Mapping tall shrub biomass in Alaska at landscape scale using structure-from-motion photogrammetry and lidar

Abstract Warming in arctic and boreal regions is increasing shrub cover and biomass. In southcentral Alaska, willow (Salix spp.) and alder (Alnus spp.) shrubs grow taller than many tree species and account for a substantial proportion of aboveground biomass, yet they are not individually measured as part of the operational Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Program. The goal of this research was to test methods for landscape-scale mapping of tall shrub biomass in upper montane and subalpine environments using FIA-type plot measurements (n = 51) and predictor variables from imagery-based structure-from-motion (SfM) and airborne lidar. Specifically, we compared biomass models constructed from imagery acquired by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV; ~1.7 cm pixels), imagery from the NASA Goddard's Lidar, Hyperspectral, and Thermal Airborne Imager (G-LiHT; ~3.1 cm pixels), and concomitant G-LiHT small-footprint lidar. Tall shrub biomass was most accurately predicted at 5 m resolution (R2 = 0.81, RMSE = 1.09 kg m−2) using G-LiHT SfM color and structure variables. Lidar-only models had lower precision (R2 = 0.74, RMSE = 1.26 kg m−2), possibly due to reduced model information content from variable multicollinearity or lower data density. Separate models for upper montane zones with trees and shrubs and subalpine zones with only shrubs were always chosen over single models based on minimization of Akaike's Information Criterion, indicating the need for variable sets robust to overhanging tree canopy. Decreasing point density from UAV (5000–8000 pts. m−2) to the G-LiHT SfM point cloud (500–2000 pts. m−2) had little impact on model fit, suggesting that high-resolution airborne imagery can extend SfM approaches well beyond line-of-sight restrictions for UAV platforms. Overall, our results confirmed that SfM from high-resolution imagery is a viable approach to estimate shrub biomass in the boreal region, especially when an existing lidar terrain model and local field calibration data are available to quantify uncertainty in the SfM point cloud and landscape-scale estimates of shrub biomass.

[1]  Leslie A. Viereck,et al.  The Alaska vegetation classification. , 1992 .

[2]  D. Morton,et al.  Quantifying Boreal Forest Structure and Composition Using UAV Structure from Motion , 2018 .

[3]  I. Howat,et al.  ArcticDEM; A Publically Available, High Resolution Elevation Model of the Arctic , 2016 .

[4]  H. Andersen,et al.  Tree species differentiation using intensity data derived from leaf-on and leaf-off airborne laser scanner data , 2009 .

[5]  Aihua Li,et al.  Lidar Aboveground Vegetation Biomass Estimates in Shrublands: Prediction, Uncertainties and Application to Coarser Scales , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[6]  W. Cohen,et al.  The U.S. forest carbon accounting framework: stocks and stock change, 1990-2016 , 2015 .

[7]  S. Goetz,et al.  Advances in remote sensing technology and implications for measuring and monitoring forest carbon stocks and change , 2011 .

[8]  F. Chapin,et al.  Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization , 2004, Nature.

[9]  M. Loso,et al.  Thermal segregation drives patterns of alder and willow expansion in a montane ecosystem subject to climate warming , 2017 .

[10]  J. Masek,et al.  The vegetation greenness trend in Canada and US Alaska from 1984–2012 Landsat data , 2016 .

[11]  Philip Marsh,et al.  Recent Shrub Proliferation in the Mackenzie Delta Uplands and Microclimatic Implications , 2012, Ecosystems.

[12]  Adrien Michez,et al.  Discrimination of Deciduous Tree Species from Time Series of Unmanned Aerial System Imagery , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  Lawrence A. Corp,et al.  NASA Goddard's LiDAR, Hyperspectral and Thermal (G-LiHT) Airborne Imager , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[14]  R. Dial,et al.  Changes in the alpine forest-tundra ecotone commensurate with recent warming in southcentral Alaska: Evidence from orthophotos and field plots , 2007 .

[15]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  High spatial resolution three-dimensional mapping of vegetation spectral dynamics using computer vision , 2013 .

[16]  Petteri Packalen,et al.  Assessing the performance of aerial image point cloud and spectral metrics in predicting boreal forest canopy cover , 2017 .

[17]  R. Fraser,et al.  Warming-Induced Shrub Expansion and Lichen Decline in the Western Canadian Arctic , 2014, Ecosystems.

