Acoustic-based proton range verification in heterogeneous tissue: simulation studies

Acoustic-based proton range verification (protoacoustics) is a potential in vivo technique for determining the Bragg peak position. Previous measurements and simulations have been restricted to homogeneous water tanks. Here, a CT-based simulation method is proposed and applied to a liver and prostate case to model the effects of tissue heterogeneity on the protoacoustic amplitude and time-of-flight range verification accuracy. For the liver case, posterior irradiation with a single proton pencil beam was simulated for detectors placed on the skin. In the prostate case, a transrectal probe measured the protoacoustic pressure generated by irradiation with five separate anterior proton beams. After calculating the proton beam dose deposition, each CT voxel's material properties were mapped based on Hounsfield Unit values, and thermoacoustically-generated acoustic wave propagation was simulated with the k-Wave MATLAB toolbox. By comparing the simulation results for the original liver CT to homogenized variants, the effects of heterogeneity were assessed. For the liver case, 1.4 cGy of dose at the Bragg peak generated 50 mPa of pressure (13 cm distal), a 2×  lower amplitude than simulated in a homogeneous water tank. Protoacoustic triangulation of the Bragg peak based on multiple detector measurements resulted in 0.4 mm accuracy for a δ-function proton pulse irradiation of the liver. For the prostate case, higher amplitudes are simulated (92-1004 mPa) for closer detectors (<8 cm). For four of the prostate beams, the protoacoustic range triangulation was accurate to  ⩽1.6 mm (δ-function proton pulse). Based on the results, application of protoacoustic range verification to heterogeneous tissue will result in decreased signal amplitudes relative to homogeneous water tank measurements, but accurate range verification is still expected to be possible.

[1]  Da-Kang Yao,et al.  Photoacoustic measurement of the Grüneisen parameter of tissue , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[2]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  Range assessment in particle therapy based on prompt γ-ray timing measurements , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Mark A. Anastasio,et al.  Photoacoustic tomography through a whole adult human skull with a photon recycler , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[4]  E. Neufeld,et al.  IT’IS Database for Thermal and Electromagnetic Parameters of Biological Tissues , 2012 .

[5]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Ionoacoustic tomography of the proton Bragg peak in combination with ultrasound and optoacoustic imaging , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[6]  E. Demidova,et al.  Measurements of the Parameters of the Acoustic Radiation Accompanying the Moderation of an Intense Proton Beam in Water , 2001 .

[7]  M. Levi,et al.  Experimental Studies of the Acoustic Signature of Proton Beams Traversing Fluid Media , 1979 .

[8]  Guillaume Janssens,et al.  Experimental observation of acoustic emissions generated by a pulsed proton beam from a hospital-based clinical cyclotron. , 2015, Medical physics.

[9]  C. Narasimhan,et al.  A high resolution computer model for sound propagation in the human thorax based on the Visible Human data set , 2004, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[10]  T. D. Mast Empirical relationships between acoustic parameters in human soft tissues , 2000 .

[11]  K Parodi,et al.  Ionoacoustic characterization of the proton Bragg peak with submillimeter accuracy. , 2015, Medical physics.

[12]  E. Pedroni,et al.  The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Bradley E. Treeby,et al.  Erratum: Modeling power law absorption and dispersion for acoustic propagation using the fractional Laplacian [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 2741–2748 (2010)] , 2011 .

[14]  B. Cox,et al.  Modeling power law absorption and dispersion for acoustic propagation using the fractional Laplacian. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  B. T. Cox,et al.  The challenges for quantitative photoacoustic imaging , 2009, BiOS.

[16]  Davide Fontanarosa,et al.  A CT based correction method for speed of sound aberration for ultrasound based image guided radiotherapy. , 2011, Medical physics.

[17]  Bradley E Treeby Acoustic attenuation compensation in photoacoustic tomography using time-variant filtering , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[18]  Antony Lomax,et al.  In vivo proton range verification: a review , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  E Pedroni,et al.  Proton radiography as a tool for quality control in proton therapy. , 1995, Medical physics.

[20]  H. Paganetti Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  R. Fay Hearing by Whales and Dolphins 2 Cetacean Ears , 2010 .

[22]  F. Duck Physical properties of tissue , 1990 .

[23]  B T Cox,et al.  k-Wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[24]  T Inada,et al.  Time resolved properties of acoustic pulses generated in water and in soft tissue by pulsed proton beam irradiation--a possibility of doses distribution monitoring in proton radiation therapy. , 1991, Medical physics.

[25]  S Lees,et al.  Parameters influencing the sonic velocity in compact calcified tissues of various species. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Hirohiko Tsujii,et al.  Acoustic pulse generated in a patient during treatment by pulsed proton radiation beam , 1995 .

[27]  E. Demidova,et al.  Measuring the Ultrasonic Field Generated in Water upon the Deceleration of a Proton Beam , 2004 .

[28]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Automatic CT-ultrasound registration for diagnostic imaging and image-guided intervention , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[29]  G Janssens,et al.  Towards clinical application: prompt gamma imaging of passively scattered proton fields with a knife-edge slit camera , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Joao Seco,et al.  Proton range verification through prompt gamma-ray spectroscopy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  T. Gimpel,et al.  Thermoacoustic range verification using a clinical ultrasound array provides perfectly co-registered overlay of the Bragg peak onto an ultrasound image , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Martin Frenz,et al.  Photoacoustic waves excited in liquids by fiber-transmitted laser pulses , 1998 .

[33]  C. Sehgal,et al.  Proton beam characterization by proton-induced acoustic emission: simulation studies , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Joao Seco,et al.  Feasibility study of in vivo MRI based dosimetric verification of proton end-of-range for liver cancer patients. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[35]  Kevin C Jones,et al.  How proton pulse characteristics influence protoacoustic determination of proton-beam range: simulation studies , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Sam Beddar,et al.  Imaging of prompt gamma rays emitted during delivery of clinical proton beams with a Compton camera: feasibility studies for range verification. , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  Ben Cox,et al.  Sensitivity of simulated transcranial ultrasound fields to acoustic medium property maps , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  J. A. Evans,et al.  Dependence of the velocity and attenuation of ultrasound in bone on the mineral content. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  K. Stantz,et al.  Feasibility of RACT for 3D dose measurement and range verification in a water phantom. , 2015, Medical physics.

[40]  Chandra M Sehgal,et al.  Acoustic time-of-flight for proton range verification in water. , 2016, Medical physics.

[41]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Submillimeter ionoacoustic range determination for protons in water at a clinical synchrocyclotron , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.