The Tuning of Human Motor Response to Risk in a Dynamic Environment Task

The role of motor uncertainty in discrete or static space tasks, such as pointing tasks, has been investigated in many experiments. These studies have shown that humans hold an internal representation of intrinsic and extrinsic motor uncertainty and compensate for this variability when planning movement. The aim of this study was to investigate how humans respond to uncertainties during movement execution in a dynamic environment despite indeterminate knowledge of the outcome of actions. Additionally, the role of errors, or lack thereof, in predicting risk was examined. In the experiment, subjects completed a driving simulation game on a two-lane road. The road contained random curves so that subjects were forced to use sensory feedback to complete the task and could not rely only on motor planning. Risk was manipulated by using horizontal perturbations to create the illusion of driving on a bumpy road, thereby imposing motor uncertainty, and altering the cost function of the road. Results suggest continual responsiveness to cost and uncertainty in a dynamic task and provide evidence that subjects avoid risk even in the absence of errors. The results suggest that humans tune their statistical motor behavior based on cost, taking into account probabilities of possible outcomes in response to environmental uncertainty.

[1]  A. Faisal,et al.  Near Optimal Combination of Sensory and Motor Uncertainty in Time During a Naturalistic Perception-Action Task , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Gerald Farin,et al.  Curves and surfaces for computer aided geometric design , 1990 .

[3]  M. Posner,et al.  Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Terence D. Sanger,et al.  Risk-Aware Control , 2014, Neural Computation.

[5]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Motor control is decision-making , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  The Rise of Cognitive Architectures , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[7]  Elger L. Abrahamse,et al.  Cognitive Processing in New and Practiced Discrete Keying Sequences , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[8]  Hang Zhang,et al.  Planning Routes Across Economic Terrains: Maximizing Utility, Following Heuristics , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[9]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Fitts' law as the outcome of a dynamic noise filtering model of motor control , 1995 .

[10]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Combining Priors and Noisy Visual Cues in a Rapid Pointing Task , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[12]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Risk-Sensitivity in Sensorimotor Control , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Questions Without Words: A Comparison Between Decision Making Under Risk and Movement Planning Under Risk , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[15]  M. Landy,et al.  Dynamic Estimation of Task-Relevant Variance in Movement under Risk , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  M. Landy,et al.  Statistical decision theory and trade-offs in the control of motor response. , 2003, Spatial vision.

[18]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Review TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control , 2022 .

[19]  Winfried Denk,et al.  Neurotechnology: Summa technologiae , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[20]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Statistical decision theory and the selection of rapid, goal-directed movements. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  M. Landy,et al.  Optimal Compensation for Changes in Task-Relevant Movement Variability , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  L. Maloney,et al.  Decision-theoretic models of visual perception and action , 2010, Vision Research.