Self-Rotation of Cells in an Irrotational AC E-Field in an Opto-Electrokinetics Chip

The use of optical dielectrophoresis (ODEP) to manipulate microparticles and biological cells has become increasingly popular due to its tremendous flexibility in providing reconfigurable electrode patterns and flow channels. ODEP enables the parallel and free manipulation of small particles on a photoconductive surface on which light is projected, thus eliminating the need for complex electrode design and fabrication processes. In this paper, we demonstrate that mouse cells comprising melan-a cells, RAW 267.4 macrophage cells, peripheral white blood cells and lymphocytes, can be manipulated in an opto-electrokinetics (OEK) device with appropriate DEP parameters. Our OEK device generates a non-rotating electric field and exerts a localized DEP force on optical electrodes. Hitherto, we are the first group to report that among all the cells investigated, melan-a cells, lymphocytes and white blood cells were found to undergo self-rotation in the device in the presence of a DEP force. The rotational speed of the cells depended on the voltage and frequency applied and the cells' distance from the optical center. We discuss a possible mechanism for explaining this new observation of induced self-rotation based on the physical properties of cells. We believe that this rotation phenomenon can be used to identify cell type and to elucidate the dielectric and physical properties of cells.

[1]  Gwo-Bin Lee,et al.  Image-driven cell manipulation , 2009, IEEE Nanotechnology Magazine.

[2]  Wen Jung Li,et al.  Self-induced rotation of pigmented cells by dielectrophoretic force field , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[3]  Junha Park,et al.  Microfabricated fluorescence-activated cell sorter through hydrodynamic flow manipulation , 2006 .

[4]  Hsueh-Chia Chang,et al.  Long-Range AC Electroosmotic Trapping and Detection of Bioparticles , 2005 .

[5]  Gwo-Bin Lee,et al.  An integrated cell counting and continuous cell lysis device using an optically induced electric field , 2010 .

[6]  M.C. Wu,et al.  Cell addressing and trapping using novel optoelectronic tweezers , 2004, 17th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. Maastricht MEMS 2004 Technical Digest.

[7]  J. Voldman,et al.  High-throughput cell and particle characterization using isodielectric separation. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[8]  K. Shirahige,et al.  Progression of cell cycle monitored by dielectric spectroscopy and flow‐cytometric analysis of DNA content , 2000, Yeast.

[9]  Rashid Bashir,et al.  Dielectrophoresis-based cell manipulation using electrodes on a reusable printed circuit board. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[10]  T. Tsong,et al.  Dielectrophoresis and electrorotation of neurospora slime and murine myeloma cells. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[11]  J. Vienken,et al.  Rotation of cells in an alternating electric field theory and experimental proof , 2005, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[12]  Arnan Mitchell,et al.  Active control of silver nanoparticles spacing using dielectrophoresis for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  Klas Hjort,et al.  Microfluidic high viability neural cell separation using viscoelastically tuned hydrodynamic spreading , 2008, Biomedical microdevices.

[14]  Wenfeng Liang,et al.  Inducing self-rotation of Melan-a cells by ODEP , 2012, 2012 7th IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (NEMS).

[15]  Yuan-Li Liang,et al.  Cell rotation using optoelectronic tweezers. , 2010, Biomicrofluidics.

[16]  A. Heeger,et al.  Selection of mammalian cells based on their cell-cycle phase using dielectrophoresis , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Olga A. Gritsai,et al.  Mononuclear cells morphology for cells discrimination by the angular structure of scattered light , 2007 .

[18]  Y. Huang,et al.  Differences in the AC electrodynamics of viable and non-viable yeast cells determined through combined dielectrophoresis and electrorotation studies. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Hsueh-Chia Chang,et al.  Electrokinetic transport of red blood cells in microcapillaries , 2002, Electrophoresis.

[20]  Yuechao Wang,et al.  Limitations of Au Particle Nanoassembly Using Dielectrophoretic Force—A Parametric Experimental and Theoretical Study , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[21]  J. Sturm,et al.  Deterministic hydrodynamics: Taking blood apart , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Gregory T. Roman,et al.  Single-cell manipulation and analysis using microfluidic devices , 2006, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[23]  Wenfeng Liang,et al.  An equivalent electrical model for numerical analyses of ODEP manipulation , 2011, 2011 6th IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems.

[24]  Gwo-Bin Lee,et al.  A microfluidic device for separation of amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells utilizing louver-array structures , 2009, Biomedical microdevices.

[25]  D. Bennett,et al.  A line of non‐tumorigenic mouse melanocytes, syngeneic with the B16 melanoma and requiring a tumour promoter for growth , 1987, International journal of cancer.

[26]  Hywel Morgan,et al.  AC ELECTROKINETICS: COLLOIDS AND NANOPARTICLES. , 2002 .