Two Modalities of the Contextualized Courseware in Three Modalities of Classroom Use.

This study investigated the effect of various combinations of contextualization and teacher support on achievement and critical thinking. Two specially-designed sets of courseware were used to teach a unit on logic, one based on a single context and one based on multiple contexts. The participants were 151 9 graders in two vocational high schools. Each student was assigned to one of four groups: The first group used the multiplecontext courseware with a teacher tutorial; the second group used the single-context courseware; the third group studied the single context courseware with a teacher tutorial; and the fourth group had a teacher tutorial only. Statistical analysis of two achievement tests on the unit and a critical thinking disposition inventory revealed that, regardless of whether the courseware employed single or multiple contexts, teacher support is beneficial. Findings are discussed in relation to comparable studies reported in the literature. Further research issues are raised in the last section.

[1]  J. Greeno.  THE SITUATIVITY OF KNOWING, LEARNING, AND RESEARCH , 1998 .

[2]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[3]  E. Soloway,et al.  Enacting Project-Based Science , 1997, The Elementary School Journal.

[4]  T. Boyle.  Towards a Theoretical Base for Educational Multimedia Design , 2002 .

[5]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .

[6]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Steven M. Smith.  Environmental context—dependent memory. , 1988 .

[8]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Environmental context and human memory , 1978 .

[9]  Susan M. Williams,et al.  Putting Case-Based Instruction Into Context: Examples From Legal and Medical Education , 1992 .

[10]  H. Simon.  Learning with understanding , 1971 .

[11]  Steven M. Smith.  Effects of number of study environments and learning instructions on free-recall clustering and accuracy , 1985 .

[12]  C. Morris,et al.  Screencasts: How effective are they and how do students engage with them? , 2014 .

[13]  Kent M. Dallett,et al.  Contextual stimuli and proactive inhibition , 1968 .

[14]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[15]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Context-Dependent Human Extinction Memory Is Mediated by a Ventromedial Prefrontal and Hippocampal Network , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Loon,et al.  The impact of critical thinking disposition on learning using business simulations , 2015 .

[17]  Takashi Kusumi,et al.  Effect of Critical Thinking Disposition on Interpretation of Controversial Issues : Evaluating Evidences and Drawing Conclusions , 2004 .

[18]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  Placing Physics Problems in Real-Life Context: Students' Reactions and Performance. , 1996 .

[19]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Robert H. Ennis.  A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills. , 1985 .

[21]  D. Godden,et al.  Context-dependent memory in two natural environments : On land under water , 1975 .

[22]  M. David Merrill,et al.  Integrative goals for instructional design , 1990 .

[23]  Gita Taasoobshirazi,et al.  A review and critique of context-based physics instruction and assessment , 2008 .

[24]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Cognitive Ability, Thinking Dispositions, and Instructional Set as Predictors of Critical Thinking. , 2007 .

[25]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. , 1989 .

[26]  Rita C. Richey,et al.  The role of context in learning and instructional design , 1997 .

[27]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Transfer of training principles for instructional design , 1985 .

[28]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. , 1996 .

[29]  A. Rayner.  Reflections on context-based science teaching: a case study of physics for students of physiotherapy , 2012 .

[30]  J. Desmond,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and recognition memory. Functional-MRI evidence for context-dependent retrieval processes. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  Yair Neuman,et al.  The effect of contextual factors on the judgement of informal reasoning fallacies , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  Barry K. Beyer,et al.  Developing a thinking skills program , 1987 .

[33]  Miriam Bassok,et al.  Two types of reliance on correlations between content and structure in reasoning about word problems. , 1997 .

[34]  F. A,et al.  The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking : Its Character , Measurement , and Relationship to Critical Thinking Skill , 2007 .

[35]  David C. Webb,et al.  Learning by Understanding: The Role of Multiple Representations in Learning Algebra , 1995 .

[36]  Lynne M Reder,et al.  Procedural learning and associative memory mechanisms contribute to contextual cueing: Evidence from fMRI and eye-tracking. , 2012, Learning & memory.

[37]  V. Kaptelinin,et al.  Acting with Technology , 2008 .

[38]  Pinchas Tamir,et al.  The Effect of the Biology Critical Thinking Project on the Development of Critical Thinking. , 1994 .

[39]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Some Benefits of Creating Macro-Contexts for Science Instruction: Initial Findings , 1987 .

[40]  J. McPeck.  Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: A Reply to Ennis , 1990 .

[41]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Representation sequencing in computer-based engineering education , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Cynthia Geer,et al.  Teaching for Understanding , 1990 .