How Teachers Evolve Their Formative Assessment Practices When Digital Tools Are Involved in the Classroom

Formative assessment is a process that can inform both teachers and students of their understanding of knowledge at stake. Technology can enable data about student understanding to be collected, organised and shared in novel ways. The FaSMEd project aims to study how technology can play an effective role within a formative assessment process. This article presents a case study that allows us to understand better how a teacher processes data from student use of technology (e.g., tablets, a student response system, interactive whiteboards) and how he uses it to inform his teaching. Our observations in a grade 9 tablet-using classroom show that technology can be considered as an element of the classroom milieu facilitating the process of formative assessment. Both the teacher and the students took advantage of the interpretation of data: the teacher modified his teaching regarding students’ responses, while the students improved their learning in response to the teacher’s feedback.

[1]  Hye Sook Shin,et al.  Classroom connectivity in Algebra I classrooms: results of a randomized control trial , 2012 .

[2]  Chee-Kit Looi,et al.  Community-based individual knowledge construction in the classroom: a process-oriented account , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[3]  Clare Lee,et al.  Assessment for Learning- putting it into practice , 2003 .

[4]  Alison Clark-Wilson,et al.  Emergent pedagogies and the changing role of the teacher in the TI-Nspire Navigator-networked mathematics classroom , 2010 .

[5]  Luc Trouche,et al.  Managing the Complexity of Human/Machine Interactions in Computerized Learning Environments: Guiding Students’ Command Process through Instrumental Orchestrations , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[6]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  Design research in mathematics education : the case of an ict-rich learning arrangement for the concept of function , 2013 .

[7]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology , 2006 .

[8]  P. Rabardel.  Les hommes et les technologies; approche cognitive des instruments contemporains , 1995 .

[9]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  A walk on the WILD side How wireless handhelds may change computer-supported collaborative learning , 2002 .

[10]  Gilles Aldon.  Didactic Incidents: A Way to Improve the Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers , 2014 .

[11]  Marie-Claire Combes,et al.  Nouvel environnement technologique, nouvelles ressources, nouveaux modes de travail : le projet e-CoLab (expérimentation Collaborative de Laboratoires mathématiques) , 2008 .

[12]  Michèle Artigue,et al.  Learning Mathematics in a CAS Environment: The Genesis of a Reflection about Instrumentation and the Dialectics between Technical and Conceptual Work , 2002, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[13]  Maddalena Taras.  Where is the Theory in Assessment for Learning , 2012 .

[14]  Donovan R. Walling.  Designing Learning for Tablet Classrooms , 2014 .

[15]  Jeremy Roschelle,et al.  THE NATURE AND FUTURE OF CLASSROOM CONNECTIVITY: THE DIALECTICS OF MATHEMATICS IN THE SOCIAL SPACE , 2002 .

[16]  P. Black,et al.  Developing the theory of formative assessment , 2009 .

[17]  M. Carter.  Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta‐analyses relating to achievement , 2009 .

[18]  Guy Brousseau,et al.  Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics: Didactique des Mathématiques, 1970-1990 , 2014 .