Realizing embodied interaction for visual analytics through large displays

Visual analysts are engaged with the arduous task of scrutinizing increasingly larger data sets. Where conventional desktop displays are reaching their limits in terms of performance efficiency with large data sets, analysts can turn to larger displays. In a world of extensive multi-scale data sets, large high-resolution displays have the potential to show both more overview and detail for a given data set than their smaller counterparts. In addition, people are able to use their embodied resources, such as spatial memory, proprioception, and optical flow to help them maintain orientation and improve performance times on analytic tasks when using larger displays. This paper looks at how physical navigation, physically interacting with large scale visualizations (e.g. walking, crouching, moving the head), affects user performance times on analytic tasks, such as finding patterns in geospatial data. The paper extends the space-scale diagram to take into account physical navigation and explains the theoretical repercussions. The paper then explains an empirical study performed for the purpose of further understanding how physical and virtual navigation affect performance times of tasks on varying size displays. In general, we found that large displays can decrease performance time of basic visualization tasks by more than ten times. In addition, we found overwhelming evidence from the empirical study that participants preferred physical navigation over virtual navigation (e.g. mouse interaction). Specifically, we found that for a number of tasks 100% of the participants chose to physically navigate-physically moving to different areas on the display instead of using virtual navigation to manipulate the view on the display.

[1]  Norman G. Vinson,et al.  Design guidelines for landmarks to support navigation in virtual environments , 1999, CHI '99.

[2]  David H. Douglas,et al.  ALGORITHMS FOR THE REDUCTION OF THE NUMBER OF POINTS REQUIRED TO REPRESENT A DIGITIZED LINE OR ITS CARICATURE , 1973 .

[3]  Greg Welch,et al.  Working in the Office of "Real Soon Now" , 2000, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[4]  Xiaolong Zhang Space-scale animation: enhancing cross-scale understanding of multiscale structures in multiple views , 2005, Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization (CMV'05).

[5]  Chris North,et al.  Evaluation of viewport size and curvature of large, high-resolution displays , 2006, Graphics Interface.

[6]  Umer Farooq,et al.  Empirical Comparison of Human Behavior and Performance with Different Display Devices for Virtual Environments , 2002 .

[7]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  The Infocockpit: providing location and place to aid human memory , 2001, PUI '01.

[8]  S. H. Sato,et al.  Interaction design for large displays , 1997, INTR.

[9]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Data mountain: using spatial memory for document management , 1998, UIST '98.

[10]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Toward Characterizing the Productivity Benefits of Very Large Displays , 2003, INTERACT.

[11]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Space-scale diagrams: understanding multiscale interfaces , 1995, CHI '95.

[12]  Chris North,et al.  An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[13]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Distortions in cognitive maps , 1992 .

[14]  Rudy Darken,et al.  Navigating large virtual spaces , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Navigating Buildings in "Desk-Top" Virtual Environments: Experimental Investigations Using Extended Navigational Experience , 1997 .

[16]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  The large-display user experience , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[17]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  The Information Visualizer: A 3D User Interface for Information Retrieval , 1992, Advanced Visual Interfaces.

[18]  Rainer Stiefelhagen,et al.  Pointing gesture recognition based on 3D-tracking of face, hands and head orientation , 2003, ICMI '03.

[19]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[20]  James T. Enns The Thinking Eye, the Seeing Brain: Explorations in Visual Cognition , 2004 .

[21]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[22]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Wideband displays: mitigating multiple monitor seams , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[23]  Michael J. Rovine,et al.  Sketch-map variables as predictors of way-finding performance , 1989 .

[24]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Barehands: implement-free interaction with a wall-mounted display , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[25]  Ken Perlin,et al.  Pad: an alternative approach to the computer interface , 1993, SIGGRAPH.

[26]  Mark Ashdown,et al.  Combining head tracking and mouse input for a GUI on multiple monitors , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[27]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  SpaceTree: supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation , 2002, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2002. INFOVIS 2002..

[28]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[29]  Chris North,et al.  High-resolution gaming: Interfaces, notifications, and the user experience , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[30]  Chris North,et al.  Analysis of User Behavior on High-Resolution Tiled Displays , 2005, INTERACT.

[31]  Daniel Vogel,et al.  Distant freehand pointing and clicking on very large, high resolution displays , 2005, UIST.

[32]  Dan R. Olsen,et al.  Laser pointer interaction , 2001, CHI.

[33]  J G Hollands,et al.  ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE - THIRD EDITION , 2000 .

[34]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  The Task Gallery: a 3D window manager , 2000, CHI.

[35]  Chris North,et al.  The Perceptual Scalability of Visualization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[36]  George W. Fitzmaurice,et al.  A remote control interface for large displays , 2004, UIST '04.

[37]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Women take a wider view , 2002, CHI.