Interactions in processing segmental and suprasegmental features of speech

A speeded classification task was used to determine the nature of the dependency relation that exists during the processing of a segmental distinction in vowel quality and a suprasegmental distinction in pitch (Experiment 1) or loudness (Experiment 2) in a consonantvowel syllable. In both experiments, evidence was found for a mutual, symmetrical dependency between the processes underlying the analysis of the segmental and suprasegmental information in the syllable. This type of interaction pattern contrasts with the pattern of unidirectional dependency previously found for the analysis of a consonantal distinction and a suprasegmental distinction, in which the analysis of the consonantal information was found to be dependent on the analysis of the suprasegmental information (e.g., Wood, 1974). Together with these earlier findings, the present results clearly indicate that the form of the interaction between processes responsible for segmental and suprasegmental analysis is a function of the type of segmental information being analyzed. Future research must determine whether the distinct interaction patterns found thus far for consonants and vowels are due to a difference in phonetic class per se, i.e., consonant vs. vowel, or to a difference in the nature of the acoustic information specifying the consonant and vowel.

[1]  W. E. Hick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[2]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Category boundaries for linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions of the same stimuli , 1974 .

[3]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[4]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Acoustic memory and the perception of speech , 1974 .

[5]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Parallel processing of auditory and phonetic information in speech discrimination , 1974 .

[6]  V C Tartter,et al.  Asymmetric dependencies in processing phonetic features , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  D. Pisoni Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels , 1973, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Auditory Evoked Potentials during Speech Perception , 1971, Science.

[10]  Κ. Ν. Stevens On the Relations between Speech Movements and Speech Perception , 1968 .

[11]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Failure of selective attention to phonetic segments in consonant-vowel syllables , 1975 .

[12]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  The Relation between Identification and Discrimination along Speech and Non-Speech Continua , 1963 .

[13]  C C Wood,et al.  Auditory and phonetic levels of processing in speech perception: neurophysiological and information-processing analyses. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Hemispheric processing of intonation contours. , 1974, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[15]  R. Pastore,et al.  Processing interaction between two dimensions of nonphonetic auditory signals. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  R. S. Day,et al.  Processing two dimensions of nonspeech stimuli: the auditory-phonetic distinction reconsidered. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  C. Darwin Ear Differences in the Recall of Fricatives and Vowels , 1971, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.