Measurement-based coherency identification and aggregation for power systems

Model reduction techniques are often applied to large-scale complex power systems to increase simulation performance. The bottleneck of existing methods to get a high reduction ratio lies in: (1) Coherency identification is static and conservative. Some coherent generators are not detected when system topology or operating point changes. (2) Solitary generators outside any coherency group are not aggregated regardless of their importance. To overcome the first problem, a measurement-based online coherency identification method was used in this paper. By analyzing post-fault trajectories measured by phasor measurement units (PMUs), coherency generators were identified through principal component analysis. The method can track conherency groups with time-varying system topology and operating points. To address the second problem, sensitivity analysis was employed into model reduction in this paper. The sensitivity of tie-line power flows against injected active power of external system generators was derived. Those generators having minimal impacts on tie-line power flows were replaced with negative impedances. Case studies show that the proposed method can handle well these solitary generators and the reduction ratio can be enhanced. Future work will include generalization of the sensitivity method.

[1]  Vijay Vittal,et al.  Application of dynamic equivalencing in large-scale power systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[2]  Anjan Bose,et al.  Comparison of algorithms for transient stability simulations on shared and distributed memory multiprocessors , 1996 .

[3]  O. Ruhle,et al.  Industrial approaches for dynamic equivalents of large power systems , 2002, 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309).

[4]  George C. Verghese,et al.  Extensions, simplifications, and tests of synchronic modal equivalencing (SME) , 1997 .

[5]  G. J. Rogers,et al.  Slow coherency based network partitioning including load buses , 1993 .

[6]  Mario A. Bochicchio,et al.  A distributed computing approach for real-time transient stability analysis , 1997 .

[7]  V. Vittal,et al.  Right-Sized Power System Dynamic Equivalents for Power System Operation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  George C. Verghese,et al.  Multi-dimensional synchrony and dynamic equivalence , 1995, Proceedings of International Conference on Control Applications.

[9]  N. Mithulananthan,et al.  Linear performance indices to predict oscillatory stability problems in power systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Z. Xu,et al.  Dynamic Reduction of Large Power System in PSS/E , 2005, 2005 IEEE/PES Transmission & Distribution Conference & Exposition: Asia and Pacific.

[11]  K. S. Rao,et al.  Coherency Based System Decomposition into Study and External Areas Using Weak Coupling , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[12]  Tongwen Chen,et al.  Wide-Area Control of Power Systems Through Delayed Network Communication , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[13]  B. Moore Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction , 1981 .

[14]  B. Chaudhuri,et al.  Coherency identification in power systems through principal component analysis , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Chih-Wen Liu,et al.  New methods for computing power system dynamic response for real-time transient stability prediction , 2000 .

[16]  N. Senroy,et al.  Generator Coherency Using the Hilbert–Huang Transform , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Shuai Lu,et al.  A review of dynamic generator reduction methods for transient stability studies , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[18]  Shaobu Wang,et al.  Analytical trajectory extrapolation for power systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[19]  M. Brucoli,et al.  Parallel‐in‐time method based on shifted‐picard iterations for power system ty‐ansient stability analysis , 2007 .

[20]  Joe H. Chow,et al.  Inertial and slow coherency aggregation algorithms for power system dynamic model reduction , 1995 .

[21]  L.-A. Dessaint,et al.  Dynamic equivalent modeling of large power systems using structure preservation technique , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  Tianshu Bi,et al.  WAMS Implementation in China and the Challenges for Bulk Power System Protection , 2007, 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[23]  George C. Verghese,et al.  Synchrony, aggregation, and multi-area eigenanalysis , 1995 .

[24]  J. H. Chow,et al.  Large-scale system testing of a power system dynamic equivalencing program , 1998 .

[25]  Chen-Ching Liu,et al.  Coherency and aggregation techniques incorporating rotor and voltage dynamics , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[26]  M. La Scala,et al.  Parallel-in-time implementation of transient stability simulations on a transputer network , 1994 .