Regulation of Hoxc-8 during mouse embryonic development: identification and characterization of critical elements involved in early neural tube expression.

We have characterized cis-acting elements that direct the early phase of Hoxc-8 expression using reporter gene analysis in transgenic mice. By deletion we show that a 135 bp DNA fragment, located approximately 3 kb upstream of the coding region of Hoxc-8, is capable of directing posterior neural tube expression. This early neural tube (ENT) enhancer consists of four separate elements, designated A, B, C and D, whose nucleotide sequences are similar to binding sites of known transcription factors. Nucleotide substitutions suggest that element A is an essential component of the ENT enhancer. However element A by itself is incapable of directing neural tube expression. This element requires interactions at any two of the other three elements, B, C or D. Thus, the components of the ENT enhancer direct neural tube expression in an interdependent manner. We propose that Hoxc-8 is activated in the neural tube by combinatorial interactions among several proteins acting within a small region. Our transgenic analyses provide a means to identify transcription factors that regulate Hoxc-8 expression during embryogenesis.

[1]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[2]  Richard S. Mann,et al.  Segmental expression of Hoxb-1 is controlled by a highly conserved autoregulatory loop dependent upon exd/pbx , 1995, Cell.

[3]  C. Bieberich,et al.  Gain of function mutations for paralogous Hox genes: implications for the evolution of Hox gene function. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  P. Traber,et al.  A homeodomain protein related to caudal regulates intestine-specific gene transcription , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[5]  P. Carlsson,et al.  Cloning and characterization of seven human forkhead proteins: binding site specificity and DNA bending. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[6]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Role of a conserved retinoic acid response element in rhombomere restriction of Hoxb-1. , 1994, Science.

[7]  Juan Botas,et al.  The DNA binding specificity of ultrabithorax is modulated by cooperative interactions with extradenticle, another homeoprotein , 1994, Cell.

[8]  C. Murre,et al.  extradenticle Raises the DNA binding specificity of homeotic selector gene products , 1994, Cell.

[9]  S. Brenner,et al.  A conserved retinoic acid response element required for early expression of the homeobox gene Hoxb-1 , 1994, Nature.

[10]  G. Edelman,et al.  Regulation in vitro of an L-CAM enhancer by homeobox genes HoxD9 and HNF-1. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Krumlauf.  Hox genes in vertebrate development , 1994, Cell.

[12]  Peter A. Lawrence,et al.  Homeobox genes: Their function in Drosophila segmentation and pattern formation , 1994, Cell.

[13]  E. Boncinelli,et al.  The thyroid transcription factor‐1 gene is a candidate target for regulation by Hox proteins. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[14]  R. James,et al.  Structure of the murine homeobox gene cdx-2. Expression in embryonic and adult intestinal epithelium. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  R. Costa,et al.  The DNA-binding specificity of the hepatocyte nuclear factor 3/forkhead domain is influenced by amino-acid residues adjacent to the recognition helix , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[16]  S. Gaunt,et al.  Forward spreading in the establishment of a vertebrate Hox expression boundary: The expression domain separates into anterior and posterior zones, and the spread occurs across implanted glass barriers , 1994, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[17]  R. James,et al.  Isolation and characterization of the murine homeobox gene Cdx-1. Regulation of expression in intestinal epithelial cells. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[18]  J. Rossant,et al.  The formation and maintenance of the definitive endoderm lineage in the mouse: involvement of HNF3/forkhead proteins. , 1993, Development.

[19]  A. Fainsod,et al.  Isolation and characterization of target sequences of the chicken CdxA homeobox gene. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  C. Wright,et al.  Murine Cdx-4 bears striking similarities to the Drosophila caudal gene in its homeodomain sequence and early expression pattern , 1993, Mechanisms of Development.

[21]  K. Kaestner,et al.  Six members of the mouse forkhead gene family are developmentally regulated. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  B. Hogan,et al.  Differential expression of multiple fork head related genes during gastrulation and axial pattern formation in the mouse embryo. , 1993, Development.

[23]  M. Wijgerde,et al.  Two phases in the establishment of HOX expression domains. , 1993, Developmental biology.

[24]  D. Jackson,et al.  Modulation of liver-specific transcription by interactions between hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 and nuclear factor 1 binding DNA in close apposition , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[25]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  The zinc finger gene Krox20 regulates HoxB2 (Hox2.8) during hindbrain segmentation , 1993, Cell.

[26]  C. Bieberich,et al.  Altering the boundaries of Hox3.1 expression: Evidence for antipodal gene regulation , 1992, Cell.

[27]  W. Rutter,et al.  Synergistic activation of the insulin gene by a LIM-homeo domain protein and a basic helix-loop-helix protein: building a functional insulin minienhancer complex. , 1992, Genes & development.

[28]  H. Pöpperl,et al.  An autoregulatory element of the murine Hox‐4.2 gene. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[29]  P. Brûlet,et al.  Homeosis in the mouse induced by a null mutation in the Hox-3.1 gene , 1992, Cell.

[30]  C. Desplan,et al.  The homeodomain: A new face for the helix‐turn‐helix? , 1992, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[31]  M. Rudnicki,et al.  Simplified mammalian DNA isolation procedure. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  M. Shago,et al.  Expression of a retinoic acid response element-hsplacZ transgene defines specific domains of transcriptional activity during mouse embryogenesis. , 1991, Genes & development.

[33]  C. DiPersio,et al.  Extracellular signals that regulate liver transcription factors during hepatic differentiation in vitro , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[34]  F. Ruddle,et al.  Evidence for positive and negative regulation of the Hox-3.1 gene. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  F. Ruddle,et al.  Structural analysis of the Hox-3.1 transcription unit and the Hox-3.2--Hox-3.1 intergenic region. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Differential expression of Hox 3.1 protein in subregions of the embryonic and adult spinal cord. , 1990, Development.

[37]  C. S. Parker,et al.  The caudal gene product is a direct activator of fushi tarazu transcription during Drosophila embryogenesis , 1989, Nature.

[38]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression , 1989, Cell.

[39]  D. Duboule,et al.  The structural and functional organization of the murine HOX gene family resembles that of Drosophila homeotic genes. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[40]  J. Rossant,et al.  Inducible expression of an hsp68-lacZ hybrid gene in transgenic mice. , 1989, Development.

[41]  R. Keynes,et al.  Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain , 1989, Nature.

[42]  P Gruss,et al.  A mouse gene homologous to the Drosophila gene caudal is expressed in epithelial cells from the embryonic intestine. , 1988, Genes & development.

[43]  S. Gaunt.  Mouse homeobox gene transcripts occupy different but overlapping domains in embryonic germ layers and organs: a comparison of Hox-3.1 and Hox-1.5. , 1988, Development.

[44]  P. Gruss,et al.  Primary structure and developmental expression pattern of Hox 3.1, a member of the murine Hox 3 homeobox gene cluster. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[45]  F. Ruddle,et al.  Region-specific expression of two mouse homeo box genes , 1987, Science.

[46]  F H Ruddle,et al.  Genetic transformation of mouse embryos by microinjection of purified DNA. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  F. Sanger,et al.  DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Oliver H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[49]  F H Ruddle,et al.  Evolution of Hox genes. , 1994, Annual review of genetics.

[50]  B I Meyer,et al.  Mouse Cdx-1 expression during gastrulation. , 1993, Development.

[51]  P. Brûlet,et al.  Pattern of transcription of the homeo gene Hox-3.1 in the mouse embryo. , 1988, Genes & development.

[52]  William McGinnis,et al.  Spatial restriction in expression of a mouse homoeo box locus within the central nervous system , 1986, Nature.