[18]  B. Cook,et al.  Boreal canopy surfaces from spaceborne stereogrammetry , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[19]  Steven F. Oberbauer,et al.  Plot-scale evidence of tundra vegetation change and links to recent summer warming. , 2012 .

[20]  S. Robson,et al.  3‐D uncertainty‐based topographic change detection with structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry: precision maps for ground control and directly georeferenced surveys , 2017 .

[21]  J. Estornell,et al.  Estimation of biomass and volume of shrub vegetation using LiDAR and spectral data in a Mediterranean environment , 2012 .

[22]  C. Schaaf,et al.  Changes in tall shrub abundance on the North Slope of Alaska, 2000–2010 , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[23]  R. McRoberts.  A model-based approach to estimating forest area , 2006 .

[24]  J. Bryan Blair,et al.  Mapping biomass and stress in the Sierra Nevada using lidar and hyperspectral data fusion , 2011 .

[25]  H. Piégay,et al.  Classification of riparian forest species and health condition using multi-temporal and hyperspatial imagery from unmanned aerial system , 2016, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[26]  Sarah E. Gergel,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity in the Shrub Tundra Ecotone in the Mackenzie Delta Region, Northwest Territories: Implications for Arctic Environmental Change , 2010, Ecosystems.

[27]  J. Welker,et al.  Declining growth of deciduous shrubs in the warming climate of continental western Greenland , 2018 .

[28]  Dar A. Roberts,et al.  Mapping urban forest leaf area index with airborne lidar using penetration metrics and allometry , 2015 .

[29]  L. Wallace,et al.  Direct Georeferencing of Ultrahigh-Resolution , 2013 .

[30]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Comparing ALS and Image-Based Point Cloud Metrics and Modelled Forest Inventory Attributes in a Complex Coastal Forest Environment , 2015 .

[31]  J. Dietrich.  Riverscape mapping with helicopter-based Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry , 2016 .

[32]  Philippe Lejeune,et al.  Comparison of UAS photogrammetric products for tree detection and characterization of coniferous stands , 2017 .

[33]  Gottfried Mandlburger,et al.  Beyond 3-D: The New Spectrum of Lidar Applications for Earth and Ecological Sciences , 2016 .

[34]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Testing LiDAR models of fractional cover across multiple forest ecozones , 2009 .

[35]  S. Goetz,et al.  Tundra vegetation effects on pan-Arctic albedo , 2011 .

[36]  Jennie R. McLaren,et al.  Changes in the understory plant community and ecosystem properties along a shrub density gradient , 2018, Arctic Science.

[37]  M. Nolan,et al.  Mapping snow depth from manned aircraft on landscape scales at centimeter resolution using structure-from-motion photogrammetry , 2015 .

[38]  C. Tucker.  Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation , 1979 .

[39]  D. Roberts,et al.  Urban tree species mapping using hyperspectral and lidar data fusion , 2014 .

[40]  Martina L. Hobi,et al.  Countrywide Stereo-Image Matching for Updating Digital Surface Models in the Framework of the Swiss National Forest Inventory , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[41]  Marc Olano,et al.  Optimal Altitude, Overlap, and Weather Conditions for Computer Vision UAV Estimates of Forest Structure , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[42]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Inventory of Small Forest Areas Using an Unmanned Aerial System , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[43]  D. Morton,et al.  Patterns of canopy and surface layer consumption in a boreal forest fire from repeat airborne lidar , 2017 .

[44]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Comparison of airborne laser scanning and digital stereo imagery for characterizing forest canopy gaps in coastal temperate rainforests , 2018 .

[45]  P. Sullivan,et al.  Shrubline but not treeline advance matches climate velocity in montane ecosystems of south‐central Alaska , 2016, Global change biology.

[46]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Direct Georeferencing of Ultrahigh-Resolution UAV Imagery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[47]  T. Wurtz.  Understory alder in three boreal forests of Alaska: local distribution and effects on soil fertility , 1995 .

[48]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Photogrammetry for Forest Inventory: Planning Guidelines , 2017 .

[49]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Classifying California plant species temporally using airborne hyperspectral imagery , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[50]  Michael J. Olsen,et al.  Prediction of understory vegetation cover with airborne lidar in an interior ponderosa pine forest , 2012 .

