On a systematic perspective on risk for formal safety assessment (FSA)

In the maritime domain, risk is evaluated within the framework of the Formal Safety Assessment (FSA), introduced by the International Maritime Organization in 2002. Although the FSA has become an internationally recognized and recommended method, the definition, which is adopted there, to describe the risk, seems to be too narrow to reflect the actual content of the FSA.

[1]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[2]  A.L.C. Roelen,et al.  Causal Risk Models of Air Transport: Comparison of User Needs and Model Capabilities , 2008 .

[3]  Terje Aven,et al.  Foundational Issues in Risk Assessment and Risk Management , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Andrew Hale,et al.  Accident models and organisational factors in air transport: The need for multi-method models , 2011 .

[5]  Stan Kaplan,et al.  The Words of Risk Analysis , 1997 .

[6]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  G. Apostolakis.  The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[8]  Terje Aven,et al.  Risk communication in the light of different risk perspectives , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Industrial disasters: Extreme events, extremely rare. Some reflections on the treatment of uncertainties in the assessment of the associated risks , 2013 .

[10]  Mohammad Modarres.  Risk Analysis in Engineering : Techniques, Tools, and Trends , 2016 .

[11]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Foundational Issues in Risk Assessment and Risk Management , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  Formal Safety Assessment: an updated review , 2012 .

[13]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  A framework for risk assessment for maritime transportation systems - A case study for open sea collisions involving RoPax vessels , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Terje Aven,et al.  The risk concept - historical and recent development trends , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Terje Aven,et al.  Practical implications of the new risk perspectives , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Nelson Goodman,et al.  Reconceptions in Philosophy and Other Arts and Sciences. , 1990 .

[17]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Two methods for the structured assessment of model uncertainty by experts in performance assessments of radioactive waste repositories , 1996 .

[18]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment , 1996 .

[19]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Formal safety assessment: A critical review , 2009 .

[20]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the meaning of a black swan in a risk context , 2013 .

[21]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Reliability Engineering and System Safety , 2008 .

[22]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Further development of a Causal model for Air Transport Safety (CATS): Building the mathematical heart , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Terje Aven,et al.  Models and model uncertainty in the context of risk analysis , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  T. Aven,et al.  EXPRESSING AND COMMUNICATING UNCERTAINTY IN RELATION TO QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS , 2009 .

[25]  Risto Tuominen,et al.  Qualification of Formal Safety Assessment: an exploratory study , 2004 .

[26]  Terje Aven,et al.  An extended risk assessment approach for chemical plants applied to a study related to pipe ruptures , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Terje Aven,et al.  A conceptual framework for linking risk and the elements of the data-information-knowledge-wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  D. Richards,et al.  Understanding uncertainty , 2012, Evidence-Based Dentistry.

[29]  Catherine Z. Elgin,et al.  Understanding and the facts , 2007 .

[30]  Terje Aven,et al.  On how to define, understand and describe risk , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[31]  John A. McDermid,et al.  The science and superstition of quantitative risk assessment , 2012 .

[32]  Ulf Paulsson,et al.  A grounded theory model for analysis of marine accidents. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  Uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessment , 1996 .

[34]  R. W. Beardsmore.  Art and understanding , 1971 .

[35]  Rikard Levin,et al.  Adequacy Conditions for Reporting Uncertainty in Chemical Risk Assessments , 2006 .