Boundaries Around Group Interaction: A Meta-Analytic Integration of the Effects of Group Size

Abstract We report a meta-analytic integration that summarizes American research by psychologists on the effects of group size on the permeability of group boundaries. Results indicate that the tendency for larger groups to have less permeable boundaries is highly significant but of small magnitude. This impermeability generally increases as a function of the relative size of the larger group and decreases as a function of the interpersonal distance between members of the group. However, the tendency to skirt around the boundary of a larger group was significantly greater when real behavior in real group settings was measured as compared with when paper-and-pencil measures were obtained in imaginary group settings. Moreover, impermeability was greater for real groups when group members stood closer together, whereas it was greater for imaginary groups when they stood farther apart.

[1]  David E. Smith,et al.  Stepping Aside: Correlates of Displacement in Pedestrians. , 1979 .

[2]  D. M. Pedersen Effects of Group Characteristics on Social Space , 1978 .

[3]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective , 1983 .

[4]  E. S. Knowles,et al.  Convergent validity of personal space measures: Consistent results with low intercorrelations , 1980 .

[5]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Basic Meta-Analysis: Procedures and Programs , 1985 .

[6]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Advanced BASIC meta-analysis , 1989 .

[7]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[8]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Perceptions of Ingroup and Outgroup Variability: A Meta-Analytic Integration , 1989 .

[9]  E. S. Knowles,et al.  Group size and the extension of social space boundaries. , 1976 .

[10]  E. S. Knowles,et al.  Boundaries around group interaction: the effect of group size and member status on boundary permeability. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Robert Sommer,et al.  Personal space : the behavioral basis of design , 1970 .

[12]  James M. Dabbs join,et al.  Beauty is Power: The Use of Space on the Sidewalk , 1975 .

[13]  M. Patterson,et al.  Spatial Factors in Social Interactions , 1968 .

[14]  B. Mullen,et al.  Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta‐analytic integrations , 1988 .

[15]  Henry Dreyfuss,et al.  Designing for people , 1955 .

[16]  E. S. Knowles,et al.  Groups and crowds as social entities: Effects of activity, size, and member similarity on nonmembers. , 1976 .

[17]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Salience, motivation and artifact as contributions to the relation between participation rate and leadership , 1989 .

[18]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Self-Attention Theory: The Effects of Group Composition on the Individual , 1987 .

[19]  B. Mullen Strength and immediacy of sources: A meta-analytic evaluation of the forgotten elements of social impact theory. , 1985 .