[51]  S. Popescu,et al.  Satellite lidar vs. small footprint airborne lidar: Comparing the accuracy of aboveground biomass estimates and forest structure metrics at footprint level , 2011 .

[52]  Karen Anderson,et al.  Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .

[53]  Paul Ryan Nesbit,et al.  Enhancing UAV-SfM 3D Model Accuracy in High-Relief Landscapes by Incorporating Oblique Images , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[54]  Srikanth Saripalli,et al.  Rapid mapping of ultrafine fault zone topography with structure from motion , 2014 .

[55]  Jason A. Clark,et al.  Range Expansion of Moose in Arctic Alaska Linked to Warming and Increased Shrub Habitat , 2016, PloS one.

[56]  M. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  A Photogrammetric Workflow for the Creation of a Forest Canopy Height Model from Small Unmanned Aerial System Imagery , 2013 .

[57]  Marc Olano,et al.  What is the Point? Evaluating the Structure, Color, and Semantic Traits of Computer Vision Point Clouds of Vegetation , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[58]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  A pseudo-waveform technique to assess forest structure using discrete lidar data , 2011 .

[59]  S. Robson,et al.  Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground‐based image networks , 2014 .

[60]  J. Eitel,et al.  Estimating aboveground biomass and leaf area of low-stature Arctic shrubs with terrestrial LiDAR , 2015 .

[61]  M. Sturm,et al.  The evidence for shrub expansion in Northern Alaska and the Pan‐Arctic , 2006 .

[62]  Anne D. Bjorkman,et al.  Eighteen years of ecological monitoring reveals multiple lines of evidence for tundra vegetation change , 2019, Ecological Monographs.

[63]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Comparing the accuracies of forest attributes predicted from airborne laser scanning and digital aerial photogrammetry in operational forest inventories , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[64]  S. K. Das.  Assessing the Performance , 2020 .

[65]  Liviu Theodor Ene,et al.  Use of partial-coverage UAV data in sampling for large scale forest inventories , 2017 .

[66]  S. Goetz,et al.  Shrub expansion in tundra ecosystems: dynamics, impacts and research priorities , 2011, Environmental Research Letters.

[67]  S. Goetz,et al.  Tundra vegetation effects on pan-Arctic albedo Tundra vegetation effects on pan-Arctic albedo , 2011 .

[68]  The estimation of biomass. , 1992 .

[69]  Andrew M. Cunliffe,et al.  Ultra-fine grain landscape-scale quantification of dryland vegetation structure with drone-acquired structure-from-motion photogrammetry , 2016 .

[70]  J. Eitel,et al.  High-resolution mapping of aboveground shrub biomass in Arctic tundra using airborne lidar and imagery , 2016 .

[71]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Using airborne lidar to predict Leaf Area Index in cottonwood trees and refine riparian water-use estimates , 2006 .

[72]  Jon Holmgren,et al.  Snow-Shrub Interactions in Arctic Tundra: A Hypothesis with Climatic Implications , 2001 .

[73]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  An improved simple morphological filter for the terrain classification of airborne LIDAR data , 2013 .

[74]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Digital Aerial Photogrammetry for Updating Area-Based Forest Inventories: A Review of Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions , 2019, Current Forestry Reports.

[75]  A. Hudak,et al.  Mapping snags and understory shrubs for a LiDAR-based assessment of wildlife habitat suitability , 2009 .

[76]  Scott J Goetz,et al.  Spatiotemporal remote sensing of ecosystem change and causation across Alaska , 2018, Global change biology.

[77]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Quantifying the contribution of spectral metrics derived from digital aerial photogrammetry to area-based models of forest inventory attributes , 2019 .

[78]  William A. Bechtold,et al.  The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program - national sampling design and estimation procedures , 2005 .

[79]  Johannes Breidenbach,et al.  A comparison of UAV laser scanning, photogrammetry and airborne laser scanning for precision inventory of small-forest properties , 2020 .

[80]  D. Morton,et al.  Satellite‐based evidence for shrub and graminoid tundra expansion in northern Quebec from 1986 to 2010 , 2012 .

[81]  R. Fraser,et al.  UAV photogrammetry for mapping vegetation in the low-Arctic , 2016 .