Leaf pH as a plant trait: species‐driven rather than soil‐driven variation

Summary 1. Interspecific variation in plant functional traits is fast becoming popular as a tool for understanding and predicting ecosystem biogeochemistry as dependent on vegetation composition. Leaf pH has recently been shown to be a promising new candidate trait for this purpose. But how robust is leaf pH as a species trait in the face of environmental variation? We hypothesized that inherent interspecific variation in leaf pH should be greater than phenotypic variation of given species in response to soil environments. 2. We tested this hypothesis in a temperate herbaceous flora by growing 23 species experimentally in three soils of contrasting pH (ranging by almost three pH units) and related chemistry. 3. As predicted, there was large and consistent variation in leaf pH among these species, which was robust to the differences between soil types. Indeed both the species rankings and the absolute species values for leaf pH were remarkably constant in comparisons between soil types. 4. The fact that a given species can maintain a leaf pH very different from that of their soil environment, combined with the great interspecific variation in leaf pH, indicates that leaf pH really is largely a species-specific trait. Linked with recent field evidence we suggest that interspecific variation in leaf pH, while easy and cheap to assess, has important predictive power of biogeochemical properties and processes in ecosystems.

[1]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Similar cation exchange capacities among bryophyte species refute a presumed mechanism of peatland acidification. , 2010, Ecology.

[2]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Evidence of the ‘plant economics spectrum’ in a subarctic flora , 2010 .

[3]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  An experimental comparison of chemical traits and litter decomposition rates in a diverse range of subarctic bryophyte, lichen and vascular plant species , 2009 .

[4]  Ken Thompson,et al.  Plant physiological ecology, 2nd edn. , 2009 .

[5]  Martin Hermy,et al.  The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life‐history traits of the Northwest European flora , 2008 .

[6]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[7]  D. Wardle,et al.  Aboveground and belowground effects of single-tree removals in New Zealand rain forest. , 2008, Ecology.

[8]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties , 2006 .

[10]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Foliar pH as a new plant trait: can it explain variation in foliar chemistry and carbon cycling processes among subarctic plant species and types? , 2006, Oecologia.

[11]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  Effects of afforestation on water yield: a global synthesis with implications for policy , 2005 .

[12]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[13]  D. Read,et al.  Mycorrhizas in ecosystems , 1991, Experientia.

[14]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents , 2004 .

[15]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[16]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Functional Matrix: A Conceptual Framework for Predicting Multiple Plant Effects on Ecosystem Processes , 2003 .

[17]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[18]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[19]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[20]  P. Reich,et al.  Functional traits, productivity and effects on nitrogen cycling of 33 grassland species , 2002 .

[21]  P. Vitousek,et al.  The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  M. Roderick,et al.  Challenging Theophrastus: A common core list of plant traits for functional ecology , 1999 .

[23]  Hans Lambers,et al.  Plant Physiological Ecology , 2000, Springer New York.

[24]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  CANOPY TREE–SOIL INTERACTIONS WITHIN TEMPERATE FORESTS: SPECIES EFFECTS ON pH AND CATIONS , 1998 .

[25]  D. Wardle,et al.  The Influence of Island Area on Ecosystem Properties , 1997 .

[26]  S. R. Band,et al.  A comparative study of leaf nutrient concentrations in a regional herbaceous flora. , 1997, The New phytologist.

[27]  F. Chapin,et al.  Biotic Control over the Functioning of Ecosystems , 1997 .

[28]  R. Hunt,et al.  Physiology, Allocation, and Growth Rate: A Reexamination of the Tilman Model , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[29]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Functional leaf attributes predict litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants. , 1997, The New phytologist.

[30]  S. Hobbie Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems , 1992 .

[32]  S. Shuster Predation and sexual dimorphism in a marine isopod crustacean , 1990 .

[33]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species , 1989 .

[34]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Biological Invasion by Myrica faya Alters Ecosystem Development in Hawaii , 1987, Science.

[35]  R. Hunt,et al.  Local climate, topography and plant growth in Lathkill Dale NNR. II. Growth and nutrient uptake within a single season , 1986 .

[36]  D. Robinson,et al.  Calcium as an environmental variable , 1984 .

[37]  H. E. Green,et al.  The Ecology of Chalk Heath: Its Relevance to the Calcicole--Calcifuge and Soil Acidification Problems , 1969 .

[38]  P. Zinke,et al.  The Pattern of Influence of Individual Forest Trees on Soil Properties , 1962 .