Common- and Differential-Mode Conducted Emissions Measurements using Conventional Receivers versus FFT-Based Receivers

Electromagnetic interference (EMI) instrumentation has significantly evolved over the last thirty years. In this paper, the classical architecture of a conventional receiver is described and compared with the newest architecture of a Fast-Fourier-transform (FFT) based receiver. Additionally, different ways to measure the modal emissions, that is, the common and differential modes, with both types of receivers are described. In a conventional receiver, modal emissions can be measured using an external noise separator. In a dual-port FFT-based receiver, this can be done in the digital domain. Both receivers have been used to measure a device under test emitting non-stationary interference.

[1]  F. Fiori,et al.  Evaluation of the Common Mode and the Differential Mode Components From Conducted Emission Measurements , 2022, IEEE transactions on electromagnetic compatibility (Print).

[2]  L. Xiaoguang,et al.  Design of common mode and differential mode separator for electromagnetic noise based on autotransformer , 2021, 2021 IEEE International Joint EMC/SI/PI and EMC Europe Symposium.

[3]  Xiong Liu,et al.  Systematic Common-Mode Filter Design for Inverter-Driven Motor System Based on In-Circuit Impedance Extraction , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[4]  Cassiano Rech,et al.  Design of Common and Differential Mode Filters for Single-Phase Full-Bridge Photovoltaic Inverters , 2019, 2019 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference - Latin America (ISGT Latin America).

[5]  Jonathan Robinson,et al.  Modeling and Design of Common Mode and Differential Mode Filter for PWM Converters , 2019, 2019 10th International Conference on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia (ICPE 2019 - ECCE Asia).

[6]  Ping Xu,et al.  A new method of eliminating indeterminacy in ICA for conducted EMI separation , 2016, 2016 IEEE 8th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC-ECCE Asia).

[7]  Johann W. Kolar,et al.  The Input Impedance of Common-Mode and Differential-Mode Noise Separators , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[8]  J. Regué,et al.  Automated Power-Line Filter Design Under High 50-Hz Current Load Conditions , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[9]  Sergio A. Pignari,et al.  Device Modeling for Nonstationary Conducted Emissions Based on Frequency- and Time-Domain Measurements , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[10]  S. Tenbohlen,et al.  Prospects and limits of common- and differential-mode separation for the filter development process , 2008, 2008 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC Europe.

[11]  P. Russer,et al.  A Real-Time Time-Domain EMI Measurement System for Full-Compliance Measurements According to CISPR 16-1-1 , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[12]  R. Sivaramakrishnan,et al.  Design of low cost common and differential mode noise diagnostic circuit , 2006, 2006 9th International Conference on Electromagnetic Interference and Compatibility (INCEMIC 2006).

[13]  P. Russer,et al.  A low-noise multiresolution high-dynamic ultra-broad-band time-domain EMI measurement system , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[14]  F.C. Lee,et al.  Characterization, evaluation, and design of noise Separator for conducted EMI noise diagnosis , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[15]  P. Russer,et al.  Quasi-peak detector model for a time-domain measurement system , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[16]  M. J. Nave,et al.  A novel differential mode rejection network for conducted emissions diagnostics , 1989, National Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[17]  Clayton R. Paul,et al.  Diagnosis and reduction of conducted noise emissions , 1988, IEEE 1988 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[18]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.

[19]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[20]  Albrecht Rüdiger,et al.  Spectrum and spectral density estimation by the Discrete Fourier transform (DFT), including a comprehensive list of window functions and some new at-top windows , 2002 .