A new spray-type adhesion barrier (AdSpray) improves condition for surgical treatment in the reversal of Hartmann procedure

Abstract Rationale: Hartmann procedure (HP) often causes severe postoperative adhesions in the pelvic space; therefore, the reversal of Hartmann procedure (RHP) is a challenging surgery. A new spray-type antiadhesion agent, AdSpray, has been reported to be useful in three-dimensional fields such as the liver. However, there are no reports of its use in HP. We present a case of a male patient with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic HP with AdSpray to prevent postoperative adhesions. Patient concerns: A 52-year-old man presented with melena and constipation. Diagnosis: Colonoscopy revealed an almost obstructive type II tumor at the rectosigmoid colon, and histopathological examination revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Enhanced abdominal computed tomography revealed slightly enlarged regional lymph nodes but no ascites around the tumor, and there was no metastasis to the liver or lungs. Therefore, we diagnosed clinical stage T4aN1bM0 rectosigmoid colon cancer. Intraoperatively, a metastatic tumor of the liver surface and a high degree of valve retention in the oral colon were identified. Interventions: After performing laparoscopic HP with AdSpray, we scheduled a laparoscopic RHP with staged hepatic surgery for synchronous liver metastasis from colorectal cancer 1 month later. Outcomes: No postoperative inflammatory adhesions were observed in the pelvis or around the rectal stump, allowing us to perform RHP by a single-incision laparoscopic surgery from the stoma site without any problem. The operation time for RHP was 80 minutes; the patient was in good general condition after the operation, and he was discharged on postoperative day 7. Lessons: In laparoscopic HP, Adspray was easy to use for three-dimensional fields such as the pelvis and effectively prevented postoperative inflammatory adhesions. Thus, RHP may become less risky and be performed more as a minimally invasive surgery.

[1]  J. Shindoh,et al.  Safety of a new spray‐type adhesion barrier (AdSpray®) in liver surgery , 2020, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[2]  J. Shindoh,et al.  A novel scoring system for evaluating the difficulty of lysis of adhesion and surgical risk at repeat hepatectomy , 2020, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[3]  K. Uchiyama,et al.  Clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal resection for advanced colon cancer: propensity score matching analysis , 2019, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  S. Hallam,et al.  Hartmann's procedure, reversal and rate of stoma‐free survival , 2018, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[5]  S. Kira,et al.  Evaluation of a Spray-type, Novel Dextrin Hydrogel Adhesion Barrier Under Laparoscopic Conditions in a Porcine Uterine Horn Adhesion Model. , 2017, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[6]  K. Uchiyama,et al.  What is the Optimal Timing for Liver Surgery of Resectable Synchronous Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer? , 2017, The American surgeon.

[7]  Masaaki Ito,et al.  Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1,014 consecutive patients. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  M. Stommel,et al.  Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[9]  Diarmuid P. O'Donoghue,et al.  Stage II colonic adenocarcinoma: a detailed study of pT4N0 with emphasis on peritoneal involvement and the role of tumour budding , 2012, Histopathology.

[10]  F. Fleming,et al.  Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure following acute diverticulitis: is timing everything? , 2009, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[11]  A. Di Spiezio Sardo,et al.  Prevention of adhesions in gynaecological endoscopy. , 2007, Human reproduction update.

[12]  J. Marchena-Gómez,et al.  Analysis of the factors related to the decision of restoring intestinal continuity after Hartmann’s procedure , 2007, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[13]  V. Fazio,et al.  Hartmann’s Reversal Is Associated With High Postoperative Adverse Events , 2005, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[14]  M. Rosen,et al.  Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure. , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[15]  J. Campeau,et al.  Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation. , 2001, Human reproduction update.

[16]  Ws Tan Reversal of Hartmann ’ s procedure : experience in an Asian , 2012 .