Purpose
This paper aims to provide an evaluation of the findings first put forward in the article “A cross-sectional test of the effect and conceptualization of service value” with the benefit of hindsight, and to offer directions for further research and developments in the research area.
Design/methodology/approach
Research directions which emanated from the publication of the paper have been examined in the light of current service(s) marketing theory and practice. As a result, promising current and future strands of research have been identified.
Findings
The focus of both the original and this paper is on the conceptualization and measurement of the value construct. Although much theory has been advanced relative to the measurement of value, the marketing literature lacks a conceptualization and measures that reflect this theory.
Research limitations/implications
The implication of the paper is that marketing scholars tend to focus more on to other studies before exhausting the opportunities to identify and test appropriate conceptualizations and measures of core marketing constructs such as value, quality, sacrifice and satisfaction.
Practical implications
Although value is universally identified as a major driver of consumer decision-making, a full appreciation of its role in the strategic marketing efforts of organizations depends on having an accurate conceptualization and measures. The original paper and this revisit motivate and assist organizations in their efforts to better understand value and its impact in the decisions made by consumers.
Social implications
To contribute to the needs and wants of society, organizations must identify what is valued by society. The original and this revisit identify the creation of value as a basic need in encouraging consumer behaviours when the intent is to satisfy societal needs or desires.
Originality/value
The original paper was highly rated, and generated discussion and important further research. It has value as part of the history of service marketing research. The retrospective analysis by the authors gives a unique insight into processes and thinking associated with understanding key aspects that contribute to the historical development of service marketing, and provides substantial food for thought for future research directions.
[1]
Stephen L. Vargo,et al.
Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution
,
2008
.
[2]
A. Parasuraman,et al.
The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality
,
1996
.
[3]
J. J. Cronin,et al.
Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments
,
2000
.
[4]
Donald J. Shemwell,et al.
A cross-sectional test of the effect and conceptualization of service value
,
1997
.
[5]
Stephen L. Vargo,et al.
Service-dominant logic: reactions, reflections and refinements
,
2006
.
[6]
V. Zeithaml.
Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence:
,
1988
.
[7]
Steven A. Taylor,et al.
Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension
,
1992
.
[8]
Richard J. Varey,et al.
The service-dominant logic and the future of marketing
,
2008
.
[9]
Stephen L. Vargo,et al.
From goods to service(s): Divergences and convergences of logics
,
2008
.
[10]
Christian Grönroos,et al.
Relationality in the service logic of value creation
,
2015
.
[11]
J. J. Cronin,et al.
Removing the contextual lens: A multinational, multi-setting comparison of service evaluation models
,
2005
.
[12]
Stephen L. Vargo,et al.
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
,
2004
.
[13]
Steven A. Taylor,et al.
Servperf versus Servqual: Reconciling Performance-Based and Perceptions-Minus-Expectations Measurement of Service Quality
,
1994
.