An in vitro protocol for evaluation and comparison of membrane oxygenators.

With the trend in open heart surgery toward normothermic bypass and warm blood cardioplegia, greater demand is being placed on the perfusionist to select an oxygenator that will perform safely and efficiently under a variety of conditions. While manufacturers report performance parameters for their products, the data is often not comparable due to widely differing conditions. Recent in vitro evaluation techniques employed to characterize membrane oxygenators do not simulate the actual oxygenator conditions observed during cardiopulmonary bypass. Biocompatibility and drug delivery are reported but comparisons of different oxygenator performance parameters are not completely addressed. We have designed a test circuit and an evaluation protocol to simultaneously characterize the performance of multiple oxygenators under identical conditions. The test circuit is designed to simulate clinical conditions and to evaluate gas exchange, blood path pressures, gas path pressures, and hemolysis. Previously reported studies have relied on a comparison of a single membrane oxygenator and a single bubble oxygenator. Our protocol will compare multiple membrane oxygenators, in vitro, under similar clinically relevant conditions. Such testing would be done prior to animal or clinical trials. Furthermore in vitro tests should be more reproducible and more discriminating than are ex vivo tests.

[1]  D. Rosen,et al.  In vitro variability in fentanyl absorption by different membrane oxygenators. , 1990, Journal of cardiothoracic anesthesia.

[2]  E. Berger The physiology of adequate perfusion , 1979 .

[3]  A. Bochenek,et al.  Biocompatibility of extracorporeal circulation with autooxygenation. , 1992, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[4]  R A DEVLOO,et al.  ANESTHESIA FOR CARDIAC SURGERY. , 1965, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[5]  Pearson Dt Gas exchange: bubble and membrane oxygenators. , 1990 .

[6]  J. Gaylor,et al.  An in Vitro Technique to assess Oxygenator Potential for Respiratory Failure Therapies , 1991, The International journal of artificial organs.

[7]  Scientific,et al.  Physiological and clinical aspects of oxygenator design : proceedings of the Seminar on Advances in Oxygenator Design, Copenhagen, June 15-20, 1975 , 1976 .

[8]  T. Kolobow,et al.  Artificial lung (oxygenators). , 1986, Artificial organs.

[9]  J. H. Gibbon,et al.  Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. , 1954, Minnesota medicine.