Source effects in the micro-mobilization of collective action via social media

Research has shown that micro-mobilization efforts that invoke social media rely heavily on the influence of personal networks to motivate collective action participation. This study examines whether this trend applies (a) to networks of different levels of personalness, (b) to causes and organizations which people are either unaware of or not affiliated with, and (c) how personal networks affect people's willingness to participate in online versus offline forms of collective action, when personal dispositional factors (activism- and issue involvement, perceived self-, technological-, and group efficacies) are considered. An experiment (N = 315) tested whether calls-to-action by different sources via social media (close personal networks v. distant social networks v. organization officials) influence individuals’ willingness to publicly express support online through social media-based collective activities (e.g. commenting, hyperlinking, ‘Liking’, etc.) and offline activities (e.g. demonstrations, donning campaign materials, etc.). Findings are leveraged to provide practical insight and to inform theoretical development in these domains.

[1]  Doug McAdam,et al.  Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action , 2003 .

[2]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[3]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2002 .

[4]  Christian Schwarzenegger,et al.  A MOVEMENT OF CONNECTED INDIVIDUALS , 2012 .

[5]  John D. McCarthy,et al.  Resource Mobilization by Local Social Movement Organizations: Agency, Strategy, and Organization in the Movement Against Drinking and Driving , 1996 .

[6]  Summer Harlow,et al.  Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline , 2012, New Media Soc..

[7]  Stefaan Walgrave,et al.  New media, new movements? The role of the internet in shaping the ‘anti‐globalization’ movement , 2002 .

[8]  Colin Lankshear,et al.  Online memes, affinities, and cultural production , 2007 .

[9]  Howard Rheingold.  Smart mobs : Les communautés intelligentes mobiles comment reconnaître le futur quand il vous tombe dessus ? , 2003 .

[10]  PRIVATE PROTEST? , 2012 .

[11]  Stuart Lowe.  The City and the Grassroots , 1986 .

[12]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Collective Action in the Age of the Internet , 2002 .

[13]  Marc Hooghe,et al.  The Potential of Internet Mobilization: An Experimental Study on the Effect of Internet and Face-to-Face Mobilization Efforts , 2010 .

[14]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Summer Harlow,et al.  COLLECTIVE ACTION ON THE WEB , 2012 .

[16]  Rosemary Thackeray,et al.  Empowering Youth: Use of Technology in Advocacy to Affect Social Change , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Carroll J. Glynn,et al.  REFERENCE GROUPS, OPINION INTENSITY, AND PUBLIC OPINION EXPRESSION , 1997 .

[18]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Collective Action in Organizations: Contents , 2012 .

[19]  H. Oshagan.  REFERENCE GROUP INFLUENCE ON OPINION EXPRESSION , 1996 .

[20]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Expressive Responses to News Stories about Extremist Groups: a Framing Experiment , 2022 .

[21]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online , 2010 .

[22]  M. Lim.  Clicks, Cabs, and Coffee Houses: Social Media and Oppositional Movements in Egypt, 2004–2011 , 2012 .

[23]  Patrick Wilson,et al.  The Cognitive and the Social@@@The Social Construction of Science: A Comparative Study of Goal Direction Research Evolution, and Legitimation.@@@Second-Hand Knowledge: An Inquiry into Cognitive Authority. , 1983 .

[24]  Tatiana Tatarchevskiy,et al.  The ‘popular’ culture of internet activism , 2011, New Media Soc..

[25]  P. Ekins.  A New World Order : Grassroots Movements for Global Change , 1992 .

[26]  Young Mie Kim,et al.  Issue Publics in the New Information Environment , 2009, Commun. Res..

[27]  Zeynep Tufekci,et al.  Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square , 2012 .

[28]  J. V. Laer,et al.  INTERNET AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT ACTION REPERTOIRES: Opportunities and limitations , 2010 .

[29]  Jacquelien van Stekelenburg,et al.  The social psychology of protest , 1997 .

[30]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Collective Action in Organizations: Interaction and Engagement in an Era of Technological Change , 2012 .

[31]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. , 1998 .

[32]  Dana R. Fisher,et al.  MOBILIZING FRIENDS AND STRANGERS , 2010 .

[33]  Kazys Varnelis.  Networked Publics , 2012 .

[34]  Nan Lin,et al.  Social capital and civic action: A network-based approach , 2008 .

[35]  W. Bennett,et al.  THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION , 2012 .

[36]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Movement Participation in the Digital Age , 2002 .

[37]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Reconceptualizing Collective Action in the Contemporary Media Environment , 2005 .

[38]  C. Nass,et al.  Conceptualizing Sources in Online News , 2001 .

[39]  Peter Van Aelst,et al.  INTERNET AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT ACTION REPERTOIRES , 2010 .

[40]  Malcolm R. Parks.  Personal Relationships and Personal Networks , 2007 .

[41]  K. Stamm,et al.  Group Affiliations, Opinion Polarization, and Global Organizations: Views of the World Trade Organization Before and After Seattle , 2002 .

[42]  Bert Klandermans,et al.  The Social Psychology of Protest , 1998 .

[43]  Francesca Polletta,et al.  Dynamics of Contention , 2002 .

[44]  Doug McAdam.  Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  Graham Meikle,et al.  Future Active: Media Activism and the Internet , 2002 .

[46]  Dirk Oegema,et al.  POTENTIALS, NETWORKS, MOTIVATIONS, AND BARRIERS: STEPS TOWARDS PARTICIPATION IN SOCIAL MOVEMENTS * , 1987 .

[47]  M. Castells.  The City and Grassroots , 1983 .

[48]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[49]  Dan Mercea,et al.  Digital prefigurative participation: The entwinement of online communication and offline participation in protest events , 2012, New Media Soc..

[50]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[51]  J. Juris.  Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation , 2012 .

[52]  M. Diani.  SOCIAL MOVEMENT NETWORKS VIRTUAL AND REAL , 2000 .

[53]  B. Loader,et al.  Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movements , 2004 .

[54]  Christian Breunig,et al.  Communication and Political Mobilization: Digital Media and the Organization of Anti-Iraq War Demonstrations in the U.S. , 2008 .

[55]  Maria Bakardjieva,et al.  Reconfiguring the mediapolis: New media and civic agency , 2012, New Media Soc..

[56]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Online networks of student protest: the case of the living wage campaign , 2008, New Media Soc..

[57]  Mario Diani,et al.  Social Movements and Networks , 2003 .

[58]  Nakwon Jung,et al.  The Mediating Role of Knowledge and Efficacy in the Effects of Communication on Political Participation , 2011 .

[59]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement , 2011, Commun. Res..

[60]  Michael E. Morrell.  Survey and Experimental Evidence for a Reliable and Valid Measure of Internal Political Efficacy , 2003 .

[61]  R. Levine,et al.  Political efficacy: Enhancing the construct and its relationship to mobilization of people , 1994 .

[62]  Ann Herda-Rapp.  The Power of Informal Leadership: Women Leaders in the Civil Rights Movement , 1998 .

[63]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies , 1995 .

[64]  Russell Spears,et al.  Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  Victoria Carty.  NEW INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AND GRASSROOTS MOBILIZATION , 2010 .

[66]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .