Is ontology-based activity recognition really effective?

While most activity recognition systems rely on data-driven approaches, the use of knowledge-driven techniques is gaining increasing interest. Research in this field has mainly concentrated on the use of ontologies to specify the semantics of activities, and ontological reasoning to recognize them based on context information. However, at the time of writing, the experimental evaluation of these techniques is limited to computational aspects; their actual effectiveness is still unknown. As a first step to fill this gap, in this paper, we experimentally evaluate the effectiveness of the ontological approach, using an activity dataset collected in a smart-home setting. Preliminary results suggest that existing ontological techniques underperform data-driven ones, mainly because they lack support for reasoning with temporal information. Indeed, we show that, when ontological techniques are extended with even simple forms of temporal reasoning, their effectiveness is comparable to the one of a state-of-the-art technique based on Hidden Markov Models. Then, we indicate possible research directions to further improve the effectiveness of ontology-based activity recognition through temporal reasoning.

[1]  Claudio Bettini,et al.  Efficient profile aggregation and policy evaluation in a middleware for adaptive mobile applications , 2008, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[2]  Gwenn Englebienne,et al.  Accurate activity recognition in a home setting , 2008, UbiComp.

[3]  Svetha Venkatesh,et al.  Activity recognition and abnormality detection with the switching hidden semi-Markov model , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[4]  Claudio Bettini,et al.  Hybrid reasoning in the CARE middleware for context awareness , 2009, Int. J. Web Eng. Technol..

[5]  Enrico Franconi,et al.  A survey of temporal extensions of description logics , 2001, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[6]  Boris Motik,et al.  OWL 2: The next step for OWL , 2008, J. Web Semant..

[7]  David C. Hogg,et al.  Learning Variable-Length Markov Models of Behavior , 2001, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[8]  Claudio Bettini,et al.  COSAR: hybrid reasoning for context-aware activity recognition , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[9]  Carsten Lutz,et al.  A Tableau Algorithm for Description Logics with Concrete Domains and General TBoxes , 2007, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[10]  Chris D. Nugent,et al.  Ontology-based activity recognition in intelligent pervasive environments , 2009, Int. J. Web Inf. Syst..

[11]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a Web Ontology Language , 2003, J. Web Semant..