Symposium Corpus d'apprentissage en ligne : Conception, réutilisation, échange

Pour ameliorer la visibilite et la validite des travaux dans le domaine de l'apprentissage en ligne, pour permettre la discussion scientifique en profondeur sur les analyses, la comparaison des methodes, des outils ou meme des resultats, il manque bien souvent l'acces aux donnees du corpus initial. Le besoin d'echange de corpus existait dans d'autres domaines avant que nous l'exprimions comme un axe de methodologie de recherche dans le domaine de l'apprentissage en ligne. Mais les objets consideres dans les collections (en TALN par exemple) sont bien moins complexes (tablettes, textes, livres, enregistrement de conversations telephoniques, etc.) et plus homogenes. Construire un corpus issu d'une experimentation d'apprentissage en ligne suggere de synchroniser et relier de nombreux fragments de donnees (traces d'acces, d'interactions, productions, tests, entretiens, etc.) pour qu'ils puissent faire sens dans une analyse des interactions a posteriori. Ce defi methodologique a recu recemment une reconnaissance scientifique a travers le projet Mulce (http://mulce.univ-fcomte.fr) par le soutien de l'Agence Nationale pour la Recherche. Pour progresser dans cette voie et susciter l'interet de cet axe methodologique, nous organisons cet atelier pratique (symposium) invitant des chercheurs d'horizons divers pour ausculter les types de donnees recueillies, les outils et methodes de traitement et d'analyse en vue de construire des corpus echangeables pour qu'ils puissent etre traites par chacun.

[1]  Andreas Papasalouros,et al.  A Model for Interoperability in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning , 2006, Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06).

[2]  Silvia Hansen,et al.  Developments in the TIGER Annotation Scheme and their Realization in the Corpus , 2002, LREC.

[3]  Nikolaos Avouris,et al.  Modelling interaction during small-group synchronous problem-solving activities: The Synergo approach . , 2004 .

[4]  Katrin Erk,et al.  A Powerful and Versatile XML Format for Representing Role-semantic Annotation , 2004, LREC.

[5]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[6]  P. Resnik.  Treebanks : Building and Using Parsed Corpora , 2022 .

[7]  Helmut Schmidt,et al.  Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees , 1994 .

[8]  C. Heath,et al.  Body movement and speech in medical interaction: Postscript: the use of medical records and computers during the consultation , 1986 .

[9]  Sean Wallis,et al.  Completing parsed corpora: from correction to evolution , 2003 .

[10]  Laurent Romary,et al.  The Reference Annotation Framework: A case for semantic content representation , 2005 .

[11]  Nikolaos M. Avouris,et al.  An environment for studying collaborative learning activities , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[12]  David McKelvie,et al.  Hyperlink semantics for standoff markup of read-only documents , 1997 .

[13]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Architectures for computer supported collaborative learning , 2001, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[14]  Nikolaos Avouris,et al.  Teaching Algorithms in Secondary Education: A Collaborative Approach , 2004 .

[15]  Katrin Gaßner.  Diskussionen als Szenario zur Ko-Konstruktion von Wissen mit visuellen Sprachen , 2003 .

[16]  Adam Kilgarriff,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on the Web as Corpus , 2003, CL.

[17]  Nikol Rummel,et al.  A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[18]  Nikol Rummel,et al.  A new method to assess the quality of collaborative process in CSCL , 2005, CSCL.

[19]  Caroline Gasperin,et al.  COREFERENCE AND ANAPHORIC RELATIONS OF DEMONSTRATIVE NOUN PHRASES IN MULTILINGUAL CORPUS , 2005 .

[20]  Nancy Ide,et al.  International Standard for a Linguistic Annotation Framework , 2003, Natural Language Engineering.

[21]  Nikolaos Avouris,et al.  Method and tools for analysis of collaborative problem-solving activities , 2004 .

[22]  Inderjeet Mani,et al.  Annotating temporal information: from theory to practice , 2002 .

[23]  Laurent Romary,et al.  Codage des références et coréférences dans les DHM , 1997 .

[24]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[25]  Sten R. Ludvigsen,et al.  Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments (Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series) , 2004 .

[26]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned , 1995 .

[27]  WinogradTerry.  A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work , 1987 .

[28]  Nikolaos M. Avouris,et al.  Heterogeneity of learning material in synchronous computer-supported collaborative modelling , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Nikolaos Avouris,et al.  Usability evaluation of handheld devices: A case study for a museum application , 2005 .

[30]  Lars Bollen,et al.  Is There a Way to e-Bologna? Cross-National Collaborative Activities in University Courses , 2006, EC-TEL.

[31]  E. Bick.  PSG hybrid approach to automatic corpus annotation , 2003 .

[32]  Agnès Tutin,et al.  Constitution and Exploitation of an Annotation System of Electronic Corpora: Toward Automatic Generation of Understandable Pronouns in French Language , 2000, Natural Language Processing.

[33]  Geoffrey Leech.  Corpus Annotation Schemes , 1993 .

[34]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning in the Space of Debate , 2003, CSCL.

[35]  Lucas P. J. J. Noldus,et al.  The Observer: A software system for collection and analysis of observational data , 1991 .

[36]  A. Martínez,et al.  An Xml-based Representation of Collaborative Interaction , 2002 .

[37]  Nikolaos M. Avouris,et al.  On analysis of collaborative problem solving: an object-oriented approach , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Renata Vieira,et al.  From manual to automatic annotation of coreference , 2003 .

[39]  O. Bertelsen,et al.  Activity Theory , 2003 .

[40]  Yannis A. Dimitriadis,et al.  Mystery in the museum: collaborative learning activities using handheld devices , 2005, Mobile HCI.

[41]  Gregory Grefenstette,et al.  Web as Corpus , 2003 .

[42]  Jean-Jacques Girardot,et al.  DREW : A Dialogical Reasoning Web Tool , 2002 .

[43]  Prasun Dewan.  Multiuser architectures , 1995, EHCI.

[44]  Mark Liberman,et al.  A formal framework for linguistic annotation , 1999, Speech Commun..

[45]  Laurent Romary,et al.  Encoding Syntactic Annotation , 2003 .

[46]  Terry Winograd,et al.  A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work , 1986, CSCW '86.

[47]  Nikolaos M. Avouris,et al.  Collaborative problem solving using an open modeling environment , 2002, CSCL.

[48]  Joëlle Coutaz,et al.  From single-user architectural design to PAC*: a generic software architecture model for CSCW , 1997, CHI.

[49]  Nancy Ide,et al.  A Registry of Standard Data Categories for Linguistic Annotation , 2004, LREC.

[50]  Nikolaos M. Avouris,et al.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Concept Mapping: Study of Synchronous Peer Interaction , 2002, Education and Information Technologies.