Statistical considerations in the use and analysis of single-subject designs.

Single-subject designs measure one individual's responses to some experimental manipulation. Statistical methods exist for validly estimating the effect of an intervention on a specific individual by using data from a single-subject design. However, without strong assumptions regarding how an intervention on one individual relates to its effects on others, the results from a single-subject design provide little useful information on the general utility of the intervention. Examination of a single subject cannot verify these assumptions. Correct analysis of data from such designs allows for the possibility of correlation among the observations and the modeling of any changes over time not related to an intervention effect. When data from single-subject designs are collected, the role of assumptions in both the analysis and the generality of conclusions must be frankly acknowledged. Research often develops in stages and the single-subject design can be useful in early stages for hypothesis generation.

[1]  A. Kirby,et al.  Sample size estimation using repeated measurements on biomarkers as outcomes. , 1994, Controlled clinical trials.

[2]  K. Ottenbacher,et al.  The statistical analysis of single-subject data: a comparative examination. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[3]  J. Rochon A statistical model for the "N-of-1" study. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  S. Spechler,et al.  Development for and results of the use of a gastroesophageal reflux disease activity index as an outcome variable in a clinical trial. VA Cooperative Study Group on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). , 1994, Controlled clinical trials.

[5]  H. Petersen,et al.  Statistical aspects of controlled single subject trials. , 1990, Family practice.

[6]  D. Reboussin,et al.  Neuropeptide Y is a neuromodulator of pulsatile luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone release in the gonadectomized rhesus monkey. , 1992, Endocrinology.

[7]  Moricizine and quality of life in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial II (CAST II). , 1994, Controlled clinical trials.

[8]  D. Bates,et al.  Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. , 1990, Biometrics.

[9]  S C Hayes,et al.  Single case experimental design and empirical clinical practice. , 1981, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[10]  B T Bates,et al.  The effect of trial size on statistical power. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  A. Kazdin,et al.  Methodological and interpretive problems of single-case experimental designs. , 1978, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[12]  J. Phillips Serially correlated errors in some single-subject designs , 1983 .

[13]  G H Guyatt,et al.  The n-of-1 randomized controlled trial: clinical usefulness. Our three-year experience. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.