Automated Robotic Measurement of 3-D Cell Morphologies

Cell morphology plays an important role in maintaining normal cellular functions. Existing techniques for cell morphology measurement, such as confocal imaging and atomic force microscopy, have the limitations of photobleaching and incompatibility for integration with other cell manipulation instruments. This paper reports a robotic cell manipulation system that is capable of measuring changes of cell morphologies. This capability is enabled by several key techniques including cell recognition, determination of contact points on a cell, and two vision-based contact detection methods for measuring cell bottom and top surface positions. With the detected cell contour and height information, three-dimensional cell morphology is reconstructed. Experiments show that the cell morphology measurement technique has an overall success rate of 95.67%, an average measurement speed of 2.63 s/contact, and a measurement error of 4.65%. The cell morphology measurement results indicate that bladder cancer cells with higher metastatic potential exhibit lower cell heights than earlier-stage cancer cells because of more disorganized cytoskeleton networks. We also applied the robotic system to microinject the drug Cytochalasin D into cancer cells, and the drug effect on cell morphology changes was quantified.

[1]  Brahim Tamadazte,et al.  Robotic Micromanipulation and Microassembly Using Monoview and Multiscale Visual Servoing , 2011, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[2]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Multi-Scale Blur Estimation and Edge Type Classification for Scene Analysis , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[3]  Yu Liu,et al.  Morphology, in vivo distribution and antitumor activity of bexarotene nanocrystals in lung cancer , 2017, Drug development and industrial pharmacy.

[4]  J A May,et al.  GPIIb-IIIa antagonists cause rapid disaggregation of platelets pre-treated with cytochalasin D. Evidence that the stability of platelet aggregates depends on normal cytoskeletal assembly. , 1998, Platelets.

[5]  Jun Luo,et al.  Locating End-Effector Tips in Robotic Micromanipulation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[6]  Nikolai Dechev,et al.  Development of an Autonomous Biological Cell Manipulator With Single-Cell Electroporation and Visual Servoing Capabilities , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  R. Webb Confocal optical microscopy , 1996 .

[8]  Hamid Ladjal,et al.  Micro-to-Nano Biomechanical Modeling for Assisted Biological Cell Injection , 2013, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[9]  Shaorong Xie,et al.  Robotic Adherent Cell Injection for Characterizing Cell–Cell Communication , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Yu Xie,et al.  Force Sensing and Manipulation Strategy in Robot-Assisted Microinjection on Zebrafish Embryos , 2011, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[11]  Daniel J Müller,et al.  Atomic force microscopy: a nanoscopic window on the cell surface. , 2011, Trends in cell biology.

[12]  Craig A. Simmons,et al.  Correction: Single Cell Deposition and Patterning with a Robotic System , 2011, PLoS ONE.

[13]  G. Berx,et al.  Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression , 2013, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[14]  Sergej Fatikow,et al.  Micro-force sensing in a micro-robotic system , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[15]  T. Lecuit,et al.  Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[16]  Jun Wen,et al.  Voyage inside the cell: Microsystems and nanoengineering for intracellular measurement and manipulation , 2015, Microsystems & Nanoengineering.

[17]  Seppo Kuikka,et al.  Injection Guidance System for Cellular Microinjections , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..