Design Research with Educational Systems: Investigating and Supporting Improvements in the Quality of Mathematics Teaching and Learning at Scale

This chapter describes a partnership with four urban districts that aimed to develop an empirically grounded theory of action for improving the quality of mathematics instruction at scale. Each year, we conducted a data collection, analysis, and feedback cycle in each district that involved documenting the district's improvement strategies, collecting and analyzing data to assess how these strategies were being implemented, reporting the findings to the district, and making recommendations about how the strategies might be revised. We distinguish between two distinct levels of analysis: providing the districts with timely evidence of how their strategies were playing out in schools, and testing and elaborating the conjectures that comprise our theory of action for instructional improvement. We clarify the crucial role that two research tools played at each level of analysis: our emerging theory of action and an interpretive framework that we used to assess the potential of each district's strategies to contribute to instructional improvement. We also illustrate that our collaboration with the four districts instantiates the basic tenets of design-based implementation research and involved conducting systematic inquiry to develop theory related to improving the quality of classroom instruction and student learning at the system level.

[1]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[2]  Beyond the Policy Memo: Designing to Strengthen the Practice of District Central Office Leadership for Instructional Improvement at Scale , 2013 .

[3]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Supporting Students' Development of Measuring Conceptions: Analyzing Students' Learning in Social Context , 2003 .

[4]  C. Coburn,et al.  District Policy and Teachers’ Social Networks , 2008 .

[5]  J. Lave,et al.  Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context , 1996 .

[6]  Edward A. Silver,et al.  Implementing Standards-Based Mathematics Instruction: A Casebook for Professional Development , 2009 .

[7]  W. Penuel,et al.  Organizing Research and Development at the Intersection of Learning, Implementation, and Design , 2011 .

[8]  James P. Spillane External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment , 1999 .

[9]  Filippo Graziani,et al.  Instructional Activities as a Tool for Teachers' and Teacher Educators' Learning , 2009, The Elementary School Journal.

[10]  A. Kelly Design Research in Education: Yes, but is it Methodological? , 2004 .

[11]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Reconstructing Conceptions of Local Capacity: The Local Education Agency’s Capacity for Ambitious Instructional Reform , 1997 .

[12]  Margaret S. Smith,et al.  Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions: Five Practices for Helping Teachers Move Beyond Show and Tell , 2008 .

[13]  Kenneth J. Rowe,et al.  The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leadership Types , 2008 .

[14]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. , 2009 .

[15]  Meredith I. Honig District Central Offices as Learning Organizations: How Sociocultural and Organizational Learning Theories Elaborate District Central Office Administrators' Participation in Teaching and Learning Improvement Efforts , 2008, American Journal of Education.

[16]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Modeling Natural Variation Through Distribution , 2004 .

[17]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  District Development as a Means of Improving Mathematics Teaching and Learning at Scale , 2008 .

[18]  J. Remillard Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula , 2005 .

[19]  Melissa D. Boston,et al.  Assessing Instructional Quality in Mathematics , 2012, The Elementary School Journal.

[20]  S. Giles Theory in practice. , 1993, Nursing times.

[21]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[22]  Ilana Seidel Horn,et al.  Attending to Problems of Practice: Routines and Resources for Professional Learning in Teachers’ Workplace Interactions , 2010 .

[23]  M. Franke,et al.  Developing Pedagogies in Teacher Education to Support Novice Teachers' Ability to Enact Ambitious Instruction , 2009 .

[24]  Magdalene Lampert,et al.  Learning Teaching in, from, and for Practice: What Do We Mean? , 2010 .

[25]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[26]  L. Resnick,et al.  Beyond Classrooms: Scaling and Sustaining Instructional Innovations , 2013 .

[27]  L. Resnick Nested Learning Systems for the Thinking Curriculum , 2010 .

[28]  H. Borko Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain , 2004 .

[29]  J. Hiebert,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF CLASSROOM MATHEMATICS TEACHING ON STUDENTS ’ LEARNING , 2006 .

[30]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Towards an Empirically Grounded Theory of Action for Improving the Quality of Mathematics Teaching at Scale. , 2011 .

[31]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Support a Science of Performance Improvement , 2009 .

[32]  D. Ball,et al.  Developing Measures of Teachers’ Mathematics Knowledge for Teaching , 2004, The Elementary school journal.

[33]  J. Stigler,et al.  The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom , 1999 .

[34]  Luciano Meira,et al.  Making Sense of Instructional Devices: The Emergence of Transparency in Mathematical Activity. , 1998 .

[35]  Derek Robbins Theory of practice , 2008 .

[36]  Mary Kay Stein,et al.  Leadership Content Knowledge , 2003 .

[37]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[38]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Constancy and Change in Work Practice in Schools: The Role of Organizational Routines , 2011 .

[39]  Pam Grossman,et al.  Back to the Future: Directions for Research in Teaching and Teacher Education , 2008 .

[40]  DEFINING VISIONS OF HIGH-QUALITY MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION , 2009 .

[41]  Heather C. Hill,et al.  Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California , 2000, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[42]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[43]  S. Fish Doing What Comes Naturally , 2020 .

[44]  Hyman Bass,et al.  Combining the Development of Practice and the Practice of Development in Teacher Education , 2009, The Elementary School Journal.

[45]  Kara Jackson,et al.  Analyzing Educational Policies: A Learning Design Perspective , 2012 .

[46]  A. Sfard Thinking as Communicating: Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing , 2008 .

[47]  Magdalene Lampert,et al.  Teaching Problems and the Problems of Teaching , 2001 .

[48]  J. Lave Understanding practice: The practice of learning , 1993 .

[49]  Adri Smaling,et al.  Varieties of methodological intersubjectivity — the relations with qualitative and quantitative research, and with objectivity , 1992 .

[50]  B. Rogoff Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners , 2009 .