood parasitic cowbirds. , 2019, Integrative zoology.
[50] S. Peters,et al. Potential trade-off between vocal ornamentation and spatial ability in a songbird , 2013, Biology Letters.
[51] Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al. How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces , 2006, Animal Cognition.
[52] Individual Differences in Long-term Cognitive Testi ng in a Group of Captive Chimpanzees , 2011 .
[53] Jason Keagy,et al. Male satin bowerbird problem-solving ability predicts mating success , 2009, Animal Behaviour.
[54] Daniel R. Montello,et al. Scale and Multiple Psychologies of Space , 1993, COSIT.
[55] S. Healy,et al. Spatial memory of paridae: comparison of a storing and a non-storing species, the coal tit, Parus ater, and the great tit, P. major , 1990, Animal Behaviour.
[56] Maria C. Tello-Ramos,et al. Memory in wild mountain chickadees from different elevations: comparing first-year birds with older survivors , 2018, Animal Behaviour.
[57] N. Clayton,et al. Wild psychometrics: evidence for ‘general’ cognitive performance in wild New Zealand robins, Petroica longipes , 2015, Animal Behaviour.
[58] Geoffrey Hall,et al. Animal cognition , 1985, Nature.
[59] Susan D. Healy,et al. Spatial Learning and Memory in Birds , 2004, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.
[60] A. Guenther,et al. Individual consistency in multiple cognitive performance: behavioural versus cognitive syndromes , 2017, Animal Behaviour.
[61] Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al. Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[62] T. A. Hurly,et al. Wild hummingbirds require a consistent view of landmarks to pinpoint a goal location , 2018, Animal Behaviour.
[63] M. J. Emerson,et al. The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.
[64] Lars Chittka,et al. The correlation of learning speed and natural foraging success in bumble-bees , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[65] A. Hinks,et al. Cognitive Ability Influences Reproductive Life History Variation in the Wild , 2012, Current Biology.
[66] Philippa R. Laker,et al. Heritability and correlations among learning and inhibitory control traits , 2020, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.
[67] T. Robbins,et al. Inhibition and impulsivity: Behavioral and neural basis of response control , 2013, Progress in Neurobiology.
[68] J. Mappes,et al. Investigating Müllerian mimicry: predator learning and variation in prey defences , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[69] Xavier A. Harrison,et al. Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution , 2014, PeerJ.
[70] D. Kelly,et al. Individual performance across motoric self-regulation tasks are not correlated for pet dogs , 2018, Learning & Behavior.
[71] Susan D. Healy,et al. Measuring variation in cognition , 2014 .
[72] Joah R Madden,et al. Do detour tasks provide accurate assays of inhibitory control? , 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[73] S. Peters,et al. Song learning and cognitive ability are not consistently related in a songbird , 2017, Animal Cognition.
[74] D. Bates,et al. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.
[75] L. Huber,et al. Measures of Dogs' Inhibitory Control Abilities Do Not Correlate across Tasks , 2017, Front. Psychol..
[76] Allison M. Barnard,et al. The evolution of self-control , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[77] Evan L. MacLean,et al. Context specificity of inhibitory control in dogs , 2013, Animal Cognition.
[78] Anthony E. Richardson,et al. Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning , 2006 .
[79] C. Rutz,et al. How STRANGE are your study animals? , 2020, Nature.
[80] D. Wheatcroft,et al. Great tit responses to the calls of an unfamiliar species suggest conserved perception of call ordering , 2020, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[81] E. Bridge,et al. Natural Selection and Spatial Cognition in Wild Food-Caching Mountain Chickadees , 2019, Current Biology.