Realisation of high-fidelity nonadiabatic CZ gates with superconducting qubits

Entangling gates with error rates reaching the threshold for quantum error correction have been reported for CZ gates using adiabatic longitudinal control based on the interaction between the |11〉 and |20〉 states. Here, we design and implement nonadiabatic CZ gates, which outperform adiabatic gates in terms of speed and fidelity, with gate times reaching $$1.25/(2\sqrt 2 g_{01,10})$$1.25∕(22g01,10), and fidelities reaching 99.54 ± 0.08%. Nonadiabatic gates are found to have proportionally less incoherent error than adiabatic gates thanks to their fast gate times, which leave more room for further improvements in the design of the control pules to eliminate coherent errors. We also show that state leakage can be reduced to below 0.2% with optimisation. Furthermore, the gate optimisation process is highly feasible: experimental optimisation can be expected to take less than four hours. Finally, the gate design process can be extended to CCZ gates, and our preliminary results suggest that this process would be feasible as well, if we can measure the CCZ fidelity separate from the initialisation and readout errors in experimental optimisation.

[1]  D. Tannor,et al.  Tunable, Flexible, and Efficient Optimization of Control Pulses for Practical Qubits. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[2]  Sophie Shermer Training Schrödinger’s cat: quantum optimal control , 2015 .

[3]  Christiane P. Koch,et al.  Training Schrödinger’s cat: quantum optimal control , 2015, 1508.00442.

[4]  Luigi Frunzio,et al.  Realization of three-qubit quantum error correction with superconducting circuits , 2011, Nature.

[5]  R. Blatt,et al.  Towards fault-tolerant quantum computing with trapped ions , 2008, 0803.2798.

[6]  Sabrina Hong,et al.  Demonstration of universal parametric entangling gates on a multi-qubit lattice , 2017, Science Advances.

[7]  Jay M. Gambetta,et al.  Universal Gate for Fixed-Frequency Qubits via a Tunable Bus , 2016, 1604.03076.

[8]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[9]  J. P. Dehollain,et al.  A two-qubit logic gate in silicon , 2014, Nature.

[10]  J. Gambetta,et al.  Procedure for systematically tuning up cross-talk in the cross-resonance gate , 2016, 1603.04821.

[11]  Liang Jiang,et al.  A CNOT gate between multiphoton qubits encoded in two cavities , 2017, Nature Communications.

[12]  E Solano,et al.  Dynamical Casimir effect entangles artificial atoms. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[13]  J. Martinis,et al.  Fast adiabatic qubit gates using only σ z control , 2014, 1402.5467.

[14]  S. Girvin,et al.  Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box , 2007, cond-mat/0703002.

[15]  Chad Rigetti,et al.  Fully microwave-tunable universal gates in superconducting qubits with linear couplings and fixed transition frequencies , 2010 .

[16]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Quantum Process Tomography: Resource Analysis of Different Strategies , 2007, quant-ph/0702131.

[17]  Andreas Angerer,et al.  Smooth Optimal Quantum Control for Robust Solid-State Spin Magnetometry. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[18]  B. Foxen,et al.  Diabatic Gates for Frequency-Tunable Superconducting Qubits. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[19]  Jay M. Gambetta,et al.  Self-Consistent Quantum Process Tomography , 2012, 1211.0322.

[20]  F. Poggiali,et al.  Optimal Control for One-Qubit Quantum Sensing , 2017, Physical Review X.

[21]  John M. Martinis,et al.  Logic gates at the surface code threshold: Superconducting qubits poised for fault-tolerant quantum computing , 2014 .

[22]  Barry C Sanders,et al.  High-Fidelity Single-Shot Toffoli Gate via Quantum Control. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[23]  Frank K. Wilhelm,et al.  Ju l 2 01 5 Gradient optimization of analytic controls : the route to high accuracy quantum optimal control , 2022 .

[24]  Frederick W Strauch,et al.  Quantum logic gates for coupled superconducting phase qubits. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[25]  R. Barends,et al.  Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance , 2014, Nature.

[26]  H. Neven,et al.  Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices , 2016, Nature Physics.

[27]  L. DiCarlo,et al.  Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor , 2009, Nature.

[28]  Yu-xi Liu,et al.  An efficient and compact switch for quantum circuits , 2018, npj Quantum Information.

[29]  G. Wendin Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review , 2016, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[30]  Liang Jiang,et al.  Implementing a universal gate set on a logical qubit encoded in an oscillator , 2016, Nature Communications.

[31]  A N Cleland,et al.  Optimal quantum control using randomized benchmarking. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[32]  R. Barends,et al.  Coherent Josephson qubit suitable for scalable quantum integrated circuits. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[33]  M. Mariantoni,et al.  Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation , 2012, 1208.0928.

[34]  C. Degen,et al.  High-Resolution Quantum Sensing with Shaped Control Pulses. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[35]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Experimental Demonstration of a Resonator-Induced Phase Gate in a Multiqubit Circuit-QED System. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[36]  Jiangfeng Du,et al.  Experimental fault-tolerant universal quantum gates with solid-state spins under ambient conditions , 2015, Nature Communications.

[37]  Barry C. Sanders,et al.  Learning in quantum control: High-dimensional global optimization for noisy quantum dynamics , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[38]  Shi-Biao Zheng,et al.  Continuous-variable geometric phase and its manipulation for quantum computation in a superconducting circuit , 2017, Nature Communications.

[39]  Zijun Chen,et al.  Measuring and Suppressing Quantum State Leakage in a Superconducting Qubit. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[40]  Ponnuthurai N. Suganthan,et al.  Differential Evolution Algorithm with Ensemble of Parameters and Mutation and Crossover Strategies , 2010, SEMCCO.

[41]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Quantum optimization using variational algorithms on near-term quantum devices , 2017, Quantum Science and Technology.

[42]  C. C. Bultink,et al.  Feedback control of a solid-state qubit using high-fidelity projective measurement. , 2012, Physical review letters.