A general framework for the distance–decay of similarity in ecological communities

Species spatial turnover, or β-diversity, induces a decay of community similarity with geographic distance known as the distance–decay relationship. Although this relationship is central to biodiversity and biogeography, its theoretical underpinnings remain poorly understood. Here, we develop a general framework to describe how the distance–decay relationship is influenced by population aggregation and the landscape-scale species-abundance distribution. We utilize this general framework and data from three tropical forests to show that rare species have a weak influence on distance–decay curves, and that overall similarity and rates of decay are primarily influenced by species abundances and population aggregation respectively. We illustrate the utility of the framework by deriving an exact analytical expression of the distance–decay relationship when population aggregation is characterized by the Poisson Cluster Process. Our study provides a foundation for understanding the distance–decay relationship, and for predicting and testing patterns of beta-diversity under competing theories in ecology. Ecology Letters (2008) 11: 904–917

[1]  M. Westoby,et al.  Spatial scaling of microbial eukaryote diversity , 2004, Nature.

[2]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Dispersal, Environment, and Floristic Variation of Western Amazonian Forests , 2003, Science.

[3]  J. Harte,et al.  Self-similarity and clustering in the spatial distribution of species. , 2000, Science.

[4]  R. Whittaker.  Evolution and measurement of species diversity , 1972 .

[5]  B. McGill,et al.  A unified theory for macroecology based on spatial patterns of abundance , 2003 .

[6]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  A latitudinal gradient in large-scale beta diversity for vascular plants in North America. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[7]  W. Bossert,et al.  Habitat heterogeneity and niche structure of trees in two tropical rain forests , 2004, Oecologia.

[8]  A. Solow,et al.  Measuring biological diversity , 2006, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[9]  A. Kerkhoff,et al.  Microbes on mountainsides: Contrasting elevational patterns of bacterial and plant diversity , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Beta diversity of angiosperms in temperate floras of eastern Asia and eastern North America , 2004 .

[11]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[12]  P. Brown,et al.  Second‐Order Analysis of Inhomogeneous Spatial Point Processes Using Case–Control Data , 2007, Biometrics.

[13]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Rings, circles, and null-models for point pattern analysis in ecology , 2004 .

[14]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[15]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  Joshua B. Plotkin,et al.  SAMPLING THE SPECIES COMPOSITION OF A LANDSCAPE , 2002 .

[17]  James H Brown,et al.  The wealth of species: ecological communities, complex systems and the legacy of Frank Preston. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[18]  H. Toch,et al.  Distribution of patterns. , 2002 .

[19]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[20]  S. Miller,et al.  Low beta diversity of herbivorous insects in tropical forests , 2007, Nature.

[21]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  A spatially explicit neutral model of beta-diversity in tropical forests. , 2002, Theoretical population biology.

[22]  R. Whittaker.  Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California , 1960 .

[23]  A. Kinzig,et al.  Estimating species-area relationships from plot to landscape scale using species spatial-turnover data , 1999 .

[24]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Community Patterns in Source‐Sink Metacommunities , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[25]  Jessica Green,et al.  ENDEMICS–AREA RELATIONSHIPS: THE INFLUENCE OF SPECIES DOMINANCE AND SPATIAL AGGREGATION , 2003 .

[26]  R. Condit,et al.  Tree species distributions and local habitat variation in the Amazon: large forest plot in eastern Ecuador , 2004 .

[27]  J. Elith,et al.  Using generalized dissimilarity modelling to analyse and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment , 2007 .

[28]  R. Jobe.  Estimating landscape-scale species richness: reconciling frequency- and turnover-based approaches. , 2008, Ecology.

[29]  P. White,et al.  The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology , 1999 .

[30]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Understanding the targets of different methods of analysis. , 2006, Ecology.

[31]  A. Magurran,et al.  Measuring Biological Diversity , 2004 .

[32]  The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography Stephen P. Hubbell , 2005 .

[33]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  A Spatially Explicit Neutral Model of β-Diversity in Tropical Forests , 2002 .

[34]  F. W. Preston.  The Canonical Distribution of Commonness and Rarity: Part I , 1962 .

[35]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  Cluster Analysis of Spatial Patterns in Malaysian Tree Species , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[36]  Joshua B Plotkin,et al.  A statistical theory for sampling species abundances. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[37]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  SPECIES DIVERSITY PATTERNS DERIVED FROM SPECIES–AREA MODELS , 2002 .

[38]  Noel A. C. Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data: Cressie/Statistics , 1993 .

[39]  Todd M. Scanlon,et al.  Positive feedbacks promote power-law clustering of Kalahari vegetation , 2007, Nature.

[40]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Tree Dispersion, Abundance, and Diversity in a Tropical Dry Forest , 1979, Science.

[41]  T. Hughes,et al.  Scale-dependent variation in coral community similarity across sites, islands, and island groups. , 2007, Ecology.

[42]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Distribution patterns of tree species in a Malaysian tropical rain forest , 1997 .

[43]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Analyzing the spatial structure of a Sri Lankan tree species with multiple scales of clustering. , 2007, Ecology.

[44]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Soil nutrients influence spatial distributions of tropical tree species , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Beta-Diversity in Tropical Forest Trees , 2002, Science.

[46]  Joshua B Plotkin,et al.  Seed Dispersal and Spatial Pattern in Tropical Trees , 2006, PLoS biology.

[47]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. , 2000, Science.

[48]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The geographical structure of British bird distributions: diversity, spatial turnover and scale , 2001 .

[49]  W. Sloan,et al.  Taxa-area relationships for microbes: the unsampled and the unseen. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[50]  K. Gaston,et al.  Pattern and Process in Macroecology , 2000 .

[51]  G. C. Stevens,et al.  Spatial Variation in Abundance , 1995 .

[52]  A. Kinzig,et al.  On the implications of species-area relationships for endemism, spatial turnover, and food web patterns , 1997 .

[53]  P. Legendre,et al.  ANALYZING BETA DIVERSITY: PARTITIONING THE SPATIAL VARIATION OF COMMUNITY COMPOSITION DATA , 2005 .

[54]  B. Houchmandzadeh,et al.  Clustering in neutral ecology. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[55]  Robert I. McDonald,et al.  The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities , 2007 .

[56]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns , 1983 .

[57]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[58]  J. Harte,et al.  Estimating species richness at large spatial scales using data from small discrete plots , 2004 .

[59]  J. Plotkin,et al.  Species-area curves, spatial aggregation, and habitat specialization in tropical forests. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.