Effects of phenotypic selection on height-diameter ratio of Norway spruce and Scots pine in Sweden

Genetically improved Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) are extensively used in operational Swedish forestry plantations. However, relatively little is known about the stem slenderness (height-diameter ratio) of genetically improved material. Thus, in this study we investigated effects of plus-tree selection on stem slenderness of Norway spruce and Scots pine in Sweden by evaluating both the plus-tree selection and a large number of progeny trials. Species-specific models for predicting the height-diameter ratio were estimated using regression and mixed model approach. Our results show that phenotypic plus-tree selection promoted less slender Norway spruce trees and more slender Scots pine trees compared to neighboring trees. Similar results were also found for the progeny trials which indicated that genetics played a prominent role in the phenotypic appearance. Compared to the progeny of neighboring trees, Norway spruce plus-tree progenies had a 5.3% lower height-diameter ratio, while Scots pine plus-tree progenies had a 1.5% greater height-diameter ratio. The narrow sense heritability for height-diameter ratio was 0.19 for Norway spruce and 0.11 for Scots pine, indicating that it is possible to modify the height-diameter ratio by breeding. Correlation coefficients between breeding values for height-diameter ratio and diameter were negative for Scots pine (–0.71) and Norway spruce (–0.85), indicating that selection for diameter only would result in less slender stems of both species. Similar correlations were also found between breeding values for height-diameter ratio and height of Scots pine (–0.34) and Norway spruce (–0.74).

[1]  S. McKeand,et al.  Height-Diameter Relationships for Different Genetic Planting Stock of Loblolly Pine at Age 6 , 2015 .

[2]  Charles O. Sabatia,et al.  Height and diameter relationships and distributions in loblolly pine stands of enhanced genetic material. , 2013 .

[3]  P. Gould,et al.  Performance of full-sib families of Douglas-fir in pure-family and mixed-family deployments , 2011 .

[4]  L. Lönnstedt,et al.  Developing a Scots Pine Breeding Objective: a Case Study Involving a Swedish Sawmill , 2010 .

[5]  John R Moore,et al.  Influence of initial planting spacing and genotype on microfibril angle, wood density, fibre properties and modulus of elasticity in Pinus radiata D. Don corewood , 2009 .

[6]  M. Berlin.  Development of economic forest tree breeding objectives , 2009 .

[7]  J. Kershaw,et al.  Height–Diameter Relationships for Jack Pine Seedlots of Different Genetic Improvement Levels , 2008 .

[8]  B. Andersson,et al.  Genetic variation in the diameter–height relationship in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) , 2008 .

[9]  P. Gould,et al.  Estimation of Genetic-Gain Multipliers for Modeling Douglas-Fir Height and Diameter Growth , 2008 .

[10]  Urban Nilsson,et al.  Effects of wide spacing and thinning strategies on wood quality in Norway spruce (Picea abies) stands in southern Sweden , 2007 .

[11]  Bengt Andersson,et al.  Characteristics and development of improved Pinus sylvestris in northern Sweden , 2007 .

[12]  S. B. Land,et al.  Incorporating genetic parameters into a loblolly pine growth-and-yield model , 2006 .

[13]  N. Fahlvik,et al.  Models for predicting individual tree height increment and tree diameter in young stands in southern Sweden , 2006 .

[14]  S. Magnussen.  Selection index: economic weights for maximum simultaneous genetic gain , 1990, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[15]  D. Huber,et al.  Estimated realized gains for first-generation slash pine (Pinus elliottii var. elliottii) tree improvement in the southeastern United States , 2004 .

[16]  S. Titus,et al.  Relationships between tree slenderness coefficients and tree or stand characteristics for major species in boreal mixedwood forests , 1998 .

[17]  C. Harrington,et al.  Above- and below-ground characteristics associated with wind toppling in a young Populus plantation , 1996, Trees.

[18]  H. Burkhart,et al.  Genetic Improvement Effects on Growth and Yield of Loblolly Pine Plantations , 1987, Forest Science.

[19]  S. Kurinobu,et al.  Stand-volume prediction of improved trees based on the realized gain in progeny tests of HINOKI (chamaecyparis obtusa Endl.) , 1987 .

[20]  F. Helles,et al.  Windthrow probability as a function of stand characteristics and shelter , 1986 .

[21]  B. Zobel,et al.  Applied Forest Tree Improvement , 1984 .

[22]  G. Minko,et al.  Snow damage in Australian pine plantations , 1983 .

[23]  H. Braastad.  A spacing experiment with Picea abies. , 1970 .

[24]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .