Apes' and children's understanding of cooperative and competitive motives in a communicative situation.

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) (Study 1) and 18- and 24-month-old human children (Study 2) participated in a novel communicative task. A human experimenter (E) hid food or a toy in one of two opaque containers before gesturing towards the reward's location in one of two ways. In the Informing condition, she attempted to help the subject find the hidden object by simply pointing to the correct container. In the Prohibiting condition, E held out her arm toward the correct container (palm out) and told the subject firmly 'Don't take this one.' As in previous studies, the apes were at chance in the Informing condition. However, they were above chance in the new Prohibiting condition. Human 18-month-olds showed this same pattern of results, whereas 24-month-olds showed the opposite pattern: they were better in the Informing condition than in the Prohibiting condition. In our interpretation, success in the Prohibiting condition requires subjects to understand E's goal toward them and their behavior, and then to make an inference (she would only prohibit if there were something good in there). Success in the Informing condition requires subjects to understand a cooperative communicative motive - which apparently apes and young infants find difficult.

[1]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  What Chimpanzees Know about Seeing, Revisited: An Explanation of the Third Kind , 2005 .

[2]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Distinguishing intentional from accidental actions in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and human children (Homo sapiens). , 1998, Journal of comparative psychology.

[3]  D. Povinelli,et al.  Specificity of gaze-following in young chimpanzees , 1997 .

[4]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Unwilling versus unable: infants' understanding of intentional action. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[5]  David A. Leavens,et al.  Understanding the Point of Chimpanzee Pointing , 2005, Current directions in psychological science.

[6]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  'Unwilling' versus 'unable': chimpanzees' understanding of human intentional action. , 2004, Developmental science.

[7]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Communication of Food Location Between Human and Dog ( Canis Familiaris ) , 1998 .

[8]  T. Walden,et al.  The development of social referencing. , 1988, Child development.

[9]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  Shoji Itakura,et al.  An exploratory study of gaze‐monitoring in nonhuman primates1 , 1996 .

[11]  D. Povinelli,et al.  Comprehension of seeing as a referential act in young children, but not juvenile chimpanzees , 1999 .

[12]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Understanding other minds : perspectives from autism , 1994 .

[13]  D. Povinelli,et al.  Chimpanzees’ (Pan troglodytes) use of gaze cues in object-choice tasks: different methods yield different results , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[14]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Chimpanzees are more skilful in competitive than in cooperative cognitive tasks , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Comprehension of novel communicative signs by apes and human children. , 1997, Child development.

[17]  James R. Anderson,et al.  USE OF EXPERIMENTER-GIVEN MANUAL AND FACIAL CUES BY GORILLAS (GORILLA GORILLA) IN AN OBJECT-CHOICE TASK , 1999 .

[18]  M. Tomasello,et al.  One-year-olds comprehend the communicative intentions behind gestures in a hiding game. , 2005, Developmental science.

[19]  D. Povinelli,et al.  Chimpanzees: Joint Visual Attention , 1996 .

[20]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .

[21]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Chimpanzee gaze following in an object-choice task , 1998, Animal Cognition.

[22]  Y. Lacasse,et al.  From the authors , 2005, European Respiratory Journal.

[23]  Daniel J. Povinelli,et al.  Exploitation of pointing as a referential gesture in young children, but not adolescent chimpanzees , 1997 .

[24]  MICHAEL TOMASELLO,et al.  Five primate species follow the visual gaze of conspecifics , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs , 1998, Animal Cognition.

[26]  Hans Paul Guth.  The uses of language , 1970 .

[27]  M. Tomasello,et al.  The emergence of social cognition in three young chimpanzees. , 2005, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[28]  S. Baron-Cohen.  Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind , 1997 .

[29]  Brian Hare,et al.  Can competitive paradigms increase the validity of experiments on primate social cognition? , 2001, Animal Cognition.

[30]  Juan Carlos Gómez,et al.  “Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes: The emergence of intentional communication as a problem-solving strategy in the gorilla , 1990 .

[31]  S. Waxman,et al.  Words and gestures: infants' interpretations of different forms of symbolic reference. , 1998, Child development.

[32]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  The Domestication of Social Cognition in Dogs , 2002, Science.

[33]  K. Gibson,et al.  “Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes: Comparative developmental perspectives on ape “language” , 1990 .

[34]  Richard Jenkins.  Uses of language , 2006 .

[35]  Adam Kendon,et al.  'Language' and Intelligence in Monkeys and Apes: Comparative Developmental Perspectives. , 1992 .

[36]  J. Gomez.  Apes, Monkeys, Children, and the Growth of Mind , 2004 .

[37]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic Dogs (Canis familiaris) Use Human and Conspecific Social Cues to Locate Hidden Food , 1999 .

[38]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Cues that chimpanzees do and do not use to find hidden objects , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[39]  Teresa McCormack,et al.  Joint attention : communication and other minds : issues in philosophy and psychology , 2005 .