Irreversible Fouling in MF/UF Membranes Caused by Natural Organic Matters (NOMs) Isolated from Different Origins

Abstract For more efficient use of membrane technology in water treatment, it is essential to understand more about the fouling that requires chemical cleaning to be eliminated (i.e., irreversible fouling). In this study, five different MF/UF membranes and four types of organic matter collected from different origins were examined in terms of the degree of irreversible membrane fouling. Experimental results demonstrated that the extent of irreversible fouling differed significantly depending on the properties of both the membrane and organic matter. Among the tested membranes, UF membranes made of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) exhibited the best performance in terms of prevention of irreversible fouling. In contrast, MF membranes, especially one made of polyvinylidenefluoride (PVDF), suffered significant irreversible fouling. Conventional methods for characterization of organic matter such as specific ultraviolet absorption (SUVA), XAD fractionation, and excitation‐emission matrix (EEM) were found to be inadequate for prediction of the degree of irreversible fouling. This is because these analytical methods represent an average property of bulk organic matter, while the fouling was actually caused by some specific fractions. It was revealed that hydrophilic fraction of the organic matter was responsible for the irreversible fouling regardless of the type of membranes or organic matter.

[1]  M R Wiesner,et al.  Peer reviewed: the promise of membrane technology. , 1999, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  E. Perdue,et al.  Three approaches for characterizing NOM , 1996 .

[3]  M. Clark,et al.  Adsorption of aquatic humic substances on hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes , 1994 .

[4]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  MEMBRANE FILTRATION OF NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER: INITIAL COMPARISON OF REJECTION AND FLUX DECLINE CHARACTERISTICS WITH ULTRAFILTRATION AND NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES , 1999 .

[5]  Kerry J. Howe,et al.  Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  T. Lin,et al.  Effects of humic substance characteristics on UF performance , 2000 .

[7]  O. Hao,et al.  Effect of functional groups of humic substances on uf performance. , 2001, Water research.

[8]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  The promise of membrane technology , 1999 .

[9]  Diane M. McKnight,et al.  Isolation of hydrophilic organic acids from water using nonionic macroporous resins , 1992 .

[10]  B. Bergamaschi,et al.  Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absorbance as an indicator of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic carbon. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  A. Zydney,et al.  Humic acid fouling during ultrafiltration , 2000 .

[12]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Using reverse osmosis to obtain organic matter from surface and ground waters , 1995 .

[13]  Samer Adham,et al.  Characteristics and costs of MF and UF plants , 1996 .

[14]  K. Kimura,et al.  Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. , 2004, Water research.

[15]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Coagulation pretreatment for ultrafiltration of a surface water , 1990 .

[16]  Brian Bolto,et al.  The fouling of microfiltration membranes by NOM after coagulation treatment , 2000 .

[17]  E. Thurman,et al.  Preparative isolation of aquatic humic substances. , 1981, Environmental science & technology.