The politics of IS evaluation: a social shaping perspective

A considerable amount of research has already been conducted in the IT/IS evaluation arena, yet rewards remain elusive. This has been variously explained and in this paper we aim to realize two objectives: first, to examine some particular political and social aspects of evaluation processes in organizations and, second, to show the potential contribution of a social shaping approach to information systems research. A social shaping approach is attractive because it emphasizes a view of technological development as a social process as well as providing a framework for understanding the context in which technologies are displaced. Social shaping approaches encourage a concentration on the social and political processes through which terms such as failure, disaster, benefits, or successes come to be ascribed to technological systems. By highlighting the subjective element of evaluation procedures that produce such terms, we hope to contribute to the evaluation literature. A case study approach is used to illustrate the process and role of IS evaluations and emphasizes the dual exercise of evaluations for the purpose of user enrolment and to justify decisions in hindsight.

[1]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Coping with information technology? How British executives perceive the key information systems management issues in the mid-1990s , 1994, J. Inf. Technol..

[2]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society , 1984 .

[3]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Information Systems Management Issues for the 1990s , 1991, MIS Q..

[4]  M. Callon Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[5]  R. Westrum The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[6]  Michael B. Usher,et al.  Science in action , 1993, Nature.

[7]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  Evaluation of information systems: a critical assessment , 1998 .

[8]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change ed. by Wiebe E. Bijker, John Law (review) , 1994, Technology and Culture.

[9]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[10]  W. Dutton,et al.  The Social Shaping of Information Superhighways: European and American Roads to the Information Society , 1997 .

[11]  L. Willcocks,et al.  In search of information technology productivity: Assessment issues , 1997 .

[12]  V. Vroom,et al.  Leadership and decision-making , 1975 .

[13]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Management Consultants: Systems Development, Power and the Translation of Problems , 1992 .

[14]  R. Bhaskar A realist theory of science , 1976 .

[15]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[16]  Leslie P. Willcocks Information management - the evaluation of information systems investments , 1994 .

[17]  A. Davies,et al.  Shaping Women's Work: Gender, Employment and Information Technology , 2001 .

[18]  Guy G. Gable,et al.  Integrating case study and survey research methods: an example in information systems , 1994 .

[19]  David Targett,et al.  A taxonomy of information systems applications: the benefits' evaluation ladder , 1995 .

[20]  Joan A. Ballantine,et al.  Information systems/technology evaluation practices: evidence from UK organizations , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[21]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  Analysing information systems evaluation: another look at an old problem , 1998 .

[22]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the dynamics of science and technology : sociology of science in the real world , 1988 .

[23]  B. Latour Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[24]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Why information systems fail: a case study approach , 1993 .

[25]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Coping with Information Technology? how British Executives Perceive the Key Information Systems Management Issues in the Mid-1990s , 1994 .

[26]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[27]  John Brazier,et al.  Evaluating Health Services' Effectiveness , 1992 .

[28]  A. Sayer,et al.  Realism and Social Science , 1999 .

[29]  J. Law A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[30]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Social Construction of Technology , 2009 .

[31]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930 , 1984 .

[32]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[33]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Paper traces: inscribing organisation and information technology , 1997 .