Museum Assessment and FDH Technology: Towards a Global Approach

This paper presents a global approach for museum assessment. We conceptualise a museum as an entity which needs to be evaluated according to three well defined tasks: preservation, research and communication, and outcomes. We propose a methodology based on the determination of efficiency frontiers. This method uses a deterministic non parametric and non convex technology (Free Disposal Hull). We analyse technical efficiency, but also scale efficiency with a new restrictive scale approach. We present an ordering of museums into classes representing a level of performance with respect to the three required tasks. We illustrate our analysis using a three year database of museums from the French speaking region of Belgium.

[1]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[2]  A R Forrest,et al.  Quality control. , 1978, British medical journal.

[3]  V. Zolberg Conflicting visions in American art museums , 1981 .

[4]  R. Färe,et al.  The Structure of Technical Efficiency , 1983 .

[5]  D. Deprins,et al.  On Farrell Measures of Technical Efficiency , 1983, Recherches économiques de Louvain.

[6]  George Ellis Burcaw,et al.  Introduction to Museum Work , 1984 .

[7]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the U.S. air forces , 1984, Ann. Oper. Res..

[8]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[9]  Managing in the museum organization: I. leadership and communication , 1987 .

[10]  Ray Jackson,et al.  A museum cost function , 1988 .

[11]  D. Griffin Managing in the museum organization: II. Conflict, tasks, responsibilities , 1988 .

[12]  A. Bessent,et al.  Efficiency Frontier Determination by Constrained Facet Analysis , 1988, Oper. Res..

[13]  P. J. Ames Breaking new ground: Measuring museums’ merits , 1990 .

[14]  N. Petersen Data Envelopment Analysis on a Relaxed Set of Assumptions , 1990 .

[15]  S. Weil Rethinking the Museum and Other Meditations , 1990 .

[16]  Barry Lord,et al.  The manual of museum planning , 1991 .

[17]  Peter Johnson,et al.  TOURISM, MUSEUMS AND THE LOCAL ECONOMY , 1992 .

[18]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit , 1993 .

[19]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  Cost efficiency in Belgian municipalities , 1993 .

[20]  Philippe Vanden Eeckaut,et al.  Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects☆ , 1995 .

[21]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  DEA on relaxed convexity assumptions , 1996 .

[22]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Equivalence and Implementation of Alternative Methods for Determining Returns to Scale in Data Envel , 1996 .

[23]  R. Janes Museums and the Paradox of Change: A Case Study in Urgent Adaptation , 1997 .

[24]  V. Ginsburgh,et al.  Defining a museum: suggestions for an alternative approach , 1997 .

[25]  Gail Dexter Lord,et al.  The Manual of Museum Management , 1997 .

[26]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Distinguishing technical and scale efficiency on non-convex and convex technologies: theoretical analysis and empirical illustrations , 1998 .

[27]  Gary Edson,et al.  Introduction to Museology - The European Approach , 1998 .

[28]  Selected papers from the Fourth European Workshop on Efficiency and Productivity Analysis held at the Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), Universite Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, October 1995. Guest editor's introduction , 1998 .

[29]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Estimating returns to scale using non-parametric deterministic technologies: A new method based on goodness-of-fit , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Gautam Appa,et al.  On setting scale efficient targets in DEA , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..