Evaluation of coronary flow conditions in complex coronary artery bifurcations stenting using computational fluid dynamics: Impact of final proximal optimization technique on different double-stent techniques.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) have been recently adopted in many fields of cardiovascular medicine and in interventional cardiology. Using CFD analysis we compared the use of different PCI procedures, with and without the utilization of a proximal optimization technique (POT), on a complex coronary artery bifurcation. METHODS/MATERIALS For the analysis, we considered a hypothetic model of a left anterior descending artery-diagonal Medina 1,1,1 bifurcation type with a diameter of the proximal main branch (MB) and the side branch (SB) set at 3.5mm and 2.5mm, respectively. The bifurcation angle has been set to 50°. For the stent simulation, we reconstructed a third-generation, ultra-thin strut everolimus-eluting stent (ORSIRO stent, Biotronik IC, Bulack, Switzerland). RESULTS The Nano-crush and the modified T techniques seem able to restore the most physiologic fluid dynamic profile. Conversely, the DK-crush and the culotte demonstrated an intermediate and worst effect, respectively. The addition of a final POT resulted favorably for both Nano-crush and reverse modified T techniques, whereas a neutral and lack of significant effects have been observed for the DK-crush and culotte technique, respectively. CONCLUSION Different double-stenting techniques (DST) have a different impact on coronary flow physiology. Both Nano-crush and modified T techniques achieved the most physiologic profile. The addition of a final POT appears to be a favourable step for both Nano-crush and modified T.

[1]  M. Gavaises,et al.  Simulation of cardiac motion on non-Newtonian, pulsating flow development in the human left anterior descending coronary artery , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Y. Cho,et al.  Effects of the non-Newtonian viscosity of blood on flows in a diseased arterial vessel. Part 1: Steady flows. , 1991, Biorheology.

[3]  Yves Louvard,et al.  Definitions and classifications of bifurcation lesions and treatment. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  H. Goldsmith,et al.  Flow Patterns in Vessels of Simple and Complex Geometries a , 1987, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  R. de Caterina,et al.  Late thrombosis after double versus single drug-eluting stent in the treatment of coronary bifurcations: a meta-analysis of randomized and observational Studies. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[6]  M. Morice,et al.  Provisional side branch‐stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions , 2013, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  Michael C. McDaniel,et al.  Coronary Artery Wall Shear Stress Is Associated With Progression and Transformation of Atherosclerotic Plaque and Arterial Remodeling in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease , 2011, Circulation.

[8]  G. Faggian,et al.  Mathematics and Cardiovascular Interventions: Role of the Finite Element Modeling in Clinical Decision Making. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  Jun-Jie Zhang,et al.  A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the DKCRUSH-II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) trial. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Rémy Prost,et al.  Fractal geometry of arterial coronary bifurcations: a quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound analysis. , 2008, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[11]  Manolis Gavaises,et al.  Flow Patterns at Stented Coronary Bifurcations: Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[12]  M. Leon,et al.  Impact of the complexity of bifurcation lesions treated with drug-eluting stents: the DEFINITION study (Definitions and impact of complEx biFurcation lesIons on clinical outcomes after percutaNeous coronary IntervenTIOn using drug-eluting steNts). , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[13]  R. Krams,et al.  Final proximal post-dilatation is necessary after kissing balloon in bifurcation stenting. , 2011, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  B. Li,et al.  Stenting strategy for coronary artery bifurcation with drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of nine randomised trials and systematic review. , 2014, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  Goran Stankovic,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: 11th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. , 2016, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  M. Niemelä,et al.  Clinical outcome after crush versus culotte stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic Stent Technique Study 36-month follow-up results. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[17]  S. Helqvist,et al.  Stent treatment of coronary artery bifurcation lesions. , 2007, European heart journal.

[18]  J. Ohayon,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Sequential Proximal Optimizing Technique Versus Kissing Balloon Inflation Technique in Provisional Bifurcation Stenting: Fractal Coronary Bifurcation Bench Test. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[19]  M. Niemelä,et al.  Coronary bifurcation lesions treated with simple or complex stenting: 5-year survival from patient-level pooled analysis of the Nordic Bifurcation Study and the British Bifurcation Coronary Study. , 2016, European heart journal.

[20]  Peter Mortier,et al.  Kissing balloon or sequential dilation of the side branch and main vessel for provisional stenting of bifurcations: lessons from micro-computed tomography and computational simulations. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[21]  A. Mazza,et al.  Complex coronary bifurcation revascularization by means of very minimal crushing and ultrathin biodegradable polymer DES: Feasibility and 1-year outcomes of the "Nano-crush" technique. , 2017, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[22]  J. Davies,et al.  Crush, culotte, T and protrusion: which 2-stent technique for treatment of true bifurcation lesions? - insights from in vitro experiments and micro-computed tomography. , 2013, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[23]  Barbara M. Johnston,et al.  Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: steady state simulations. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Shao-Liang Chen,et al.  Provisional vs. two-stent technique for unprotected left main coronary artery disease after ten years follow up: A propensity matched analysis. , 2016, International journal of cardiology.

[25]  A. Colombo,et al.  Bifurcation lesions: no need to implant two stents when one is sufficient! , 2016, European heart journal.