Matching theory for cognitive spectrum allocation in wireless networks

In this paper, a novel spectrum allocation approach for cognitive radio networks (CRNs) is proposed. Based on a measure of inference performance as well as on a measure of quality-of-service, the association between secondary users (SUs) in the network and frequency bands licensed to primary users (PUs) is investigated. The problem is formulated as a matching game between SUs and PUs. In this game, SUs employ hypothesis testing to detect PUs' signals and, eventually, rank them based on the logarithm of the a posteriori probability ratio. A valuation that captures the ranking metric and rate over the PU-owned frequency bands is proposed to PUs in the form of credit or rewards by SUs. Using this proposal, a PU evaluates a utility function that it uses to build its association preferences. A distributed algorithm that allows both SUs and PUs to interact and self-organize into a stable and optimal matching is presented. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm can improve: i) the sum of SUs' rates by up to 20% and 60% relative to the deferred acceptance algorithm and random channel allocation approach respectively, and ii) the sum of PUs' payoffs by up to 25% compared to the deferred acceptance algorithm. The results also show an improved convergence time.

[1]  Haitao Zheng,et al.  Distributed spectrum allocation via local bargaining , 2005, 2005 Second Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2005. IEEE SECON 2005..

[2]  Eduard A. Jorswieck,et al.  Stable matchings for resource allocation in wireless networks , 2011, 2011 17th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP).

[3]  Thomas Wirth,et al.  Distributed Channel Assignment in Cognitive Radio Networks: Stable Matching and Walrasian Equilibrium , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  L. S. Shapley,et al.  College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 2013, Am. Math. Mon..

[5]  Amir Leshem,et al.  Multichannel Opportunistic Carrier Sensing for Stable Channel Access Control in Cognitive Radio Systems , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Wireless communications , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[7]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis , 1990 .

[8]  Ekram Hossain,et al.  Dynamic Spectrum Access and Management in Cognitive Radio Networks: Introduction , 2009 .

[9]  Ekram Hossain,et al.  Dynamic Spectrum Access and Management in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2009 .

[10]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[11]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  The Effect of Fading, Channel Inversion, and Threshold Scheduling on Ad Hoc Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  A survey on spectrum management in cognitive radio networks , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  Jing Xu,et al.  A survey on dynamic spectrum access protocols for distributed cognitive wireless networks , 2012, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking.

[14]  P.K. Varshney,et al.  Target Location Estimation in Sensor Networks With Quantized Data , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[15]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  CRAHNs: Cognitive radio ad hoc networks , 2009, Ad Hoc Networks.

[16]  Mihaela van der Schaar,et al.  Distributed Resource Management in Multihop Cognitive Radio Networks for Delay-Sensitive Transmission , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[17]  Jeffrey Boksiner,et al.  Centrally Controlled Dynamic Spectrum Access for MANETs , 2013, MILCOM 2013 - 2013 IEEE Military Communications Conference.