Categorisation of ‘perceptual’ and ‘premotor’ neglect patients across different tasks: is there strong evidence for a dichotomy?

The aim of the presented studies was to investigate whether classifications of neglect patients into perceptual (i.e. identifying a patient as suffering from mainly attentional/space representation deficits) and premotor (judging the main impairment to be related towards actions into contralesional space) categories is consistent across different line bisection assessment techniques that have, in the past, been designed to tease these potentially overlapping aspects of hemispatial neglect apart. Twelve patients with hemispatial neglect and three control groups were tested with the Overhead Task, adapted from Nico [Neuropsychologia 34 (1996) 471] in which patients were asked to bisect lines that were mirror reversed, the Pulley Device Technique, adapted from Bisiach et al. [Neurology 40 (1990) 1278] in which they had to perform a movement opposite to the direction of the transaction mark that bisected the line and the Landmark Test, adapted from Milner et al. [Neuropsychologia 30 (1992) 515] in which they had to manually point to the half of a centrally pre-bisected line that, to them, appeared shorter. The specific question was whether these three tasks would categorise the same set of patients in the same way?Most patients could be classified into either the premotor or perceptual category in each task, but no consistent categorisation emerged across the three techniques. Just 1 out of the 12 patients, was consistently classified across all three tasks. It seemed that despite the fact that all tasks essentially required a line bisection response, the perceptual and motor differences between the tasks were still great enough to result in inconsistent classifications. The Landmark Task classified the majority of patients into the perceptual neglect category, while the Overhead and Pulley Device Techniques tended to identify more patients as suffering from a premotor deficit (albeit not the same set of patients).

[1]  A. Milner,et al.  Distortion of size perception in visuospatial neglect , 1995, Current Biology.

[2]  G. Powell,et al.  A very short version of the Minnesota Aphasia Test. , 1980, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[3]  A. Milner,et al.  Line bisection errors in visual neglect: Misguided action or size distortion? , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  R. Sterzi,et al.  Directional hypokinesia in spatial hemineglect: a case study. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  John C. Marshall,et al.  Spatial neglect : position papers on theory and practice , 1994 .

[6]  K. Booth,et al.  The Neglect Syndrome , 1982, Journal of neurosurgical nursing.

[7]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Motor role of human inferior parietal lobe revealed in unilateral neglect patients , 1998, Nature.

[8]  A. Benton Contributions to Neuropsychological Assessment: A Clinical Manual , 1983 .

[9]  J. Marshall,et al.  Within- and Between-Task Dissociations in Visuo-Spatial Neglect: A Case Study , 1995, Cortex.

[10]  K M Heilman,et al.  Directional hypokinesia and hemispatial inattention in neglect. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  S. Rapcsak,et al.  Changes in sensory inattention, directional motor neglect and “release” of the fixation reflex following a unilateral frontal lesion: A case report , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  D L Na,et al.  Dissociation of sensory-attentional from motor-intentional neglect , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  Roberto Cubelli,et al.  Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  G. Dellatolas,et al.  Visual and motor components in simple line bisection: an investigation in normal adults. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  H. Nelson,et al.  Dementia: The Estimation of Premorbid Intelligence Levels Using the New Adult Reading Test , 1978, Cortex.

[16]  M. Mesulam A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[17]  John C. Marshall,et al.  Individual variation in line bisection: A study of four patients with right hemisphere damage and normal controls , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Dissociated neglect behavior following sequential strokes in the right hemisphere , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[19]  Edoardo Bisiach,et al.  Challenging current accounts of unilateral neglect , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Duk L. Na,et al.  Analysis of Primary and Secondary Influences on Spatial Neglect , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  K. Heilman,et al.  Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect , 1979, Annals of neurology.

[22]  Edoardo Bisiach,et al.  Line bisection and cognitive plasticity of unilateral neglect of space , 1983, Brain and Cognition.

[23]  A. Wolffe Gene Regulation: Insulating chromatin , 1994, Current Biology.

[24]  Edoardo Bisiach,et al.  Perceptual and Response Bias in Unilateral Neglect: Two Modified Versions of the Milner Landmark Task , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[25]  M. Mesulam Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  M. L. Rusconi,et al.  Perceptual and premotor factors of unilateral neglect , 1990, Neurology.

[27]  John C. Marshall,et al.  Left Visuo-Spatial Neglect: A Meaningless Entity? , 1992, Cortex.

[28]  R. Tegnér,et al.  Through a looking glass. A new technique to demonstrate directional hypokinesia in unilateral neglect. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  T Krämer-McCaffery Investigation into the distinction between perceptual and premotor types of visual neglect. , 1999 .

[30]  A. Milner,et al.  To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  A. Milner,et al.  An Investigation of Hemispatial Neglect Using the Landmark Task , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[33]  Km. Heilmann,et al.  The neglect syndrome , 1985 .

[34]  C. Umilta,et al.  The role of right side objects in left side neglect: A dissociation between perceptual and directional motor neglect , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Daniele Nico,et al.  Detecting directional hypokinesia: The epidiascope technique , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  J. Mattingley,et al.  The effects of competition and motor reprogramming on visuomotor selection in unilateral neglect , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  A. Milner,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of spatial neglect , 1994 .

[38]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Distinguishing Sensory and Motor Deficits After Parietal Damage: An Evaluation of Response Selection Biases in Unilateral Neglect , 1997 .